why Mueller could not take down Trump

[countryboy]

not according to Mueller

Can you cite a single sentence in the Mueller op-ed, that states explicitly that Trump broke any laws? Of course you can't.

[reagansghost]

Can you cite a single sentence in the Mueller op-ed, that states explicitly that Trump broke any laws? Of course you can't.

when did Mueller say Trump didn't obstruct justice?

link?

[countryboy]

when did Mueller clear Trump of Obstruction of Justice?

link?

When he punted to Barr. Besides, it has never been a prosecutor's duty to exonerate anyone. Can you cite another single example of this? Of course you can't.

[reagansghost]

When he punted to Barr. .

no he didn't

[Darth Omar]

he did take down Trump comrade, couldn't prosecute due to DOJ/OLC policy that forbids indicting a sitting president

oh right...…..how would a Russian national know that, my bad

Republicans need to shoot that tired meme down tomorrow.

Per Jonathan Turley:

Your report references the policy of the Justice Department office of legal counsel against indicting a sitting president. But the underlying memos do not say anything about finding criminal conduct in a special counsel report, correct? Is it not true that Barr and Rosenstein, your supervisors, encouraged you to reach a conclusion on both crimes of obstruction and collusion? If you were concerned about your interpretation of the memos, why did you not follow the standard approach of requesting an opinion from the office of legal counsel during your investigation? If there had been disagreement among your staff on the scope of the obstruction provisions, why did you not likewise request an opinion on that issue?

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...mpression=true

[countryboy]

when did Mueller say Trump didn't obstruct justice?

link?

Ah, so you can't, that's what I thought.

[reagansghost]

Ah, so you can't, that's what I thought.

thanks for playing

[PostmodernProphet]

not according to Mueller

according to what he has said and written.......I cannot speak to what you discovered when you read his mind......

[countryboy]

thanks for playing

Any time. I always enjoy debunking your idiotic lies GB. All my best to Gammy.

[reagansghost]

according to what he has said and written.......I cannot speak to what you discovered when you read his mind......

how many ID's you have here Ivan?

[Superfreak]

Mueller said he couldn't indict due to DOJ/OLC policy, left that up to his boss Barr

you're retarded

Again, he could not indict due to the letter ruling. That does not mean he could not reach a conclusion on obstruction. It simply means the actual indictment would have come after Trump left office.

He reached a conclusion on coordination/conspiring. He could have done the same on obstruction. But he didn't.

[Superfreak]

when did Mueller clear Trump of Obstruction of Justice?

link?

His job was not to clear Trump. His job was to determine if there was evidence to support indicting Trump. He concluded on the coordination, he punted on obstruction.

[Phantasmal]

I don’t think Mueller’s testimony will be what Democrats are hoping for, but I also think it will do more damage than Republicans claim it will. It really will be about the new information Democrats can get from Mueller.

The Republicans will in the meantime be mostly focusing on the FBI and FISA topics as always.

[Superfreak]

I don’t think Mueller’s testimony will be what Democrats are hoping for, but I also think it will do more damage than Republicans claim it will. It really will be about the new information Democrats can get from Mueller.

The Republicans will in the meantime be mostly focusing on the FBI and FISA topics as always.

I agree on the first part, but what damage do you think it could do? Short of enough evidence to impeach, the Dems lose this fight.

[PostmodernProphet]

how many ID's you have here Ivan?

lol, bucKKKle........I have the same single ID I have had since 2009.......and you?.......