Page 24 of 35 FirstFirst ... 1420212223242526272834 ... LastLast
Results 346 to 360 of 511

Thread: texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

  1. #346 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,482
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH; so if a bunch of young men walk in to a resturant and their pants are sagging, they're doing it because they know it's "likely to alarm" people.

    YEAH, let's go down this slippery slope.
    better yet, what about hoodies???? they are 'likely' to alarm........right?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  2. #347 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    All laws are made out of thin air, nature boy
    Well...sometimes THICK air, depending how many of the lawmakers are smoking cigars at the time.

  3. #348 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,482
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So they have been doing it illegally for the last two hundred plus years?
    yes they have. it's why judges do everything they can to deter nullification........so they can keep their usurped power
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  4. #349 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Thanks for confirming your multiple ass kickings.

    Where did I claim a right, stupid shit? I merely outed you on your idiotic claim that “vehicles cannot be necessary” in modern societies.

    Tell us again, Einstooge. How does your supermarket get the food that you purchase? Horse and buggy?

    Forum idiot.
    Driving a vehicle is not a right, and yes, some stores DO get their supplies by horse and buggy. Have you forgotten the Amish?

  5. #350 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    yes they have. it's why judges do everything they can to deter nullification........so they can keep their usurped power
    So you are telling us now the SCOTUS has been acting illegally and unconstitutionally for the last two hundred plus years?

  6. #351 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So they have been doing it illegally for the last two hundred plus years?
    They haven't. Compositional error fallacy.
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    (Do you think you can break that down by articles and prepositions to muddle and avoid the question?)
    You want to avoid muddle by introducing muddle????

  7. #352 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Do you really think citizens having guns would prevent tyranny? Through history, that hasn't been the case.
    Maybe Madison honestly believed guns would protect us from tyranny, but if so, he was wrong.
    Would you like to refer back to 1776, regarding you comment of "Do you really think citizens having guns would prevent tyranny"??
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. #353 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,482
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So you are telling us now the SCOTUS has been acting illegally and unconstitutionally for the last two hundred plus years?
    of course. so has congress and the executive branch. we haven't had a government that operated within the confines of the constitution since the alien and sedition act came in to effect. its never been corrected because the left and the right are torn between big government to use against their politican enemies and fear of freedom
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #354 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 761 Times in 537 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 21 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    Fire up another doob, stoner. You’ll think your more intelligent, but the rest of us still recognize you as a fucking brain dead moron.

    Go eat a fucking Butterfinger, doper.
    Still avoiding my questions you two bit loser.

    All you do is insult. You have no actual content regarding any issue being discussed.

    I believe such people are called trolls.

  10. #355 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,482
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Would you like to refer back to 1776, regarding you comment of "Do you really think citizens having guns would prevent tyranny"??
    I pointed that out to him. Did you know that France won our independence? we didn't do anything i guess
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  11. #356 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    They haven't. Compositional error fallacy.

    You want to avoid muddle by introducing muddle????
    In other words, you can't answer the question, shocking, and that ain't any fallacy

    And by the way, emojis, unless you are an adolescent girl, are really really corny

  12. #357 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 761 Times in 537 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 21 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So you are telling us now the SCOTUS has been acting illegally and unconstitutionally for the last two hundred plus years?
    There is actually a valid argument for that POV. One that will never win, however, it has been established as a valid argument.

    I suggest you start with Marbury v Madison.

    I rarely agree with STY, but he knows case law and the Constitution. Educate yourself before you debate him again.

  13. #358 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    of course. so has congress and the executive branch. we haven't had a government that operated within the confines of the constitution since the alien and sedition act came in to effect. its never been corrected because the left and the right are torn between big government to use against their politican enemies and fear of freedom
    I'd love to see an explanation on that one, tell us, how have all three branches of Gov't have been actively acting illegally since 1798? And provide examples, not just generalizations

  14. #359 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 761 Times in 537 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 21 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    I'd love to see an explanation on that one, tell us, how have all three branches of Gov't have been actively acting illegally since 1798? And provide examples, not just generalizations
    Are all governments legal?

  15. #360 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Yurt View Post
    There is actually a valid argument for that POV. One that will never win, however, it has been established as a valid argument.

    I suggest you start with Marbury v Madison.

    I rarely agree with STY, but he knows case law and the Constitution. Educate yourself before you debate him again.
    You didn't answer the question, I know what John Marshall did, and I haven't been debating the other guy here since page two, just jumped in when the Constitutional questions arose

Similar Threads

  1. Court: Texas can enforce more of 'sanctuary cities' law
    By Pappy Jones in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-26-2017, 05:04 AM
  2. APP - What if Texas just ignores the Supreme Court?
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-01-2016, 10:18 AM
  3. Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion access law
    By Leonthecat in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-27-2016, 06:50 PM
  4. Tom DeLay conviction overturned by Texas court
    By StormX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-22-2013, 02:51 PM
  5. 'Next Bush' makes campaign filing in Texas
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-09-2012, 01:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •