Then the prosecutor, and the State he works for, is liable for the murders and can be tried as such. The State government is charged with protecting the citizens of that State. It can be charged with dereliction of duty. The prosecutor himself is now essentially an accessory to the crimes of the mental health professional, and in turn, is a contributing factor to the murders.
That is one way to look at it.
The other, more correct way is this:
The background check itself is illegal. Nothing should have prevented the asian lunatic from obtaining a gun. Leaving a lunatic that is a danger to himself and others on the streets intentionally is a crime in and of itself which the mental health professional should be tried for. The prosecutor that failed to uphold the law and failed to try for involuntary commitment is a contributing factor to the murders just as much as the mental health professional himself is.
Last edited by Into the Night; 08-07-2019 at 10:41 AM.
Hey thanks, but you are off on a tangent with your idea that you think the 2nd Amendment was written with the bat-shit-crazy idea that our fore-fathers wanted to keep it's citizens armed- JUST IN CASE THEY WANTED TO TURN THEM ON IT"S OWN GOVERNMENT.
Do you really believe that kind of bat-shit-craziness?
FUCK NO DUDE!
Our Forefathers were very concerned that the King Of England could return and start the war all over again, and they did not trust the Kings of Spain or France from attacking us at any time either- SO THEY WANTED TO INSURE THAT THEIR CITIZENS REMAIN ARMED SO THAT THEY COULD ASSIST THE CONTINENTAL ARMY TO FIGHT FOREIGN ENEMIES!
This was never about arming citizens so they could overthrow our own Continental Army at their own discretion!
I mean really dude- that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard! LOL!
Last edited by Adolf_Twitler; 08-07-2019 at 11:08 AM.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks