Sailor (07-15-2019)
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Sailor (07-15-2019)
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Works for me. The federal government no authority to implement such a program in the first place.
Any lack of money for the Funding the 'Feed the Future' program does not prevent people from growing food.
What if YOU were that aborted child?
Now you justify murder.
Define 'climate change'. There is no such thing as a global climate.
Define 'climate change'.
Define 'climate change'.
Obviously, you are just cutting and pasting from propaganda sources.
Define 'climate change'.
Define 'climate migration'. Define 'climate change'.
Define 'climate migration.
Define 'climate action'.
Define 'global warming'. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
What advancing desertification?
What rising sea levels? It is not possible to measure the global sea level.
No one is monitoring the number of natural disasters in the world.
Scholars are not gods. Anyone blaming 'climate change' for 'climate migration' because 'climate action' has not been done is just making a void argument fallacy. You have to define these terms before they mean anything.
I'll be your Holy Entrails told you this, didn't they?
Define 'climate resilient'.
Defenses. There is no 'c'. Why is a project like this 'climate resilient'?
Flood control projects can be useful, yes.
The Chad government is often the cause of this violence, dumbass.
That's rather difficult with all the religious wars and clan wars in the region.
Define 'climate resilience'.
Examples of what? Define 'climate resilience'.
What government research? Why would anyone believe government Holy Entrails?
What displacement? From what?
What challenges?
Define 'climate migration'.
Ah..so you are cut and pasting from another propaganda site.
Guess what? Until you define 'climate change', 'climate action', and 'climate migration', you are just cut and pasting void argument fallacies from propaganda and religious sites.
Earl (07-19-2019)
Earl (07-19-2019)
Earl (07-19-2019)
“While Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and her friends in the media, are quintupling down on comparing American detention facilities to concentration camps, a survivor of the real concentration camps in Nazi Germany is livid, and speaking out.
Ed Mosberg is 93 years old, and is one of the few people still alive who survived the Nazi camps. He lives in Morris Plains, NJ, and he spoke to the New York Post about the freshman congresswoman's comments.
"She should be removed from Congress. She's spreading anti-Semitism, hatred and stupidity," he said to the paper. "The people on the border aren't forced to be there — they go there on their own will. If someone doesn't know the difference, either they're playing stupid or they just don't care."
It's not just about the intent or the status of the people at the border, but the offensiveness of the comparison itself. Mosberg's whole family was killed, murdered by the Nazis. He was the lone survivor, and made it out of two concentration camps, Plaszów and Mauthausen.”
theblaze.com
This is what a concentration camp is.
What information?
News polls??? That's your information???
What data?
What data?
What information?
Easy.
* Statistical mathematics is only capable of summarizing past or present data. It has no power of prediction due to its use of random numbers.
* Raw data MUST be available for any statistical summary.
* Raw data MUST be free of any biasing influences.
* Instruments, if used, MUST have their tolerances known and published, and their method of calibration and when must also be available.
* Only raw data may be used. Selection MUST be by randN.
* Normalization MUST be by paired randR. It is this procedure and only this procedure that eliminates out of band data.
* Variance MUST be declared and justified. For temperature, it is not uncommon to see temperature gradients as steep as 20 deg F per mile.
* The Margin of Error MUST be calculated and published as part of the summary. A simple average is utterly meaningless.
In other words, you are simply quoting people who deny mathematics. You deny mathematics yourself, and hence are unable to see their error. This is due to the fundamentalist nature of the Church of Global Warming. They deny mathematics and science. Specifically for science, they deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, just as you do.
You still need to define 'climate change'. No theory is possible (whether scientific or otherwise) based on a void argument fallacy.
Stretch (07-19-2019)
Bookmarks