DOJ attempts to limit Mueller's testimony

**Southern Chicken** · 07-23-2019, 05:07 PM

Originally Posted by archives

Not only that, they consulted Mueller prior to his testimony, consulting being a cordial description

Barr actually has no power over what Mueller says, however, he knows Mueller is a straight arrow guy, a conservative, a bureaucrat, who is not going to rock any boats, the last thing he wants is to draw attention to himself, to make himself the center of the story. Barr's purpose was most likely to reinforce the image Mueller has of himself

Matters little, if the Democrats just get Mueller to actually publicly recap what he said in his report it would accomplish their task. Keep in mind, the majority of Americans didn't read Mueller's report, all they have is billy barr's framing of the report, so if the details in the report are actually exposed it would go a long way for the Democrats. Just hearing about the hundred plus contacts with Russians would raise questions

Interesting theory except Mueller asked for guidance not the other way around.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bar...ries-of-report

**Celticguy** · 07-23-2019, 05:19 PM

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bar...ries-of-report

As Mueller said in his presser, he wont be saying anything beyond what is public.
These silly attempts to dial back expectations are pathetic.

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:22 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Chicken

Interesting theory except Mueller asked for guidance not the other way around.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bar...ries-of-report

Fox News= Fake News

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:24 PM

Originally Posted by Teflon Don

Didn’t Muller limit his testimony during his presser?

And why is Mullet testifying? Shouldn’t it be Weissman the Clinton hack? He did all of the work

AG Barr=corrupt

**Celticguy** · 07-23-2019, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Trumpet

Fox News= Fake News

Says the guy who just made up his op. Lol

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:26 PM

Originally Posted by Heff

Jesus, is that supposed to be English?

It sounds like the Mueller report wasn't good enough for you, even though you guys were banking on it. Now you need Mueller to report on the Mueller report, wasting everyone's time and the taxpayer's dollar.

The next report will be about Trump's and Epstein's sex crimes.

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by Celticguy

Says the guy who just made up his op. Lol

Sorry but the truth is the truth

**countryboy** · 07-23-2019, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by Trumpet

Our corrupted Attorney General has sent a letter to, Mueller telling him, to limit his testimony to just the Mueller's report. Sure sounds like there's more going on here, and Trump is very concern.

Of course, as per usual, the liberal propagandist provides no source for his/her/it's claim. Shocker.

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by Heff

Jesus, is that supposed to be English?

It sounds like the Mueller report wasn't good enough for you, even though you guys were banking on it. Now you need Mueller to report on the Mueller report, wasting everyone's time and the taxpayer's dollar.

We now need to investigate Trump's sex crimes.

**countryboy** · 07-23-2019, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by Trumpet

The next report will be about Trump's and Epstein's sex crimes.

Is this finally "it"? Because, libs have been wrong every time.

**countryboy** · 07-23-2019, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by Trumpet

We now need to investigate Trump's sex crimes.

Based on?

**Sailor** · 07-23-2019, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by countryboy

Is this finally "it"? Because, libs have been wrong every time.

Every SINGLE time. Not correct once.

**Trumpet** · 07-23-2019, 05:36 PM

Originally Posted by countryboy

Based on?

https://www.masstortnexus.com/News/5...Underage-Girls

**Sailor** · 07-23-2019, 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by Trumpet

https://www.masstortnexus.com/News/5...Underage-Girls

Click your own link am I am certain that is where you got your "facts" from.

**Darth Omar** · 07-23-2019, 05:39 PM

Originally Posted by archives

As I said, and it ain't all that difficult, few, and even less Trumpkins, have ever read the Mueller Report. If Mueller just reviews what he found, for example, the hundred contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians, it will be probably the first time the majority of America ever heard of the details

And billy barr did as was expected by Trump, he offered his personal interpretations, framed it, didn't you think it was a bit strange he felt the need to come public to say what he thought was in it before anyone else actually saw the report? Mueller didn't say Trump was off the hook, no obstruction, billy barr did, and kinda ironic how he perfectly restated Trump's line of "no collusion, no obstruction," which isn't in the Mueller report, hell, Mueller couldn't even come up with a legal definition of collusion

If Mullet interpreted the guidance memos to mean he couldn’t make a conclusion [not an indictment, but a conclusion] then why didn’t he consult the office of legal council for an opinion? That’s standard procedure but so much of this charade was anything but ‘standard procedure’.

Supposedly, that’s being looked into.

Did Mullet intentionally NOT seek clarification because he *couldn’t* come to a conclusion of guilt? Did he purposely file a report that could be ‘framed’ to comport with the democrat’s obstruction narrative?

Sure as hell looks that way.