Page 25 of 37 FirstFirst ... 1521222324252627282935 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 551

Thread: Red Flag Law- Extreme Risk Protective Order

  1. #361 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    a grand jury decision doesn't remove property or violate the rights of people, idiot.

    more doubling down on your stupidity. hilarious
    The grand jury indicts, dumbfuck. You know. The process that puts people in prison?

  2. #362 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    The grand jury indicts, dumbfuck. You know. The process that puts people in prison?
    and thank you for proving you also don't know how the fucking trial process works, dumbass ROFL

    FYI, an indictment is not a conviction or prison sentence...................since you obviously don't know shit.

    your stupidity, priceless
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  3. #363 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    23,264
    Thanks
    6,282
    Thanked 16,526 Times in 11,565 Posts
    Groans
    1,236
    Groaned 513 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    First I can find nothing that says a person facing a red flag hearing is not notified to present their side. If there is then link to it.

    Temporary means temporary

  4. #364 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    since you're in to exact words, what does 'shall not be infringed' mean??????

    checkmate, cumbucket


    Got your ass kicked and now you divert. Typical.

    Heller, dumbfuck. Read Heller and your hero, Scalia. You get “infringed” every day. And it’s constitutional.

  5. #365 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    and thank you for proving you also don't know how the fucking trial process works, dumbass ROFL

    FYI, an indictment is not a conviction or prison sentence...................since you obviously don't know shit.

    your stupidity, priceless
    A hearing isn’t either, dumbfuck.

  6. #366 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    citations are not the spoken words, obviously, but there are voluminous copies of all of those items I mentioned that specifically have citations...........are they not good enough for you to use? and don't bother with the common sense argument, you don't know what it is.


    there's no rewriting history at all. there have been dozens of citations providing you hateful anti gunners and communists with proof that the 2nd Amendment prevents the feds from touching our firearms.............go read them


    there is no such right, despite your racist attempts to come up with one.
    Citations ass- Dumb Ass! Fuck you and your Citations!

  7. #367 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    “the Supreme Court has found that temporary DUI checkpoint stops (without reasonable suspicion) do not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of drivers. Basically, the Court said the importance of keeping impaired drivers off the road generally outweighs the inconvenience and intrusion to motorists. (Michigan Dep't of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).)”

    Checkmate, stupid fuck.
    The Supreme Court does not have authority to change or interpret the Constitution.

  8. #368 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    Got your ass kicked and now you divert. Typical.

    Heller, dumbfuck. Read Heller and your hero, Scalia. You get “infringed” every day. And it’s constitutional.
    this is my last post to you, only so much stupid from you i can handle.......i've read heller, many times. from day one i said he fucked that decision........and yes, infringements are unconstitutional. that you can't understand that is your issue. but you hate the constitution, so its not that surprising.

    try to remember at least this little part here........Scalia was not my hero. he was a pro big government tyrant who labored to pretend he was interpreting a constitution, not rebuilding a new one.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #369 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    Citations ass- Dumb Ass! Fuck you and your Citations!
    well, if you don't care what was meant by the founders when we the people ratified a constitution, then you don't care about the constitution.

    dont' argue it with me anymore, i'm not interested in entertaining your theoristic bullshit
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  10. #370 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Never heard of a grand jury, have you, idiot?
    Grand juries determine if there is a need for a trial or not, dumbass. No one's property or rights are taken away at grand juries.

  11. #371 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    No dude, I can't wake the dead any more than you can. But, I am capable of using common sense- something you should learn to do as well!

    But just because we cannot ask our forefathers, does not mean that I am going to let you Bat-shit-crazy Gun-Toting Conspiracy Terrorists rewrite American history to justify your Insane fetish for guns and ideas of overthrowing our own government and shooting innocent people you don't like at the Walmart stores!

    You people are a problem- and our country is being assaulted by you Gun-Toting idiots that think the 2nd Amendment gives you maniacs some imagined right to turn your guns on and carry out your murderous assaults on people you racists don't like!
    The 2nd amendment does not give license to murder, dumbass.

  12. #372 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    then i'd say the problem was with the state, not the health professional
    Well, the State prosecutor anyway.

  13. #373 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    6-3 decision, stupid cunt. DUI checkpoints DO NOT violate the 4th. You can look it up on numerous sources, you fucking idiot.

    “In sum, the balance of the State's interest in preventing drunken driving, the extent to which this system can reasonably be said to advance that interest, and the degree of intrusion upon individual motorists who are briefly stopped, weighs in favor of the state program. We therefore hold that it is consistent with the Fourth Amendment.The judgment of the Michigan Court of Appeals is accordingly reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

    It is so ordered.”

    CHECKMATE, cunt.
    The Supreme Court does not have authority to change or interpret the Constitution. Neither does any police force.

  14. #374 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    The grand jury indicts, dumbfuck. You know. The process that puts people in prison?
    Indictment does not put anyone in prison.

  15. #375 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    this is my last post to you, only so much stupid from you i can handle.......i've read heller, many times. from day one i said he fucked that decision........and yes, infringements are unconstitutional. that you can't understand that is your issue. but you hate the constitution, so its not that surprising.

    try to remember at least this little part here........Scalia was not my hero. he was a pro big government tyrant who labored to pretend he was interpreting a constitution, not rebuilding a new one.
    Sure as shit not unconstitutional, delusional moron. SCOTUS rules, whether you like it or not.

    Another checkmate, fool.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 07-16-2019, 01:12 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-05-2019, 10:01 AM
  3. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 07-03-2018, 02:20 PM
  4. Protective Tariffs: The Primary Cause of the Civil War
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 223
    Last Post: 03-07-2018, 10:14 AM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-16-2018, 06:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •