Thomas Fahr Steyer (born June 27, 1957) is an American billionaire hedge fund manager, philanthropist, environmentalist, liberal activist, and fundraiser. He is a candidate in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.
The billionaire is not a parasite priest in the same vein as tax dollar parasite Al Gore, but he is a charity hustler preaching the same tax dollar religion to be sure. Steyer’s résumé should be required reading for every young Wall Street sharpshooter dreaming about tax dollar sugar plum fairies.
I found Steyer’s family connection to the Nuremberg Trials the most fascinating aspect of his bid for the White House:
Tom Steyer was born in 1957 in Manhattan. His mother, Marnie (née Fahr), was a teacher of remedial reading at the Brooklyn House of Detention, and his father, Roy Henry Steyer, was a partner in the New York law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell, and was a prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Steyer
Steyer was not born until 1957, but I am betting that his New World Order worldview took root at his father’s knee. It was the Nuremberg Trials that established the concept of international crime —— quickly followed by non-existent International law —— meaning U.N. law. It was the Nuremberg Trials that gave the infant U.N. the on-going agenda that all future war crimes trials would be judged by an International panel in The Hague.
Most Americans today do not know much about the Nuremberg Trials, while many Americans in the late 1940s saw the political implications of the Nuremberg Trials. They did not like what they saw. American Communists were the exceptions; they still go all gooey-eyed at the mention of the Nuremberg Trials.
The wartime alliance of America, Britain and the Soviet Union began to fall apart before WWII officially ended, but their leaders were united in one respect: The determination to arraign the principal Nazis for their crimes. The three powers agreed at a London conference in August 1945 to put the Nazis on trial. France, liberated in 1944, became the fourth member of a tribunal.
Each of the four powers appointed a senior judge, an alternate judge and a team of prosecutors. Nuremberg was chosen as the venue not only because it had a courthouse that had survived the war unscathed, but also because the Bavarian city had been the scene of Nazi party rallies and was associated with Hitler's race laws.
For the record, War Crimes Trials were conducted in Germany, Japan, the Philippines, and Australia shortly after WW II ended. Those trials were military tribunals. The most famous of those trials were held in Nuremberg. Collectively, they were called International Military Tribunals or IMT. Those trials were a big mistake.
A German court should have tried those Nazis who were not tried in the countries where the crimes were committed. Malleable Teutons wearing black robes could have been found who would have come to the same conclusions that non-German judges presiding over the Nuremberg Trials came to.
Even though the U.N. had nothing to do with the War Crimes Trials, the U.N.’s phoney judiciary headquartered in The Hague (the World Court, and the International Criminal Court) evolved into adjudicators of non-existent International law above and beyond treaties entered into by sovereign nations that are loosely defined as International law.
The punishment that was meted out to top Nazis at Nuremberg could have been doled out by the courts in those countries whose people had suffered at the hands of the Nazis. WWII Socialists wanted no part of that brand of justice.
Had Nazis been tried and condemned in national courts, Socialists rightly feared that top Communists would someday be tried by the people they were brutalizing in Soviet satellites. The precedent would have been established. That would never do. By extension, the U.N.’s judiciary —— WHERE THERE IS NO DEATH PENALTY—— protects the top people accused of a war crime from being put to death. The U.N. is all about protecting ruling classes when they go bad.
Communist murderers are protected by the World Court. Whenever The Hague comes sucking around for more money you will never hear Congress say no because Communists like Stalin and Mao are supposed to get away with their crimes.
Nuremberg Principals is code talk for Socialist/Communist ideology.
Younger Americans might not be aware of the 1961 movie Judgement at Nuremberg; a film about Nazis who were judged in Nazi Germany. In spite of the star-studded cast, I would not recommend it to young movie buffs. J-at-N is an overrated stinker that is highly regarded by liberals. Indeed, J-at-N is the parasite class’s equivalent of Gone With The Wind.
The film was accurate in that the defendants were judged by a military tribunal with three American civilian judges presiding. In real life the United States got its authority from Control Council Law No. 10 which can accurately be described as an early attempt to establish “International law.” Wikipedia gives this brief explanation of No. 10:
Although it had been initially planned to hold more than just one international trial at the IMT, the growing differences between the victorious allies (the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Soviet Union) made this impossible. However, the Control Council Law No. 10, which the Allied Control Council had issued on December 20, 1945, empowered any of the occupying authorities to try suspected war criminals in their respective occupation zones. Based on this law, the U.S. authorities proceeded after the end of the initial Nuremberg Trial against the major war criminals to hold another twelve trials in Nuremberg. The judges in all these trials were American, and so were the prosecutors; the Chief of Counsel for the Prosecution was Brigadier General Telford Taylor. In the other occupation zones similar trials took place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsequ...remberg_Trials
I never understood how an agreement reached by four WWII allies can be called law. Call it for what it is; the winners judging the losers, but do not confuse it with the way most Americans view laws that are legislated in sovereign nations.
Socialist intellectuals have been working towards establishing International law since the second half of the 19th century. I believe that J-at-N was the first major propaganda attempt to sell International law to an suspecting public. (J-at-N was shown on television’s Playhouse 90 before it was made into a theatrical movie.)
After listening to some of the dialogue in the movie it is hard to miss the standard liberal garbage. The movie’s attack on love of country is even more offensive than is glorifying International law. That is not to say I put in with the kind of patriotism the Nazis practiced. The not-so-subliminal message that I object to is that patriotism itself was portrayed as the villain; i.e., Nazi judges went along out of their love for Germany.
Even if you watched J-at-N in 1961 to be entertained without analyzing the dialogue you were led to the inevitable conclusion: The world must never let such things happen again. “The world” in Liberaldom naturally means a global government administered by the United Nations. Ergo, International law must be obeyed while national sovereignty must be abolished. That piece of propaganda has been doing its insidious dirty work for 58 years and counting. That is a long run for a mistake.
Bottom line: The success of the Democrat Party’s takeover of America’s government can be traced directly to the mistakes made in the aftermath of World War Two. Everything Tom Steyer represents compounds those mistakes.
Democratic billionaire Tom Steyer of California has big plans for his first day as president.
“I will declare a state of emergency on day one,” he said, referring to the need to take on the effects of climate change. “We are faced with something that will affect the health and safety of every single American, and every single American in the future.”
Clown Emeritus
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks