He never mentioned race.
He would have said it about white people too.
Arabic and Mestizo aren't races.
What about what some other person did?
It wasn't racism, it was xenophobia.
They hate America,
dEmS aRe ThE rEaL rAcIsTs.
He wasn't talking about the Squad.
It's not. Telling someone to fix their own socialist country with their socialist ideas instead of ruining our capitalism-based federated republic with their socialist ideas is not racist. StoneByStone has no idea what racism is, since he rejects logic.
When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear. -Thomas Sowell
The most controversial thing I've ever done was to decide to think with my brain instead of my skin color. - Candace Owens
Sure thing. I have already provided it countless times, but I will provide it here once again...
Racism is a compositional error fallacy involving people as the class and a genetic trait as the property.
A fallacy is an error of logic. A compositional error fallacy is the improper extension of a property of an item of a class across other items within that same class or across the class itself.
The "marbles in a bag" example works quite well for illustrating this. Let's say that you pick a marble out of the bag and it is black. Then you pick a second one out and it is also black... A third one is black... A fourth one is black. You then conclude that all the marbles in the bag are black. By doing so, you are improperly extending a property [color] of an item [a marble] of a class [marbles] across other items within the same class [the other marbles inside the bag]. Those other marbles might actually be white, blue, yellow, red, green, etc...
Racism and bigotry are simply specific forms of that same compositional error fallacy. For bigotry, it is the specific form in which people (instead of marbles) are the class. For racism, it is the bigotry mentioned above, but it also includes some sort of genetic trait (such as skin color) as the property.
Yes, I dismiss all "arguments by emoji" on sight, as dismissing an argument as 'absurd' through use of emojis is not valid argumentation. He committed the Argument of the Stone Fallacy, but when people commit that fallacy through use of emojis, I like to refer to it as an "Argument By Emoji".
What racist tweet has Trump made? Do you have a link to it?
It's more than just a random crime, there's a sinister meaning behind it. And check out what happened when this crime was appealed to SCOTUS.
In recent decades the United States Supreme Court has decided two cases involving cross burning – R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003). In each case the defendants were arrested and convicted of a crime for burning a cross, and in each case the Supreme Court reversed the defendants’ convictions. I discuss each of those cases below.
http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/view/103/184
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
StoneByStone (07-30-2019)
"There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."
Bookmarks