Somalia.
You can read about Deadwood or San Francisco.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Your usual horse shit, when you have nothing to say, StY.
And you ignored Deadwood and San Francisco.
In the mining west, compare the mining towns' government to that of the Mormons in Utah. For the first decade, the Mormons had generally let business and the people do as they wish on Main and State Street until about 1860. Terrible environment for civilians, then the city government clamped down and regulated business and society. Much cleaner, much safer, much more sensible.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
no, the usual horseshit is idiots trying to hold somalia as an example of libertarianism. complete idiocy on your part.
why are you using the LDS as an example against libertarianism? more idiocy. instead of using the BS talking points for hating freedom, go and actually learn about Libertarianism.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
IOW, StY has nothing, other than the usual assertion that libertarianism is "good."
It's not.
The LDS tried libertarianism in the first decade and it endangered the community
Last edited by jimmymccready; 07-22-2019 at 06:48 AM.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
the thing that's total horseshit is thinking that only government can guarantee freedom LOL
how'd that work for the founders?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Lie. You have put yourself in another paradox. You are being irrational now.
It does not have authority to.
It does not need 'interpretation'. It is plainly written.
Immigration is part of naturalization, dumbass.
No. YOU are attempting to redefine what 'naturalization' means.
The court does not have authority to interpret or change the Constitution.
WRONG. It means the court is interpreting the law, not the Constitution. The law MUST conform to the Constitution.
Yes it does.
Yes it does.
Lie. Yes there are.
No. It involves interpreting the law being challenged only. The court does not have authority to interpret the Constitution.
It is about the substantive right.
Anyone is qualified to talk about case law. YOU don't get to decide who can talk about case law.
Carrying a weapon is not brandishing it. Carrying a sword is not brandishing it.
That is brandishing. You might very well get shot. It is a lethal threat.
Yes. It is an immediate lethal threat.
Not a problem.
Only because it is careless handling of the weapon.
No. The right of self defense is inherent.
Yes it would. Good for you.
Yes it would. Good for you.
No, he is not. It's called a 'veto'.
Yes there is. The States themselves, or the people.
Nothing.
Yes it does.
The court does not have authority to interpret the Constitution.
Context please. Void argument fallacy.
Jefferson is correct on that matter.
The court does not have authority to interpret the Constitution.
...?
To a certain degree, yes.
It is. That is up to the States to decide if he is or is not, or to the people.
Bookmarks