They share views with liberals (social issues/civil liberties) and conservatives (economic issues).
You said "Libertarianism is a political pathology that endangers us all." That means the liberal elements and conservative elements libertarians share with both are both political pathologies.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
It does not usurp authority, it performs the function of interpreting the document which is often written in broad and vague terms. The Constitution obviously does not interpret itself or there would not be legal debates over these issues.
For example, when you claim the power to make laws regarding naturalization include the power over immigration, that is not in the Constitution. You are discovering it in some broader definition of the document; in other words, you are changing what the Constitution actually says and giving it greater power then the specific wording. That is why it requires court interpretation.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Libertarianism does not seek to dominate anybody. They seek the greatest amount of economic and social freedom. Do the social elements liberals share with libertarians seek to dominate the weak?
Communist theory also does not seek to dominate the weak. But it has always existed in nations with authoritarian political cultures and never reached its utopian goals.
That means the courts are interpreting the Constitution by choosing to dismiss cases they interpret as based on an unconstitutional law.
That does not solve the problem of presidential actions and legislative laws that do not involve cases brought before the courts. If the president issued an unconstitutional executive order or Congress passed an unconstitutional governmental program (ACC) there are no cases brought to the courts.
The only cases would be suits challenging the constitutionality of those acts and that involves court interpretation of the Constitution.
Bookmarks