Democrats think they've got a slam-dunk obstruction case against Trump. They don't.

[reagansghost]

Trump's a big Mueller Rpt fan, obviously agrees with him

[USFREEDOM911]

Yet the committee members ARE lawyers you fucking mental midget.

Meaning...………………………….what??

[dukkha]

Why does the simplest shit need to be broken down for you, moron?

Lawmakers are lawyers, they have no problem reading legalese. Fucking idiot, the only point in your entire wall of text and it is moot.

Stop trolling far right sites, you look like an idiot when you empty your slop buckets here.

wow.. and an actual sentence rather then fragments of what you think you are saying. a vast improvement

[dukkha]

Meaning...………………………….what??

give him some time..at least he got out a stand alone idea..maybe he can belch out the context..maybe

[Superfreak]

Yet the committee members ARE lawyers you fucking mental midget.

Yet they continue with the charade. Which tells you all you need to know about their lack of ethics.

[dukkha]

Democrats will be showcase an investigation that was not obstructed into a crime that investigators could not establish actually happened.

[Superfreak]

Why does the simplest shit need to be broken down for you, moron?

Lawmakers are lawyers, they have no problem reading legalese. Fucking idiot, the only point in your entire wall of text and it is moot.

Stop trolling far right sites, you look like an idiot when you empty your slop buckets here.

Not all lawmakers are lawyers you dolt. Not all lawyers are good at their job. Just look how confused Garud gets on an almost daily basis. He has no grasp of basic law, yet he is a lawyer. Passing exams doesn't make you good at what you do.

Notice you immediately attack the messenger rather than address the points brought up by the article? Yeah... we noticed that too.

[Superfreak]

Attempted obstruction is the same thing as obstruction you useless retard.

No, they are not the same thing. That and the 'attempted obstruction' case is even weak... as the author pointed out.

[Rune]

No, they are not the same thing. That and the 'attempted obstruction' case is even weak... as the author pointed out.

Obstruction does not need to be successful for a finding of guilty.

Shithead.

[reagansghost]

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ase-you-forgot

[Celticguy]

Oh and wasn't there a vote on impeachment just a week ago that failed miserably? hardly any democrats voted for it

When you hot nothin' you got nothin' to lose...

[Superfreak]

Obstruction does not need to be successful for a finding of guilty.

Shithead.

Again moron... the two are not the same thing. Just as attempted murder and murder are not the same thing.

As the author pointed out, even the case for 'attempted obstruction' is weak at best.

[LV426]

Again moron... the two are not the same thing. Just as attempted murder and murder are not the same thing.

As the author pointed out, even the case for 'attempted obstruction' is weak at best.

If that's the case, then why did Trump order McGahn to lie to Congress, and why did he order Cohen to lie to Congress?

Would that not be obstruction of justice, to order a witness to lie to investigators?

[reagansghost]

Just as attempted murder and murder are not the same thing.

.

both class A felonies warranting serious jail time

nice call

[Rune]

Again moron... the two are not the same thing. Just as attempted murder and murder are not the same thing.

As the author pointed out, even the case for 'attempted obstruction' is weak at best.

Both are felonies, both carry the same penalties.