181. Soup (11/21)
Poisoning is a traditional method to murder. There is no exception for Feds. But they do it in different way. They made it more like a natural disease or sometimes, directly plant virus or germ to the victims.
Sometime about 92 (? If I can't remember the exact time, I put a "?") my wife started to suggest me to go to the restaurant which Mr. X owned. Mr. X was a seller in Flea market. I thought he was an informant of Feds so I refused. My wife kept suggesting to go to Mr. X's restaurant although she knew I didn't like him and that restaurant was far away from our house. Her repeating suggestion caused my suspicion. What was it for?
One day when I was having meal with my wife, she took out two cups of soup. She gave me one "This beef soup is for you. I have that WonTon soup. I bought them from Mr. X's restaurant."
The long accumulated suspicion broke out. I was angry. "You know my opinion about Mr.X. Why are you keeping request me to eat his food? Is there something in the soup? You drink it." I pushed the beef soup cup to her.
My wife didn't say a word. She sat there, lowered her head, dare not to watch me. When I urged her " drink it, why you dare not drink it?" She had a strange reaction. She held a piece of chopstick, soaked it into the beef soup, then slowly put the chopstick into her mouth. She might drink a drop of soup or even less. Obviously she was forced to do so. So she herself suspected the soup might have been poisoned. That's the only way she could do then. Looked like tasting a little soup.
After my anger relaxed, I realized my wife was forced to do so. I hurried finish the meal. Left her behind to take care of that full cup of beef soap. Later when I got familiar with Feds tactic, I know that even she drank the whole cup of soup. Nothing would happen.
182. Sandwich
when I went to Galt Market every Tuesday then, I used to buy my lunch a day before from a Vietnamese food store. The customers were Asian people because the food was traditional Asian style. So it caught my eye when I saw a white man in sandwich cabinet whom was talking with sales ladies. The white man left right away when he saw me coming in. I felt it was unusual because he left without buying anything.
I told the sales ladies I want three sandwiches. The sales ladies looked flurried, turned their sights away and walked away to take care other customers whom came later. I was left alone for a few minutes. It was a deliberate negligence, I was angry. Then another saleslady just coming from other room picked my order. She took three already made sandwiches from a saving cabinet for me. It was unusual because they always made it on order. (customer could choose different meat and vegetables) The odd things puzzled me. It seemed they got these sandwiches particularly prepared for me.
Next day, after a busy morning, I was hungry. Looking at the sandwiches, I recalled the strange scene the day before and beef soup event. Did they put some poison in sandwich? I tried a small bite, taste is normal, than another bite.... I finished a sandwich, threw away the other two and waited for something to happen. Nothing happened.
It was contradict to my suspicion of poisoning. The above two events puzzled me for sometime. What happened exactly?
183. Imminent threat (11/23)
I break the sequence to write this. I think D.o.J. and FBI now may try to plant computer crime on me after they failed the other framing attemption.
In late October, my wife's brother came here to visit his cancer sickened father. He is a business man trading second hand computers and softwares. When he came to my house. He did two things. First, he talked about US dollars that it would devalue so it was better to change US dollar into other currency. Then he used my computer to check E-bay to see if his merchandise had been sold. He told me it was easy to make money in internet trading. I thought he was manipulated by Feds to influence me. I got used to this kind of tactics. 1. It's just like Isotope money, a method to detect how much money target have so they can loot. 2. Feds wish I do business in internet.
I don't care much about devalue US dollar because I am not rich. But I am sensitive to that internet business suggestion. I felt in advance Feds would use internet crime to frame me. This was another effort they try push me into the trap.
For a long time I was accused of spamming to post this thread because I post in many different sites. The accusation of spamming is unreasonable. Would Bush be a spammer if many web sites posting his speech of State Union? Or is the same book appear in different libraries a spam?
A few months ago, the spamming accusations on me suddenly disappeared. At the same time I saw many articles in Mercury News blaming spam and demand strict law against it. Since media is controlled by intelligence. I always can testify the intention of inside group. And this time they want an anti-spamming law for their private purpose to frame their dislike. Of course they got the law passed locally and nationally. Among them, the anti-spamming law in California is the most strict one.
