Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

[Into the Night]

So then you think mars has enough water vapor to form clouds due to cosmic rays? LOL

Good. You caught it.

Mars does indeed have water, but it's sparse and locked away in ice. What sublimates to the atmosphere produces a humidity that is less than Earth's driest deserts.

One of the conditions of formation of clouds by cosmic rays is sufficient humidity. There is one another condition on Mars that is different from Earth that affects such cloud formation. Can you name it?

[Althea]

Zerohedge:

Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website.

It's always amazing how deep they must dig to find this nonsense.

[tinfoil]

Good. You caught it.

Mars does indeed have water, but it's sparse and locked away in ice. What sublimates to the atmosphere produces a humidity that is less than Earth's driest deserts.

That's why I scoffed at your cosmic ray mars/earth juxtaposition. Clearly apples and oranges

[Althea]

Zerohedge:

Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website.

Monsanto funded 'studies' for years. Now they're losing in court.

[Althea]

The usual Flat Earther "arguement," they attempt to create a false paradigm, introduce some study from usually a questionable source as if it or dozens like it were going to cancel out the thousands of other studies validating man made climate change. Cook alone surveyed over fourteen thousand research projects to come up with the ninety seven percent, and now this study, or the dozens others like it, are going to negate all of those other studies? Common sense takes precedent

Been there, done that, nothing new

Consider the OP

[Into the Night]

Step (1) call them deniers! Despite no one actually denying climate or changes to it.

Step (2) Appeal really really really hard to authority. Call them 'experts'. Pretend they have track records that are actually good.

Step (3) belittle the actual scientists that debunk the cultist AGW morons with facts rather than emotional nonsense



Yes moron... the question is what is the impact. Why do the cultists continue to find ways to adjust data from the 1870-1950 range down and data is adjusted up for more recent 1950-current time frames? Why do their computer models continue to fail? Why have we seen no significant warming for almost 20 years, despite CO2 continuing to increase?

Bottom line, lemmings like Cypress will believe anything his masters tell him to believe. He is incapable of rational thought.

I have to take issue with (1).

I deny 'climate change' has any meaning, therefore I deny any changes are possible to a climate.

I do not deny there are different climates, but 'climate' itself is a subjective term. It has no quantifiable value. There is no way to describe a 'change' for there is no way to describe how much 'change' has occurred.

Earth simply has different climates. There is no global climate, for there is no global weather. Where a desert happens to form on Earth might change, but a desert climate is still a desert climate.

[Althea]

Money pays for a lot of 'stuff' in the land of reality. And, these alchemists have been on the dole for a long time.

Yes. Big Oil funds many similar studies.

[Into the Night]

That's why I scoffed at your cosmic ray mars/earth juxtaposition. Clearly apples and oranges

Yes. They are. I was hoping to get Cypress (who brought up the argument in this forum) to come to terms with this, but it seems he won't deal with defending it.

Since you did not guess what the other factor between Mars and Earth that affects cloud formation is, the answer is simply temperature of formation. Clouds will not form without a drop in temperature. It takes energy for cosmic nucleation of a cloud. The cosmic ray itself provides some, but the rest comes from the air around and within the cloud. The effect is very small, but it's there.

Clouds on Earth, however, form simply by convective heating, a far more powerful method than cosmic rays.

[Althea]

sez procurer of sex worker from Thailand

Sad...huh?

[Into the Night]

Monsanto funded 'studies' for years. Now they're losing in court.

In Kalifornia. Big Deal. They think everything in Kalifornia causes cancer.

Fortunately, Kalifornia has found another very effective weed killer: wildfires.

[Into the Night]

Yes. Big Oil funds many similar studies.

Studies of what? Void argument fallacy.

[moon]

I guess the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law mean nothing to you, eh?

No.
* You can't create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).
* You can't decrease entropy in any system (2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't heat the surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't slow or trap heat (1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics).
* You can't slow or trap light (1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics and Plancks law).
* You can't reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature the same time (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. There is no such thing as a 'greenhouse gas'.

Don't need Judith. All I need are the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which you deny, just like your climate 'scientists' deny.

None. Zip. Zero. Nada. Nul. No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth.

I see you, troll. Haw, haw......................haw.

[Superfreak]

Yes. Big Oil funds many similar studies.

Big government funds even more

[cancel2 2022]

Sad...huh?

Hadn't thought of you as a nasty racist cunt, but I do now!!

[cancel2 2022]

Big government funds even more

They like to forget that Obama was pumping in several billion per year to fund 'climate research' dwarfing anything that Big Oil funded.