why Mueller could not take down Trump

[dukkha]

Judicial Watch, through its investigations and litigation, has turned up important exculpatory government records and documents exonerating Trump from the Russia hoax that the Mueller team chose to omit from their report. Judicial Watch has also demonstrated that the investigators were hardly the objective paragons of virtue as portrayed in the media but were a politically biased hit team.

For example, the hiring effort was led by Andrew Weissman, who was enough of a Democratic insider to have been invited to Hillary Clinton’s election night party. He assembled a left-leaning team of investigators who could be counted on to approach the question with the proper “get Trump” attitude. Take, for example Jeannie Rhee, who was working the Papadopoulos case fresh off her previous assignment protecting the Clinton Foundation at the law firm WilmerHale. Each revelation makes the investigation sound more like an inside job.

When Peter Strzok and Lisa Page’s outrageous conduct and flagrant anti-Trump bias became too much for Mueller, he hid the fact from the American people for four months. Meanwhile his office deleted all the text messages they passed while on his team and reformatted their government-issued phones. Maybe Congress should be investigating that obstruction of justice.

Mueller will soon have to face probing questions about his willful blindness, selective investigative focus and history of seeking to cement a legend around dates and persons that fit the collusion/obstruction narrative.
He will also have to explain the murky origins of his investigation, rooted in former FBI Director James Comey’s leak of information from Trump’s FBI files to the New York Times through a professor at Columbia Law School.

Mueller could explain why he chose not to announce that his investigators had found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia until after the 2018 midterm elections, even though his team already knew that Russiagate was a hoax.

And even after the midterms, why did Mueller withhold exculpatory evidence from the nine-page charging document filed with the Michael Cohen plea deal?

What about the fact that Carter Page had acted as an informant for the FBI against Russia?

And what of United States District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich’s opinion from July 1, 2019 that Mueller did not establish a Kremlin connection to the Internet Research Agency (IRA), which the report claimed was the Kremlin’s tool social media campaigns seeking to influence the 2016 election?

What about the leaks to the news media, such as when the Washington Post obtained the March 17, 2019 letter critiquing Attorney General William Barr’s summary of the conclusions of the Mueller report?

Then there are the matters of the Clinton-funded Steele dossier, Fusion GPS and its links to the Justice Department and the genesis of the illicit Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants used to spy on the Trump campaign.

Mueller showed a remarkable lack of curiosity about these issues, and for good reason since the truth would have compromised the entire rationale for the continued legal and political harassment of President Trump. This also goes to the bizarre timing of the Mueller testimony, since we are awaiting the soon-to-be-released report from the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General on potential abuse FISA abuse, which is certain to lay these issues bare. In that respect Mueller and the Democrats are wasting their time, because the OIG report will reveal the unprecedented abuse of government power that drove the collusion myth.

In retrospect the most remarkable thing about the Mueller witch hunt is that even with the deck stacked so solidly against him, Trump emerged from the process clean. The Russiagate hoax was so completely lacking in substance (even the manufactured kind) that Mueller couldn’t take Trump down. Congressional Democrats may think that they can somehow manipulate the upcoming hearings to produce a rationale for obstruction charges. But again, how can there be obstruction when there was never a crime? Maybe Mr. Mueller can answer that one.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...robert-mueller

[reagansghost]

he did take down Trump comrade, couldn't prosecute due to DOJ/OLC policy that forbids indicting a sitting president

oh right...…..how would a Russian national know that, my bad

[dukkha]

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...ate-department
In a key finding of the Mueller report, Ukrainian businessman Konstantin Kilimnik, who worked for Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, is tied to Russian intelligence.

But hundreds of pages of government documents — which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018 — describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny.

[anonymoose]

he did take down Trump

Interesting. I thought he was still president. Shows how uninformed I am.
That's why I come here. I get news I'd never get anywhere else.

[reagansghost]

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...ate-department
In a key finding of the Mueller report, Ukrainian businessman Konstantin Kilimnik, who worked for Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, is tied to Russian intelligence.

But hundreds of pages of government documents — which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018 — describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny.

wanna break down this copy/paste Ivan?

what are you trying to say?

[reagansghost]

Interesting. I thought he was still president. Shows how uninformed I am.
That's why I come here. I get news I'd never get anywhere else.

nice reading comprehension

[dukkha]

wanna break down this copy/paste Ivan?

what are you trying to say?

it's a VERY SIMPLE CONCISE POST..I even outlined the basics -and you still don't get it?

read it slowly,look at the link if need be

[Superfreak]

he did take down Trump comrade, couldn't prosecute due to DOJ/OLC policy that forbids indicting a sitting president

oh right...…..how would a Russian national know that, my bad

LOL... how many times are you morons going to misrepresent what Mueller could have done?

Mueller could have stated he found enough evidence to indict Trump. He could have reached a conclusion. Nothing stopped him from doing so. The indictment simply would have come once Trump was out of office.

[reagansghost]

it's a VERY SIMPLE CONCISE POST..I even outlined the basics -and you still don't get it?

read it slowly,look at the link if need be

you're a troll copy pasting propaganda

go eat your borscht

[reagansghost]

LOL... how many times are you morons going to misrepresent what Mueller could have done?

Mueller could have stated he found enough evidence to indict Trump. He could have reached a conclusion. Nothing stopped him from doing so. The indictment simply would have come once Trump was out of office.

Mueller said he couldn't indict due to DOJ/OLC policy, left that up to his boss Barr

you're retarded

[PostmodernProphet]

Trump didn't violate any laws.......therefore Mueller could not take him down......

[countryboy]

he did take down Trump comrade, couldn't prosecute due to DOJ/OLC policy that forbids indicting a sitting president

oh right...…..how would a Russian national know that, my bad

I one ear, and right out the other, encountering no resistance whatsoever.

[reagansghost]

Trump didn't violate any laws.......

not according to Mueller

[countryboy]

nice reading comprehension

Oh the irony.

[reagansghost]

I one ear, and right out the other, encountering no resistance whatsoever.

when did Mueller clear Trump of Obstruction of Justice?

link?