Though I don't do any business in internet, I fear Feds will plant a framming case on me. They have such ability and resource.
I said I was under 24 hours surveillance by Feds. I was harassed by their cyber space team. I have reason to allege them doing so.
1. Long time ago, I logged in each forum automatically if I chose the function box of automatic log in. Now I failed most of them. So each time I have to manually log in. It may prove that my computer is under control of another server. I must enter internet through that server. So the automatic log in is defuntioned.
2. Because my messages missing frequently, I record them each time I post so I can track later. I noticed such a phenomenon. After I posting a message, the number of viewer column always increased by 2 not one. (e.g. when the view total was 100 before I click the thread, after I sent the message, it became 102 not 101) Which means there is another computer or server was on the thread synchro- locked with my computer. This observation never failed. It works automatically.
3. The monitor agent often communicate with me through forum mostly with malicious ridicules. So I often got an instant reply. Once they had made a mistake that their reply even posted before I posted mine. (when I finished writing and left for something else before posting it.) So I knew they can see the same view in my screen.
4. In early time when I just started to post in internet, (about year 2000 and 2001), I found my thread was filtered off from other readers. I discovered it when I enter the forum as a guest. I couldn't find my thread. But the thread appeared if I logged in with my name. So a person maybe cheated that he is in a discuss forum while in fact no other people is able to see his messages. It takes place when his computer is under the control of another special server which filters it from the connection to internet. I proved this by using another line.
I went to T's computer. (Tenant who rented my room then) He had a seperate phone line. With his permission I used his user's name to go to the site. I couldn't find my thread. T, faced the fact, admitted it was possible I was under FBI surveillance. (Though I alleged he is an Chinese undercover, too.)
I was puzzled at that time if they could control my computer, they can control T's computer too. So their secret won't been discovered. It was easy to switch the line connection for them. Until they pushed through "Patriot Act" I knew why. Originally, FBI must got Judge's permission to monitor suspect's phone line. It limited the only line suspect using. So when I tested in T's line, their trick was revealed. That's why they demand a vast power of electronical surveillance in "Patriot Act". They succeeded. Now Feds can abuse their power to harass people without judge's permission at the reason only they suspicious. The "Patriot Act" does little to terrorism but vastly hurt civil liberty and cover up the corruption of D.o. J.
Since I am very careful not to fall in trap they set up. How can Feds frame me in internet frame case?
Planting.
5. Spread fake messages assuming my name and use my internet address. See "132. plant fake petition.(5/22)", "127. Heavy harassment (5/3)".
6. Assuming my internet address. Technically they have no problem to send fake messages from my address and use my phone line. They have done so before. Several times I was banned from web-sites. After my protest, the web host said it was a mistake. Because they found someone else in same server address of mine sent harassing messages. Here is one example: (Host's explanation)
<http://www.funtrivia.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=UBB24&Number=207635&pa ge=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&vc=1> #207714 - 12/24/02 11:14 AM Edit Reply Quote
"Actually kathaksung wasn't banned, it only appeared that he had been and had the same effect as if he had been. It was another person who was actually banned but who was on the same IP address, that IP address has now been unbanned as it covered more than one person. Had kathaksung e-mailed Gunslinger about it the matter would have been sorted out."
I felt it was an imminient threat because recently, my wife wants to install broad band DSL. Because with which several people can go to internet at same time, I fear Feds may take the chance to plant fake messages on me and rejected the idea.
Then three days ago, a telephone company mail showed my wife installed a new phone line without my awareness. I had a discussion with my wife but failed to persuade her abandoning the new phone line. I think it's a Fed's manipulation. It makes a plant possible. Even if I am home alone and surfing in internet, they could accuse that criminal messages sent from another computer from another line was from the same house and I am the only person in the house. (My daughter has another computer)
Two days ago, news from World Journal "Federal sweep computer crime, 125 arrested"
A.G. Ashcroft announced on Oct 20 that government in "Operation Cyber Sweep" they arrested 125 cyberspace criminals, including hackers, ID thief and other swindlers. Suspects also include those immitate software, illegal selling Honour Medals in internet, or invading web site to send patriot information.
Combine all these with crazy persecution, I feel this time D.o.J. will plant cyber space crime to frame me. I announce here I won't do any business in internet, or do anything threatening others or illegal things in internet except the thread in forum to reveal the corrupt and criminal things committed by government. I don't send any private e-mail to anyone except the e-mail to host if harassing happened.
D.o.J. and Ashcroft are crazy. Their eagerness to frame me may reveal their fear. One of the reasons I think is: a coming explosion of housing bubble.
184. Jobless recovery (12/1)
About as early as 2000 or 2001, when I logged in to the forum of Delphi group, I noticed the loggin name sometimes became kathaksun1, or kathaksun2. I have never used such a user's name. At that time I had no knowledge of spamming or someone assuming my name. I thought it might be the software error of Delphi. And if I was able to log in automatically, I didn't care much of it.
A week ago, I was refused from visiting Savant society which is a member of Delphi group. The reason is I have more than one user's name. They listed the above 2 and another one. I do have another user's name, sungkathak. Because when I was banned for no reason, I had to log in with another name to complain. But kathaksun1 and kathaksun2 are not mine. I've posted in Savant society for more than a year, never had a problem. Why they suddenly made trouble for me on this issue?
It took place at the same time of "cyberspace crime" threat. The two names, originally were used by agents monitoring on me, I think. And the names might have been used to post harassing articles, which had caused me being banned from many forums. Now they intend to use it to frame a cyberspace crime.
--------------
My wife suddenly ordered another telephone line, telephone company got it connected, but because the plug of phone line (inside house) is broken and my wife doesn't know how to fix it. So the line was still not used.
Why does Feds want a new phone line? Technically they have no problem to plant on the line I'm using. Because in that old line, there are plenty of my messages revealing how Feds frame a case, include "cyberspace crime". How could they make jury or judge believe their word with such evidence? With a new line, with no other record except their "evidence", they can frame a case.
The pressure on my wife is so heavy that she threatened to move out and now it's "divorce" to me. Why Feds is so eager to finish this case even using a rogue's way? I think it's the 2004 president election.
Bush is a favorite of inside group. They want him to stay for the 2nd term. But he did nothing good. So the only way inside group can do is to give him a prosperous economy. That's why media beat the drum to propaganda the economy is recovering "Growth is now super-super strong compared to super strong,'', "U.S. 3rd-Qtr GDP Grew at 8.2% Rate, Fastest Since '84". Do you feel this super-super strong recovery? Pay-check raised? Employment fully? Or only impression from media?
A fully recovery means high employment, rising income. Company must expand their business. All these need capital, will cause a rising interest in financial market. But FBI is holding a large amount of real estate property. Any interest rising will increase their monthly payment to the loan, and will also cause a housing market price collapse. Nothing can hurt Feds' interest. So Federal interest maintains at 1%. And Bush administration can only invent a new word," jobless recovery". But jobless recovery can't cheat people. That's why I am persecuted so violently.
185. How hard they worked to maintain Bush's fame.
Inside group tried their best to keep Bush's fame. It reflected how they prepared for Bush's state visit to London.
Bush's Britain visit is a controversial one. And was opposed by most Britons. British government and Royal family were reluctant to entertain such a notorious guest. so they were intimidated. Bush is a proxy of Israel, he has done good to Israel by activate Iraq war, he should have an honorable trip according to that interest group. Then we see how high ranking of Great Britain bent to the pressure. 1. The leaking of information that Princess Diana's death was designed by British intelligence and Royal family. That targets at British intelligence. 2. Tony Blair went to hospital for heart trouble. Target at P.M. 3. News of Prince Charles's scandal with his servant. Target at Royal family. All these took place at the time just before Bush's visit. And Great Britain obeyed.
Bush had a glorious state visit. He stayed in Royal's palace in London and welcomed by Royal family. And "Guardian" issued a so said poll "Majority welcome Bush's visit" which was spread vastly in internet by intelligence accessaries. All this is the result of work of intelligence.
At same time, they also threw out the news of Michael Jackson's molesting case to divert public's attention on how Bush was protested by Britons. That's the tactic intelligence used to do, if you are familiar with them. ( see "64. My Brother in law was targetted." how they use McVeigh's execution to divert a framed drug case)
Bookmarks