UH OH Donny!!......he's shitting those pants now, for sure!!

[Heff]

This is the same guy who defended Justin Cooper, the DNC staffer who setup Clinton's private servers and destroyed evidence with a hammer. You can't make this stuff up.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Stretch,

Evidently it wasn't, it won't be tomorrow and it won't be after tomorrow.

Can you post a link backing up what you're claiming about the future?

[reagansghost]

oh man, this is fantastic news for Americans!

[Loving91390]

...this little item pretty much fucks the asshole's only hope...……..GONE!!


Mueller asks for aide to appear as witness during hearings

Source: NY Times

WASHINGTON -- Robert S. Mueller III has asked that his longtime right-hand aide be sworn in as a witness during Wednesday's hearing with the House Judiciary Committee about the special counsel's investigation, according to congressional officials familiar with the request.

Democrats have yet to agree to the request, and Mr. Mueller is the only witness listed for the hearing, according to a committee spokesman. It was unclear if Mr. Mueller had made a similar request to the House Intelligence Committee, the panel holding the second of two highly anticipated hearings on Wednesday where Mr. Mueller is scheduled to testify.

If the aide, Aaron Zebley, were to take an oath to testify, he could be questioned by lawmakers on the panel, taking pressure off Mr. Mueller to respond to questions he may not be able or want to answer. But his presence would upend carefully laid plans by Democrats and Republicans over how to use their scant time with Mr. Mueller, a reluctant witness known for his concision while under oath.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/u...testimony.html

So you think his aide will lie for him ?

[PostmodernProphet]

BucKKKle will spend all tomorrow night in hiding........

[reagansghost]

So you think his aide will lie for him ?

nope

[Loving91390]

nope

Than why does he need the aide ?

[PostmodernProphet]

Hello Southern Chicken,



No problem. The Mueller Report is enough to sink Trump if only people would read it.

you're amazing.......obviously you're either one of the few people who hasn't read it or you don't care that everyone knows you're lying about what is in it........there is nothing in the report to "sink" anyone......if there had been, he would currently be sunk......

[PostmodernProphet]

Mueller has stated many times he'll not add anything to the report that no one's read, the House panels are using these hearings to get the report out there in the public square

THIS GUY has no such restraints, which appears to be why Mueller requested he testify

everyone's read the report, fuckwit........you've wallpapered your mom's basement with it.......everyone is aware you're lying about it and you just look like a clown.....

[reagansghost]

you know the GOP'ers on the intel committee are SHITTING their pants right now...…….so much of their strategy is character assassination on Mueller...…….now there is basically ANOTHER Mueller there to answer questions Mueller cannot

SWEET!

[reagansghost]

everyone's read the report,

have you read it hon?

[reagansghost]

just keeps getting worse for TrumpWorld


BREAKING: Michael Flynn's business partner Bijan Kian was convicted on both charges

Source: Marshall Cohen CNN reporter

BREAKING: Michael Flynn's business partner Bijan Kian was convicted on both charges of illegally lobbying for the Turkish government, per @FossumSamuel. Case appeared to be on very thin ice but jurors in Virginia returned 2 guilty verdicts. Case originated from the Mueller probe.

[reagansghost]

nice work Al:


Al Franken-"What I'd Ask Mueller"

Love it, especially this part-


12. In that same press conference, Attorney General Barr said that the Report had concluded that there had been “no collusion” between the Trump campaign and the Russians. The President likes to repeat that every chance he can. But you did not conclude that there was no collusion, did you?

13. In fact, on page two of the Report you say, “…Collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.” So, would it be fair to say that you made no judgement at all in the Report about whether there was collusion?

14. So, if a graduate of an accredited law school asserted that the Report had concluded that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, would that be person be wrong?

15. And just so the average non-lawyer understands, that means that no one could ever be charged with collusion in federal court because collusion is not a criminal offense in the U.S. code. We all understand what collusion is, but it’s just not something you could ever indict someone for. Just as you would never indict someone for, say, “being in cahoots.” We all understand what the colloquial “to be in cahoots” means. For example, in the Roger Stone indictment, which was redacted in the Report, it says that Mr. Stone and the Trump campaign were in cahoots with WikiLeaks. But I think you would agree, Director Mueller, that we are never going to hear this in a federal courtroom: “Your honor, the jury finds the defendant, Roger Stone, guilty of being in cahoots.” Am I correct?

16. And what is the statute of limitations on being in cahoots? I think everyone gets my point. The reason that’s a joke is that it’s so ridiculous. But saying the Report concluded that there was no collusion – isn’t that just as ridiculous?

17. Staying on that point. Would it be fair to say that by sharing internal polling data on Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin with Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI considered to be connected to Russian intelligence, that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and Kiliminik appear to have been in cahoots?




https://alfranken.com/read/what-id-ask-mueller

[Stretch]

Hello Stretch,
Can you post a link backing up what you're claiming about the future?

[PostmodernProphet]

have you read it hon?

of course.....that's how I know you are lying about what's in it.....