Originally Posted by
Grumpy
I'm a gun owner and defender of the 2nd amendment. So please explain to me why bumpstocks that mimic fully automatic weapons are any different from fully automatic weapons that are illegal to own without a special license?
if you were a real defender of the 2nd Amendment, you would disagree that a special license is required to own a full automatic, thus your own premise and position is inherently flawed, making you sound like a fudd/butter
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks