accessories are not protected by the 2nd Amendment

[countryboy]

In the delusional minds of conservatives in support of trump, they've swallowed the NRA koolaid that bump stocks and supressors are not firearms protected by the 2nd Amendment. Falling right in to the trap of the deep state dictatorship, soon it will be high capacity magazines that we no longer need to exercise our right of self defense.

Attachment 10390

The only one delusional is you. Not sure where you get these crazy ideas, must be something in the water where you live.

[archives]

amazing how many liberals project their own inadequacies on so called gun huggers because they are too cowardly to fight a tyrannical government...........but that's your cross to bear, not mine.

Only "tyrannical government" I've ever seen was in the pages of Bircher literature and State militia's handouts, ain't losing any sleep over that one

[archives]

Only of some conservatives that support Trump.

I say all parts of any weapon, including optional parts are protected.

Which means they, along with the weapon itself, can be regulated constitutionally, no right is absolute

[SmarterthanYou]

The only one delusional is you. Not sure where you get these crazy ideas, must be something in the water where you live.

magadrityshoes.jpg

[SmarterthanYou]

Only "tyrannical government" I've ever seen was in the pages of Bircher literature and State militia's handouts, ain't losing any sleep over that one

like most slaves, or slavish mindsets, you never see tyrannical government. you feel free as long as you get to go to work to pay taxes, maybe get some free shit from that government......but you don't see tyrannical government because you want that government to force others to live the way you do............so no, i'm sure you don't see tyranny at all.........pretty shameful and pathetic

[Sirthinksalot]

Amazing how nearly all gun huggers think they are Chuck Norris when in reality Barney Fife is probably more accurate

Chuck Norris doesn't need a gun. And in his movies, he almost never uses one. You should come up with a better example.

[countryboy]

magadrityshoes.jpg

Ah, in typical lib fashion, all you have is a cartoon. How.....typical.

[Celticguy]

well, they are from illinois, so....................

SMH.....

[Into the Night]

Which means they, along with the weapon itself, can be regulated constitutionally, no right is absolute

You are denying the Constitution. Redefinition fallacy (void<->absolute, not be infringed<->infringe).

[Into the Night]

Chuck Norris doesn't need a gun. And in his movies, he almost never uses one. You should come up with a better example.

Funny how I've NEVER had an accidental discharge with any of my guns.

[Sirthinksalot]

Funny how I've NEVER had an accidental discharge with any of my guns.

The Barney Fife insult is just as dumb as the terms "barrel stroker" and "gun humper". Liberals don't have any good arguments, so they use lame insults.

[Into the Night]

The Barney Fife insult is just as dumb as the terms "barrel stroker" and "gun humper". Liberals don't have any good arguments, so they use lame insults.

I find their tactics usually take the form:

Insults. Most often lame ones.
Inversion fallacies (projecting themselves upon others they are making an argument to).
Redefinitions (many of them aren't even speaking English anymore).
Argument from randU fallacies (making up random numbers as 'data').
Arguments of the stone fallacies (just bullheading onward, despite anything you say).
Never answering a question put to them.
Bigotry.

All driven from that fundamentalist religious fervor that comes from the Church of Karl Marx.

[SmarterthanYou]

Ah, in typical lib fashion, all you have is a cartoon. How.....typical.

ROFL, in typical low information voter fashion, you think i'm a liberal because I used a cartoon............dismissing all the other posts i have on here where i've slammed liberals and democrats.

[SmarterthanYou]

Which means they, along with the weapon itself, can be regulated constitutionally, no right is absolute

this is the idiotic thinking that allows government to restrict or deny our rights, causes us to fight day in and day out for our rights, that gives the government more fuel to control and hold power over us. how can you call yourself an american?

[Poor Richard Saunders]

given what little you might know about human nature and american attitudes, do you really think that the other 100 million gun owners are going to see the ATF or local PD drone my house or blow it up with a robot because I won't surrender high capacity magazines and not respond even more violently? that the entity of government responsible won't have any political fallout over killing an american citizen who wouldn't surrender property?

Do you really think 100 million other people are going to care about and support you when you threatened LEO and they responded as if your threat was real? I doubt most of them will even hear about, let alone care about it. Which side do you think gun owners who are military and law enforcement will support, the law enforcement personnel putting their lives on the line or the idiot that feels he can threaten LEO without consequences? Will there be the usual militia idiots showing up to pretend they can do something and then they don't do anything but wave their guns and then go home? Maybe, but probably not since they only show up long after the courts have ruled against them.