new asylum policy....

[PostmodernProphet]

The Trump administration is moving forward with a tough new asylum rule in its campaign to slow the flow of Central American migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. Asylum-seeking immigrants who pass through a third country en route to the U.S. must first apply for refugee status in that country rather than at the U.S. border.

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/74176...pply-elsewhere
problem solved?......

[jimmymccready]

The written and passed law is the guideline not executive branch orders.

[anonymoose]

The written and passed law is the guideline not executive branch orders.

Are you also for enforcing the written and passed law for immigration?

[Jack]

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/74176...pply-elsewhere
problem solved?......

'Zero Immigration'. Problem solved.

[Earl]

'Zero Immigration'. Problem solved.

I rarely agree with you, Jack, but I do on this one. Our cities are clogged with traffic, crime and noise pollution. Time to put up the no vacancy sign. It IS our country and we determine the number of immigrants allowed in OUR country.

[PostmodernProphet]

The written and passed law is the guideline not executive branch orders.

sorry, but executive orders are legal and effective.....

[Jack]

I rarely agree with you, Jack, but I do on this one. Our cities are clogged with traffic, crime and noise pollution. Time to put up the no vacancy sign. It IS our country and we determine the number of immigrants allowed in OUR country.

Yes Earl. We rarely agree. We may have reached a similar conclusion but for different reasons.
Blue Team seems to agree that the US needs MORE people. Claims that the US needs MORE people so the Old can live off the back of the Young, not really considering that MORE 'Human Activity' causes destruction of the Planet. Blue Team claims they accept the IDEA that 'Human Activity' is destroying the Planet, but can't quite put that together with the idea of importing MORE people.

[jimmymccready]

OK, Earl, you are talking geo-cultural sense not politics.

There is room for discussion.

[jimmymccready]

Are you also for enforcing the written and passed law for immigration?

Of course, allow asylum seeks full access to portals with guaranteed clean and healthy centers.

Deport those who have deportation orders that they have ignored.

[anonymoose]

Of course, allow asylum seeks full access to portals with guaranteed clean and healthy centers.

Deport those who have deportation orders that they have ignored.

Not sure we can guarantee the first when they are overwhelmed. As to the second , good. You seem to be in the minority of progs on that.

[Gonzomin]

Are you also for enforcing the written and passed law for immigration?

You are not. They are allowed to apply for asylum and then prove their case in court.

[Truth Detector]

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/74176...pply-elsewhere
problem solved?......

It is a move in the right direction.

[Truth Detector]

The written and passed law is the guideline not executive branch orders.

Executive orders never seemed to bother you lying leftist hypocrites when Obama was in office.

Obama says he's prepared to act without Congress in State of the Union address

[Truth Detector]

You are not. They are allowed to apply for asylum and then prove their case in court.

ONLY if they enter a port of entry snowflake; not by swimming the Rio Grande and entering ILLEGALLY. How hard is this for low IQ leftists?

[cawacko]

I rarely agree with you, Jack, but I do on this one. Our cities are clogged with traffic, crime and noise pollution. Time to put up the no vacancy sign. It IS our country and we determine the number of immigrants allowed in OUR country.

So tell the best and brightest around the world to go start their businesses in other countries. How does that benefit us?