Why should Barr be in charge of the investigation into Epstein's death...

[Getin the ring]

He was in charge with Epstein died, is that not a lot like having the fox guard the hen house?

he's the Attorney general, nimrod

tell us who you think should be in charge, Mueller?

I swear if you triggered idiots had half a brain you'd be dangerous

[cancel2 2022]

He was in charge with Epstein died, is that not a lot like having the fox guard the hen house?

I used to have a modicum of respect for you but no longer. All you seem to do is start endless bullshit threads these days.

[Callinectes]

He was in charge with Epstein died, is that not a lot like having the fox guard the hen house?

Wasn't this initially investigated by the FBI? Isn't the FBI part of the DOJ? Isn't Barr head of the DOJ? Don't you think he might want to keep watch over such a high profile case as this?

[archives]

LOL!!!!!

Must be "truthieism" is common on the right, no content, just emojis, guess it beats "truthie's" corny copy and paste videos

[Truth Detector]

Never said Trump was, but is hard to believe he didn't know what was going on at his golf club all those years,

Yet here you are, moronically implying that there was arsecheese.

...in fact, no one has been charged with anything, but your man Trump is out their planting the inneundos, just what Americans want to see from their President, spreading conspiracies, tough to see Ike stooping to that level

The only one's planting innuendos, lie filled hyperbole, promoting false narratives and lying are leftists like you and the media arsecheese. But you seem to be okay with lying, fabricating and being a glaring hypocrite.

And Barr is a political lackey, from his testimony infront of Congress to everything surrounding Russia he has proven to be nothing more than a political lackey, got to love when he reinforced the Trump conspiracies by echoing catch phrases intiated by Trump himself, almost like he got the memo ahead of time

Once again all we have is the lie filled hyperbole and OPINION of a leftist hack. No facts, nothing substantive and noting connected to reality. Just hyperbolic bullshit and TDS laced lies.

So did you have a problem when Holder declared he was Obama's wingman arsecheese? Answer the question you dishonest hack. I know you won't answer it because it exposes you for the lying leftist hack that you really are.

Eric Holder: ” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

[Truth Detector]

FEC Chair: It’s Illegal To Accept Election Help From Foreign Governments

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fec-c...b0304a120c90eb

Ellen L. Weintraub is a Democrat and Hillary supporter. I didn't ask you for OPINIONATED bullshit from leftist hacks snowflake; I asked for the criminal statute.

Was Ellen concerned that Hillary's campaign paid agents from Russia for a salacious, lie filled dossier intended to sink Trump's campaign and used to spy on Trump's campaign leading to the Mueller investigation HOAX?

I'll accept that you can't find one because they don't exist. Meeting with ANYONE that says they have dirt on an opposition campaign is not illegal. If it were, Hillary would be marched off to jail in handcuffs.

[Darth Omar]

Wasn't this initially investigated by the FBI? Isn't the FBI part of the DOJ? Isn't Barr head of the DOJ? Don't you think he might want to keep watch over such a high profile case as this?

The fact Barr should be forced to micromanage protocol for Epstein says something about the prison he was being held in.

In retrospect, Barr should have checked in a couple times a day; but WTF were the people in charge of Epstein’s safety doing and thinking? I would think this would all be Prison 101 stuff. Prisoner tries to commit suicide so the prisoner gets strict suicide protocol.

Why should it have been up to Barr to see to that?

[zappasguitar]

More stupid.

"A foreign national spending money to influence a federal election can be a crime," Persily said. "And if a U.S. citizen coordinates, conspires or assists in that spending, then it could be a crime."

The law bans foreign nationals "from making expenditures to expressly advocate the election or defeat of a political candidate."

What money was exchanged shit-for-brains?

"Under that statute, it is a federal crime to conspire with anyone, including a foreign government, to ‘deprive another of the intangible right of honest services,’ " Coates said. "That would include fixing a fraudulent election, in my view, within the plain meaning of the statute."

Mueller report clearly states there was no conspiring or conspiracy. More idiotic bullshit from people that should not be allowed anywhere near a law school.

But being the gullible dumb twit that you are, and being incapable of thinking for yourself, you stupidly believe this cut and paste supports your inane claims.

You're the definition of stupid.

Whoopsie...looks like you left out part:

Another election law specialist, John Coates at Harvard University Law School, said if Russians aimed to shape the outcome of the presidential election, that would meet the definition of an expenditure.

Coates said discussions between a campaign and a foreigner could violate the law against fraud.

What a surprise...Truth Rejector REJECTS the facts when he doesn't agree with them.

[Getin the ring]

Whoopsie...looks like you left out part:

Another election law specialist, John Coates at Harvard University Law School, said if Russians aimed to shape the outcome of the presidential election, that would meet the definition of an expenditure.

Coates said discussions between a campaign and a foreigner could violate the law against fraud.

What a surprise...Truth Rejector REJECTS the facts when he doesn't agree with them.

oh look, zappa the nut**bag has managed to talk about Russian collusion in a Jeffry Epstein related thread

TDS is an affliction

[zappasguitar]

Ellen L. Weintraub is a Democrat and Hillary supporter. I didn't ask you for OPINIONATED bullshit from leftist hacks snowflake; I asked for the criminal statute.

Was Ellen concerned that Hillary's campaign paid agents from Russia for a salacious, lie filled dossier intended to sink Trump's campaign and used to spy on Trump's campaign leading to the Mueller investigation HOAX?

I'll accept that you can't find one because they don't exist. Meeting with ANYONE that says they have dirt on an opposition campaign is not illegal. If it were, Hillary would be marched off to jail in handcuffs.

Once again the Truth Rejector skips over the portion that shoots giant holes in his claim:

Weintraub said that “electoral intervention from foreign governments” has been unacceptable for as long as the United States has been a country. Quoting a 1787 letter from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, Weintraub said the Founding Fathers had already “sounded the alarm about ‘foreign Interference, Intrigue and Influence.’”

Now let's stand by and watch as TR tries to claim Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are "leftist hacks".

[Getin the ring]

Once again the Truth Rejector skips over the portion that shoots giant holes in his claim:

Weintraub said that “electoral intervention from foreign governments” has been unacceptable for as long as the United States has been a country. Quoting a 1787 letter from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, Weintraub said the Founding Fathers had already “sounded the alarm about ‘foreign Interference, Intrigue and Influence.’”

Now let's stand by and watch as TR tries to claim Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are "leftist hacks".

why are you here? seriously

[zappasguitar]

why are you here? seriously

Don't like how the thread got diverted?

Take it up with loudmouth Truth Rejector.

Obama was in charge when the Russians supposedly hacked our elections; but you blamed Trump.

How is BARR the fox guarding the hen house? Apparently that "fox" was the NY prison system. How many Republicans are running it?

He was the one who desperately diverted the thread so he wouldn't have to continue discussing Epstein.

[Stretch]

Must be "truthieism" is common on the right, no content, just emojis, guess it beats "truthie's" corny copy and paste videos

A picture's worth a thousand words. I'm laughing at you.

[Truth Detector]

"Truthie" is wrong again, twice, still doesn't top when he struck out with errors all in one post

I'm not wrong. You can't prove I am wrong because I use facts. And you crying and flailing demanding I am is weak and pathetic. You, on the other hand, are SELDOM right. You should be embarrassed by that, but you lack the IQ it would take to comprehend the OBVIOUS.

They are all facts, it is the exact scenario, the Clinton campaign hired a lawyer who hired a firm who hired a British agent who went to Russian sources for dirt on Trump. At the same time, the Trump campaign just asked the Russians directly for help and were eager to get it

I am amused that you think you can equate the illegal act of using a lie filled salacious dossier to spy on a campaign as equal to meeting a Russian who claims they have dirt. Trump's son didn't break any laws.

Obama holdovers and Clinton supporters in the Justice Department broke many laws.

And "truthie's" second error was the use of that dossier. If he had actually read the FISA applications rather than accepting Sean's interpretations he would discover that the dossier plays a minor if any role in the actual aplicarions, it doesn't even make an appearance till half way they the first application, and it explained there exactly what it is amd why it was gathered. Four separate judges wern't fooled by some grand conspiracy out to get Trump

Dear idiot; the FISA applications use the Dossier as their primary evidence. They had NOTHING else. If you had actually read them, you wouldn't be lying like an idiot right now.

Let's see it "truthie" can return with real content now or more of the personal insults based on talk radio rhetoric

What content, other than lying, fabricating and flailing, have you brought, arsecheese? I gave you the actual conclusions from the Mueller Report. The actual testimony from Security Agency Director Admiral Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey.

What do we get in return, whiny bullshit that isn't connected with facts or reality. You're as apathetic and stupid as Zappas Tard.

FACT: Carter Page was targeted in the application. It turns out that Carter Page was being set up by the CIA, not a Russian asset. Carter Page has NEVER been charged with anything.

FACT: Source #1 was none other than Christopher Steele. Also named as a "reliable source" in the application.

FACT: when you actually read the FBI's sources of information, they refer to "an identified news organizations" reporting. That in itself is weak. That would be the Trump hating New York Times.

FACT: This application is signed by none other than the discredited liar James Comey.

FACT: This application is signed on behalf of Loretta Lynch by Sally Yates. Deputy Attorney General.

FACT: This application is dated October of 2016.

https://www.investors.com/wp-content.../D1Release.pdf

[Truth Detector]

Why did Rump hire Acosta?

Why do you avoid facts?