texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

[SmarterthanYou]

The author of the Second included a conscientious objector clause. How does that apply to civilians?

and as you are so fond of pointing out that 'inalienable rights' don't exist in the constitution, that conscientious clause doesn't exist in the 2nd............therefore there isn't one.

[StoneByStone]

I wish you would wake up.

But I like sleeping late.

[SmarterthanYou]

Says who, “vehicles cannot be necessary”? A fool of your stature?

nope, SCOTUS actually said that in marbury v. madison...............that case you're choosing to pin your belief that SCOTUS is the ultimate arbiter.

[SmarterthanYou]

It sure is proof, dumbfuck. You’re just too stupid to realize it.

so if you say SCOTUS is your proof, cite the part of article 3 in the US Constitution that gives SCOTUS that power

[SmarterthanYou]

That's a false dichotomy. The truth is, muh constitution has never protected our rights. We can keep them and continue ignoring them, or we can just throw them away, won't make much of a difference.

so if the constitution doesn't protect our rights.......what, or who, does?

[SmarterthanYou]

This is going WAY over your head, Jethro.

Where is the “absolute” right to speech, moron?

Another humiliating loss for you. You’re on a roll, “vehicles cannot be necessary”.

you need to make up your mind.........are you going to use the law or the constitution to justify your idiocy. nobody can argue with your stupidity if you're not going to be consistent

[SmarterthanYou]

SCOTUS can always overturn a decision, idiot.

is there an entity that is higher than SCOTUS that can overrule them?

What consecutive loss is this for you this morning? Is it 10 yet?

it looks like i'm the one winning, delusional one.

[StoneByStone]

so if the constitution doesn't protect our rights.......what, or who, does?

Ultimately the government does, but we can influence government through elections. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but all we can do is keep trying.

[SmarterthanYou]

Ultimately the government does, but we can influence government through elections. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but all we can do is keep trying.

so when the government fails to protect our rights...what's left? plain tyranny?

[domer76]

nope, SCOTUS actually said that in marbury v. madison...............that case you're choosing to pin your belief that SCOTUS is the ultimate arbiter.

Marbury established SCOTUS as the final arbiter, dumbfuck.

You’re OH-FOR.

[StoneByStone]

so when the government fails to protect our rights...what's left? plain tyranny?

Pretty much. Which is why it's so important that we don't allow a culture of Fascism to take root in the first place.
And now you know why Batman is punching Trump.

[Truth Detector]

But I like sleeping late.

[Truth Detector]

Ultimately the government does, but we can influence government through elections. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but all we can do is keep trying.

Government does not. Government is a necessary evil that should be minimized. The Constitution is that limiting document. BUT, without the right to bear arms, a Government can usurp those rights and institute tyranny which is why we have a second amendment.

[Truth Detector]

so when the government fails to protect our rights...what's left? plain tyranny?

Correct.

[Truth Detector]

Pretty much. Which is why it's so important that we don't allow a culture of Fascism to take root in the first place.
And now you know why Batman is punching Trump.

Trump couldn't be further from Fascism. But the leftist ideology is all about Fascism; shutting down speech, shouting down the opposition by methods like race baiting, taking guns away, passing laws from the bench instead of through legislation....etc etc etc.

I do wish you were educated. Really I do.