A circular definition... Meaningless.
Another meaningless term, as "climate change" is not defined...
Weather is not global. There is no such thing as 'global weather'.
There cannot be stations measuring something which doesn't exist.
There cannot be data for something which doesn't exist.
Non-existence does not yield patterns.
Climate is not global. There is no such thing as a 'global climate'.
Those 'fundamentals' are nonsense.
This applies to YOU, not 'deniers'...
Satellites are incapable of measuring an absolute temperature. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. You are ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law again, and even arguing a paradox.
1) infrared light is trapped by CO2 and does not reach space
2) infrared light is visible to satellites. It is not trapped by CO2 and does reach space.
Which is it, dude?
anonymoose (07-18-2019), Stretch (07-18-2019)
His basic argument is that these factors are not zero, which is true. It is known that these factors will cause nucleation in a Wilson cloud chamber. These factors are pretty minor, but they ARE there.
But the major factor in cloud formation on Earth is none of these. Clouds on Earth simply form from convective heat and a bit of available humidity in the air. Any kind of dust or even radiation from the Sun (which is a LOT stronger than that from cosmic rays!) will trigger the actual nucleation itself.
The reason we remember Wilson and his cloud chamber machine today is because Wilson accidentally created a machine that allowed us to see, for the first time, the nuclei of atoms being split, which means we can see what we're doing when we are trying to split the atom. Made atomic power and nuclear research much easier that way!
Warming Oceans
The oceans have absorbed much of this increased heat, with the top 700 meters (about 2,300 feet) of ocean showing warming of more than 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1969.
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
No shit ! NASA ? maggot ? I'm still thinking. Haw, haw......................haw.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
What study is it reporting on? It isn't published. It isn't peer reviewed. It is a piece of garbage they uploaded to a website.
For a scientific critique of the unpublished paper you claim is a "study" you can go here:
https://climatefeedback.org/claimrev...lobal-warming/
As to the rest of the garbage from Zerohedge, they pull quotes from unrelated articles and pretend they are from scientific papers they are not from.
The paper by the Kobe scientists can be found here:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45466-8
It doesn't support anything in the unpublished paper and says nothing about current climate change. The quote mining from the paper by zerohedge is specious at best, outright fraud by zerohedge seems to be more likely.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
domer76 (07-18-2019)
cancel2 2022 (07-18-2019)
cancel2 2022 (07-19-2019)
Bookmarks