Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 289101112131415 LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 224

Thread: Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

  1. #166 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Did they come with the standard package, or did you pay extra?
    Moved from common or garden cunt list to supremely nasty racist cunt list.

  2. #167 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    NASA says you're a wanker, maggot

    https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/


    Nice pretty graph of random numbers.

    It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric CO2. CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. The Mauna Loa station didn't exist before 1958. They are also cooking their data. It is useless.

  3. #168 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,835
    Thanks
    6,474
    Thanked 3,778 Times in 3,065 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Climate change means a changing climate.
    A circular definition... Meaningless.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Climate is recorded by paleoclimatologists.
    Another meaningless term, as "climate change" is not defined...

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Global weather
    Weather is not global. There is no such thing as 'global weather'.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    is monitored by global weather stations
    There cannot be stations measuring something which doesn't exist.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    and the data
    There cannot be data for something which doesn't exist.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    contributes to a pattern
    Non-existence does not yield patterns.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    of global climate over time.
    Climate is not global. There is no such thing as a 'global climate'.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    These are very simple and accepted fundamentals.
    Those 'fundamentals' are nonsense.

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    You morons can't even troll properly. Haw, haw...........................haw.
    This applies to YOU, not 'deniers'...

  4. #169 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    NASA ? maggot ? Difficult choice . Haw, haw.......................................haw.
    Satellites are incapable of measuring an absolute temperature. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. You are ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law again, and even arguing a paradox.

    1) infrared light is trapped by CO2 and does not reach space
    2) infrared light is visible to satellites. It is not trapped by CO2 and does reach space.

    Which is it, dude?

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Into the Night For This Post:

    anonymoose (07-18-2019), Stretch (07-18-2019)

  6. #170 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    For all your projection, you still haven't learned to read past the titles of your offerings.
    His basic argument is that these factors are not zero, which is true. It is known that these factors will cause nucleation in a Wilson cloud chamber. These factors are pretty minor, but they ARE there.

    But the major factor in cloud formation on Earth is none of these. Clouds on Earth simply form from convective heat and a bit of available humidity in the air. Any kind of dust or even radiation from the Sun (which is a LOT stronger than that from cosmic rays!) will trigger the actual nucleation itself.

    The reason we remember Wilson and his cloud chamber machine today is because Wilson accidentally created a machine that allowed us to see, for the first time, the nuclei of atoms being split, which means we can see what we're doing when we are trying to split the atom. Made atomic power and nuclear research much easier that way!

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Into the Night For This Post:

    dukkha (07-18-2019), Stretch (07-18-2019)

  8. #171 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Kartoon Kenny strikes again.
    He does manage to find some good ones, even if it's to support his religion.

  9. #172 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    I love how liberals insist their "scientists" are smarter than ours
    Haven't you heard? Conservatives have no scientists!

    I'm glad that science is just a set of falsifiable theories, and isn't even scientists or people at all.

  10. #173 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    44,902
    Thanks
    9,713
    Thanked 7,400 Times in 5,849 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,395 Times in 6,142 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Haven't you heard? Conservatives have no scientists!

    I'm glad that science is just a set of falsifiable theories, and isn't even scientists or people at all.
    You're simply a moron troll.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  11. #174 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    44,902
    Thanks
    9,713
    Thanked 7,400 Times in 5,849 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,395 Times in 6,142 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Warming Oceans
    The oceans have absorbed much of this increased heat, with the top 700 meters (about 2,300 feet) of ocean showing warming of more than 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1969.

    https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

    No shit ! NASA ? maggot ? I'm still thinking. Haw, haw......................haw.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  12. #175 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,825
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,985 Times in 3,359 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 636 Times in 604 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    idiot.. it's reporting on the study
    -do you need more sources or do you just want to stay stupid?
    What study is it reporting on? It isn't published. It isn't peer reviewed. It is a piece of garbage they uploaded to a website.

    For a scientific critique of the unpublished paper you claim is a "study" you can go here:
    https://climatefeedback.org/claimrev...lobal-warming/

    As to the rest of the garbage from Zerohedge, they pull quotes from unrelated articles and pretend they are from scientific papers they are not from.

    The paper by the Kobe scientists can be found here:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45466-8
    It doesn't support anything in the unpublished paper and says nothing about current climate change. The quote mining from the paper by zerohedge is specious at best, outright fraud by zerohedge seems to be more likely.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Poor Richard Saunders For This Post:

    domer76 (07-18-2019)

  14. #176 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    No shit ! NASA ? maggot ? I'm still thinking. Haw, haw......................haw.
    Not very hard, obviously. It's not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth's oceans. Not even NASA can do that.

  15. #177 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Nice pretty graph of random numbers.

    It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric CO2. CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. The Mauna Loa station didn't exist before 1958. They are also cooking their data. It is useless.
    "They are also cooking their data," tells the reader where this contributor comes from, anything he doesn't like is going to be "cooking the data"

    Ask him what is Science and how it relates to climate change, is entertaining

  16. #178 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Moved from common or garden cunt list to supremely nasty racist cunt list.
    I cut him off from FB.. he's become that much of a foul fellow

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (07-18-2019)

  18. #179 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,732 Times in 14,328 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Moved from common or garden cunt list to supremely nasty racist cunt list.
    Wait. You had different lists when you were wife shopping?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  19. #180 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leaningright View Post
    That didn’t take long.
    Of course not. It takes seconds to ferret out stupidity.

  20. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (07-19-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. 97 percent of scientists believe in man made climate change. FALSE!
    By Grugore in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-13-2018, 04:45 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-20-2018, 05:52 AM
  3. Scientists find way to "disarm" AIDS virus
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-19-2011, 11:33 PM
  4. APP - Surprisingly, the THIRD "Climate Gate" Review vindicates climate scientists
    By Cypress in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-14-2010, 10:55 AM
  5. Is it "global warming" now--or is it "climate change"?
    By theMAJORITY in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-01-2008, 07:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •