Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?

[Truth Detector]

How can you say that's what Mueller said since you didn't read his report?

You haven't read it either you fucking loon. Otherwise you wouldn't be ranting and raving like a mental retard about things that aren't in it.

Find me the exact page and paragraph that says votes were changed shit-for-brains. You are certifiably retarded.

[LV426]

[SIZE=4]Did Russian interference effect the 2016 election

AFFECT.

Not "effect", you stupid fucking idiot.

[Earl]

No collusion, insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction.

"Case closed." McConnell.

[Truth Detector]

My point is that it wasn't just Trump conspiring with Russia, it was the entire Conservative movement and Republican Party.

Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

So you're trying to create a straw man here.

No, you're trying to promote a dumb lie.

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

[LV426]

no one anywhere claims vote total hacking.

So now you're moving the bar to give yourself some wiggle room.

For two years, you denied Russia hacked anything.

Then you said they did hack, but didn't change anything.

Now you're saying they didn't change any vote totals, but you have no proof of that and are working off only Rod Rosenstein's assurance.

Hacking into a data base (RAM) is not the same as successfully hacking into ROM operations

How do you know that is all they did?

Remember, you denied they even hacked anything. For two years you said that. Now you're saying "OK they hacked, but trust me, nothing was changed".

Well, your shit judgment was wrong for two years, so why would your judgment be right today?

[Truth Detector]

AFFECT.

Not "effect", you stupid fucking idiot.

Ironic coming from a mentally retarded asshat who still moronically bloviates about Russian hacking and Collusion. You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

[Truth Detector]

For two years, you denied Russia hacked anything.

No votes were hacked you brain dead lunatic. WTF is wrong with you? Seriously; you should be institutionalized.

[LV426]

I am not answering cherry picked quotes.

LOL! What a fucking crybaby.

What quote did I cherry pick? Do you know what words are? You are flailing here. It's really embarrassing to watch.

[Truth Detector]

LOL! What a fucking crybaby.
What quote did I cherry pick? Do you know what words are? You are flailing here. It's really embarrassing to watch.

^^Going FULL RETARD mode now.

[LV426]

I've shown the Mueller report is a political hack job.

No, you've lazily plagiarized other people's hack jobs and represented it as yours while admitting you haven't even read the report yourself.

Cowardice.

[LV426]

Not all undecided voters were persuaded to vote for Trump.

But enough were persuaded in the key states Manafort was sharing polling data for..."a small percentage of voters" as you said.

100,000 was all it took.

Is 100,000 "a small percentage of voters"? These are your words, Flash.

Democratic propaganda persuaded some idiots to vote for Clinton.

What propaganda was that?

That Trump was running a secret child cannibal sex ring out of a DC pizza shop?

That Hillary Clinton deleted thousands of e-mails that implicated her in (insert conspiracy theory here)?

Seriously, what Democratic propaganda was created top persuade idiots to vote for Clinton?

You try to make everything both sides because your mind is binary and cannot hold complex thoughts.

Both sides put out propaganda to persuade people to vote for their candidate

There is it..."both sides". So...what country were the Democrats working with to create propaganda and memes to disparage Trump? NONE YOU SAY? So there goes your "both sides".

[Earl]

No collusion, insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction.

"Case closed." McConnell

Ya esta.

[Truth Detector]

No, you've lazily plagiarized other people's hack jobs and represented it as yours while admitting you haven't even read the report yourself.
Cowardice.

[Truth Detector]

But enough were persuaded in the key states Manafort was sharing polling data for..."a small percentage of voters" as you said.

100,000 was all it took.

Is 100,000 "a small percentage of voters"? These are your words, Flash.

What propaganda was that?

That Trump was running a secret child cannibal sex ring out of a DC pizza shop?

That Hillary Clinton deleted thousands of e-mails that implicated her in (insert conspiracy theory here)?

Seriously, what Democratic propaganda was created top persuade idiots to vote for Clinton?

You try to make everything both sides because your mind is binary and cannot hold complex thoughts.

There is it..."both sides". So...what country were the Democrats working with to create propaganda and memes to disparage Trump? NONE YOU SAY? So there goes your "both sides".

^^Thinks votes were changed.

[LV426]

Not all undecided voters were persuaded to vote for Trump. Democratic propaganda persuaded some idiots to vote for Clinton.

Both sides put out propaganda to persuade people to vote for their candidate---they are the same (and often use the same campaign consultants).

"Both sides are the same" is the pinnacle of laziness.

It says that you are incapable of making distinctions and differences, and that your mind is so shallow and limited you cna only process things in binary; that for every piece of shit, there has to be an equal and opposite piece of shit on the other side because your mind is to fragile to reconcile the fact that not everything is the same, and not everything has an equivalent.

You crave balance because that is the only way you can handle the world...in your mind, everything has to have a balance because you cannot tolerate instability. So you seek equivalents because your mind cannot wrap itself around the fact that not everything in the world has an equivalent. You don't want to admit that's the case because that would be an admission that you lack control that comes from balance.

Rhetorically, "both sides" is the lazy man's argument of avoidance.