US to blister in the sun as hottest global warming weather in years grips region

[archives]

So you disagree with other scientists, but claim you're right.

Putz.

I'll go with the overwhelming majority, especially when entities as NASA supports their findings

[Truth Detector]

I'll go with the overwhelming majority, especially when entities as NASA supports their findings

In other words, you're fine being a gullible dupe.

[Truth Detector]

Amazing how here we are about celebrate NASA's achievement of putting a man on the moon, which many consider the greatest Scientific achievement in the 20th Century, and we got Flat Earthers here are basically telling us that entities as NASA, who support man made climate change, are wrong and don't understand Science

Beautiful

Hang on; so your meme is that if others don't believe in the buffoonish man cause Global warming THEORY that cannot be proven, they are flat earthers?

What planet do you hail from, planet moron? Poor arsecheese, he's stuck in Fascism.

Tell me, what man caused event started the Global melting of the Ice sheets 20,000 years ago?

[Lord Yurt]

I'll go with the overwhelming majority, especially when entities as NASA supports their findings

Science by consensus... How dark ages of you....

[Truth Detector]

Science by consensus... How dark ages of you....

Wasn't the "consensus" in the middle ages that the earth was flat? Poor arsecheese doesn't know when he's been owned. He was born a mental midget.

[archives]

Science does not use consensus. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Science is not a university or scholar.

Science does not require publication in a journal.

* You can't create energy out of nothing. (1st law of thermodynamics).
* You can't decrease entropy in any system (2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't trap heat (2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't trap thermal energy. There is always heat. (1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics).
* you can't trap light (1st law of thermodynamics).
* You can't reduce the radiance of Earth and increase it's temperature at the same time (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

You have no science. You deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. There is no such thing as a 'greenhouse gas'. The 'greenhouse effect' in an open atmosphere is not possible.


Lie. You deny science and mathematics.

YALIF.

For what crime?

He's succeeding.

I am not a farmer. Why do you think farmers are dumb? Bigotry.

I am. I voted for Trump, and will happily do so again.

Got to admit this one is too funny, as I commented once, he could break down anything into articles and prepositions, and you got to laugh when he comes in with the "fallacies,' got no response, "it is the ......... fallacy"

"parrot killer," that is what he is on the climate forums, where I don't believe he makes out any better

But the attempts are entertaining

[archives]

Science by consensus... How dark ages of you....

Did I author consensus?

But if you want to go there, if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and the vast majority of duck specialists in the world say it is a duck, I think common sense dictates that it probably is a duck

[archives]

Wasn't the "consensus" in the middle ages that the earth was flat? Poor arsecheese doesn't know when he's been owned. He was born a mental midget.

Partially, but is was driven by religion and the Church's insistence upon such, we don't have quite the same circumstances today, but thanks for stopping by, always entertaining to read your inanity

[Truth Detector]

Partially, but is was driven by religion and the Church's insistence upon such, we don't have quite the same circumstances today, but thanks for stopping by, always entertaining to read your inanity

^^Doesn't think his posts are inane.

[Lord Yurt]

Did I author consensus?

But if you want to go there, if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and the vast majority of duck specialists in the world say it is a duck, I think common sense dictates that it probably is a duck

You cited it. Apparently you don't know what a citation is.

And the majority of some people once thought blacks were inferior, using your logic, comment sense dictates they are.

Have you graduated high school?

[archives]

^^Doesn't think his posts are inane.

In other words, he can't response to the content, what a surprise

[Truth Detector]

In other words, he can't response to the content, what a surprise

What content did you post? You think this bullshit is content? "Partially, but is was driven by religion and the Church's insistence upon such, we don't have quite the same circumstances today, but thanks for stopping by, always entertaining to read your inanity"

STFU.

[archives]

You cited it. Apparently you don't know what a citation is.

And the majority of some people once thought blacks were inferior, using your logic, comment sense dictates they are.

Have you graduated high school?

Did not author nor cite consensus

What is the "majority of some people?" What people thought at that time was motivated out of racism not logic, man made climate change is based upon logic

And the irony is that you can post nothing showing us how entities as creditable as NASA, and there are hundreds more, are wrong, even Trump's own Administration and the Pentagon acknowledge climate change, even thought the earlier is doing their best to keep it quiet

[archives]

What content did you post? You think this bullshit is content? "Partially, but is was driven by religion and the Church's insistence upon such, we don't have quite the same circumstances today, but thanks for stopping by, always entertaining to read your inanity"

STFU.

Hardly "bullshit," it is true, who did you think persecuted Galileo and led Copernicus to keep his geocentric theory quiet?

You are just showing your knowledge of history is as weak as just about any other field you attempt to post in, content ain't your calling, personal insults and corny copy and pastes are your specialty

[Into the Night]

Got to admit this one is too funny, as I commented once, he could break down anything into articles and prepositions, and you got to laugh when he comes in with the "fallacies,' got no response, "it is the ......... fallacy"

"parrot killer," that is what he is on the climate forums, where I don't believe he makes out any better

But the attempts are entertaining

So you openly deny science and mathematics. You're even proud of it.