You have the attention span of a 3year old. Your post:
“i'm still waiting for any historical documentation from any of the framers or commentators at that time that refer to a well regulated militia as anything but the people with their own arms”.
I just gave you that documentation from the AUTHOR of the 2nd, idiot.
How does a conscientious objector clause apply to all people? It doesn’t, moron.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
so you're trying to say that your one single piece of documentation far outweighs the dozens of others that have been offered as proof????? and you did NOT provide that documentation, you only inferred it...........so you really didn't prove shit. that's your MO though, you spout a bunch of wishful bullshit and try to bluff your way through it.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
who beat the british?
now why do you think it is that the major parties work so hard to politically divide us? as long as we fight each other, they can easily control us...............but they do know that if we the people ever united, government wouldn't stand a chance. that makes you wrong.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
USFREEDOM911 (07-19-2019)
France.
I know, it's heartbreaking, but the real reason we got independence was because the British were at war with the French and they felt that it wasn't worth holding on to the Colonies while they were fighting against such a big threat.
Now that I do agree with, but that has nothing to do with guns. Like I said, democratic elections help influence government. If the population wants freedom of speech, then it will be very difficult for a president or a political party to take away freedom of speech.now why do you think it is that the major parties work so hard to politically divide us? as long as we fight each other, they can easily control us...............but they do know that if we the people ever united, government wouldn't stand a chance. that makes you wrong.
Bookmarks