Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?

[Rune]

FULL RETARD - UNSUPPORTED GARBAGE -all indications say OTHERWISE

What indications?

List them.

[Rune]

unbelievable retarded..this from the moron who ran around screaming "Russian collusion"

from day 1 I said collusion/conspiracy was a stupid premise - it would require Putin to aid Trump still not knowing he would win when every indication was Hillary was going to win

you have NO ROOM TO WIGGLE OR CONDEMN OTHERS WHEN YOU BOUGHT INTO RUSSIAN COLLUSION

You are such a lying asshole.
You've been caught, take it like a man.

[Rune]

This is true.

Dukka/Anatta/1000 other ID's was saying for two years that Russia didn't hack anything.

Over and over and over he said that.

Now, he's saying "OK they did hack, bUt ThEy DiDn'T cHaNgE AnYtHiNg" after being wrong about them hacking for two years straight.

So since he was wrong about there even being a hack, why would he suddenly be right about nothing changing as a result of that hack?

He has no credibility, and piss poor judgment.

Post of the month award.
The lying bitch also claimed that he could do his taxes on a post card and that taxes would drop for the middle class.
He lies with no shame.

[anatta]

Post of the month award.
The lying bitch also claimed that he could do his taxes on a post card and that taxes would drop for the middle class.
He lies with no shame.

ROFL . I can do my taxes on a postcard ( you don't understand that was a reference to simplification w/ no deduction), and taxes did drop for middle class.

Unless you were in a SALT state, like yourself- too bad

[anatta]

You are such a lying asshole.
You've been caught, take it like a man.

ROFL take what? Russian collusion? I am am not gullible and stupid like Mueller worshipers

[LV426]

unbelievable retarded..this from the moron who ran around screaming "Russian collusion"

1. You said for two years straight that Russia didn't hack anything. You're only now saying Russia did hack because the evidence laid out in the Mueller report is indisputable.

2. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Manafort shared polling data from the same states Trump narrowly won, and which were targeted by the IRA and Russian propagandists, with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.

3. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why the Republican Party changed its platform at the 2016 RNC to be more pro-Russia.

4. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with known Russian spies.

[anatta]

What indications? List them.

did you get hit on the head with a lead pipe? You can't follow the conversation?? WTF do you think it means -
it means no vote totals weer hacked

[LV426]

from day 1 I said collusion/conspiracy was a stupid premise -

No, from day one you said Russia didn't hack anything.

Then you changed that once the evidence of their hack became indisputable.

Now you're saying that they did hack, but didn't conspire with Trump or the GOP to do so, but you can't really say that because you can't explain:

a) The inconvenient event of the GOP changing their platform to be pro-Russia at the 2016 RNC
b) Why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reasons for the 2016 June Trump Tower meeting
c) Why Manafort was sharing polling data with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.

So you keep changing what it is you say is true, and you do it because you're a pathetic troll on the internet who realized you have to carry Trump's baggage now and forever. That's why you keep creating new IDs...you hate being held to account for all the dumb, stupid things you say here that end up being wrong.

[anatta]

1. You said for two years straight that Russia didn't hack anything. You're only now saying Russia did hack because the evidence laid out in the Mueller report is indisputable.

it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

2. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Manafort shared polling data from the same states Trump narrowly won, and which were targeted by the IRA and Russian propagandists, with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.

I need not provide an alternate explanation. I only have to show Mueller was skipping the fact Kilimnik was a known US State Dept asset. Mueller had the source doc to know he was a US asset as well

3. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why the Republican Party changed its platform at the 2016 RNC to be more pro-Russia.

they did NOT change their platform - you are so freaking brain dead i'v e given you links and you conveniently forget them the next day

What really happened with the GOP platform and Russia
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/b...orm-and-russia

4. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with known Russian spies.

Mueller said that was not collusion, that's all that matters

[reagansghost]

it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

I need not provide an alternate explanation. I only have to show Mueller was skipping the fact Kilimnik was a known US State Dept asset. Mueller had the source doc to know he was a US asset as well


they did NOT change their platform - you are so freaking brain dead i'v e given you links and you conveniently forget them the next day

What really happened with the GOP platform and Russia
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/b...orm-and-russia
Mueller said that was not collusion, that's all that matters

shut the fuck gasbag.....Washington Examiner lol

go eat your borscht asshole

[LV426]

it means no vote totals weer hacked

You don't know that, fraud.

The only assurance you have is Rod Rosenstein, and he's not credible or trustworthy.

Why would Russia hack our election systems and not change anything?

[LV426]

it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

So now you're saying Russia didn't hack?

Everyone, including the DNI past and present, said they did.

So what gives?

[LV426]

it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

1. Why did Trump order the Dowd phone call?
2. Why did Manafort share polling data with Kilmnik for months?

[anatta]

You don't know that, fraud.

The only assurance you have is Rod Rosenstein, and he's not credible or trustworthy.

Why would Russia hack our election systems and not change anything?

no one anywhere claims vote total hacking. I've gone over this as well with you -do you ever recall one thing ?

Hacking into a data base (RAM) is not the same as successfully hacking into ROM operations

[LV426]

I need not provide an alternate explanation

Yes you do. You're here saying you can't explain these things, therefore they didn't happen. But they did happen, and you know the reason why they happened. You just don't want to say because of what it means for your credibility on these boards.

But that's why you create new IDs, isn't it? Because you burn through your credibility.