Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Sink The Garbage

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Sink The Garbage



    Stop talking about the manmade climate change hoax because nothing can be done about it. Mother Nature —— not the Parasite Class —— controls the climate:

    G20 host Japan hopes world leaders will endorse a deal on marine plastic waste and find common ground on climate change, but its own environmental record is under increasing scrutiny.

    Activists say Japan has fallen behind on reducing plastic consumption and is caving to US pressure to water down language on climate change to achieve a unanimous statement on the issue.

    Japan welcomes G20 leaders for summit centred on climate change
    Date created : 27/06/2019 - 06:30Latest update : 27/06/2019 - 06:46
    Text by: NEWS WIRES

    https://www.france24.com/en/20190627...-plastic-waste

    Something can be done about manmade plastic. Simply recycle plastic and use it to build huge barges, Fill the barges with garbage and sink them in deep water at least fifty miles offshore.

    The hull would have to be made of 2 inch thick plastic. An inner container would have 1/8th inch holes all over its sides and bottom. A hatch cover that can be firmly be installed would also have 1/8th inch holes so the the air can escape as the barge sinks. Presto. Two problems are solved. Getting rid of garbage along with finding a use for unwanted plastic.

    Any competent engineer could design those barges in his spare time.

    Confining large quantities of garbage in minute areas on the ocean’s sea bottom does no harm. Mainly, only the tiniest of creatures can get at the garbage in the barges. Hell, the holes can even be reduced to pin holes.

    Cleaning up the oceans has long been the dream of marine tax dollar parasites. The hucksters are conning the troops with “Save the Oceans” crapola. In truth, they are really after getting paid for their opinion of beauty:


    aesthetic or esthetic (adjective)

    1. concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty. "the pictures give great aesthetic pleasure" giving or designed to give pleasure through beauty; of pleasing appearance.

    synonyms: decorative, ornamental, graceful, elegant, exquisite, beautiful, attractive, pleasing, lovely, stylish, artistic, tasteful, in good taste

    esthetic (noun)

    1.a set of principles underlying and guiding the work of a particular artist or artistic movement. "the Cubist aesthetic"

    Finally, add up all of the miles in every shoreline, harbor, and river. Then identify all of the areas containing plastic, cans, glass, etc. The comparison will show that so-called polluted areas are infinitesimal, but they are enough to give thousands of environmental parasites tax dollar incomes.

    The joke is that oceans are salinating faster than all of the plastic, cans, and bottles can pollute. Salinization can be bigger than solar and wind energy scams. After the parasites make billions collecting all of the underwater manmade materials they will demand tax dollars to desalinate the oceans, and just for good measure they will install giant ice makers to save the penguins.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...08#post2926308
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Philippines trash war: 69 containers of ‘unique material’ arrive back in Canada (VIDEOS)
    Published time: 29 Jun, 2019 23:24 Edited time: 30 Jun, 2019 05:31

    https://www.rt.com/news/463030-canada-trash-returns-philippines/




    VICTOR HUGO

    "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time as come."


    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Something can be done about manmade plastic. Simply recycle plastic and use it to build huge barges, Fill the barges with garbage and sink them in deep water at least fifty miles offshore.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Finally, add up all of the miles in every shoreline, harbor, and river. Then identify all of the areas containing plastic, cans, glass, etc. The comparison will show that so-called polluted areas are infinitesimal, but they are enough to give thousands of environmental parasites tax dollar incomes.
    Jeez, wackos have been predicting doom for decades.




    AOC was the undisputed champ of the crazies:




    Agent 006 & 7/8ths reports that AOC is being challenged:


    Meanwhile the stench of dead fish is coming from the United Nations, where activist posers Ghislaine Maxwell and Scott Borgerson used the cause of ‘Saving the Environment’ to save themselves from being caught up in the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal.

    ‘Save the Fish!’ Accused Epstein Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bogus U. N. Sideline
    By Judi McLeod
    July 16, 2020

    https://canadafreepress.com/article/...u.-n.-sideline
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-16-2020), Matt Dillon (07-17-2020)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Jeez, wackos have been predicting doom for decades.




    AOC was the undisputed champ of the crazies:




    Agent 006 & 7/8ths reports that AOC is being challenged:


    Meanwhile the stench of dead fish is coming from the United Nations, where activist posers Ghislaine Maxwell and Scott Borgerson used the cause of ‘Saving the Environment’ to save themselves from being caught up in the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal.

    ‘Save the Fish!’ Accused Epstein Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bogus U. N. Sideline
    By Judi McLeod
    July 16, 2020

    https://canadafreepress.com/article/...u.-n.-sideline
    ANOTHER fine post, Flanders. Thank you.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post


    Stop talking about the manmade climate change hoax because nothing can be done about it. Mother Nature —— not the Parasite Class —— controls the climate:

    G20 host Japan hopes world leaders will endorse a deal on marine plastic waste and find common ground on climate change, but its own environmental record is under increasing scrutiny.

    Activists say Japan has fallen behind on reducing plastic consumption and is caving to US pressure to water down language on climate change to achieve a unanimous statement on the issue.

    Japan welcomes G20 leaders for summit centred on climate change
    Date created : 27/06/2019 - 06:30Latest update : 27/06/2019 - 06:46
    Text by: NEWS WIRES

    https://www.france24.com/en/20190627...-plastic-waste

    Something can be done about manmade plastic. Simply recycle plastic and use it to build huge barges, Fill the barges with garbage and sink them in deep water at least fifty miles offshore.

    The hull would have to be made of 2 inch thick plastic. An inner container would have 1/8th inch holes all over its sides and bottom. A hatch cover that can be firmly be installed would also have 1/8th inch holes so the the air can escape as the barge sinks. Presto. Two problems are solved. Getting rid of garbage along with finding a use for unwanted plastic.

    Any competent engineer could design those barges in his spare time.

    Confining large quantities of garbage in minute areas on the ocean’s sea bottom does no harm. Mainly, only the tiniest of creatures can get at the garbage in the barges. Hell, the holes can even be reduced to pin holes.

    Cleaning up the oceans has long been the dream of marine tax dollar parasites. The hucksters are conning the troops with “Save the Oceans” crapola. In truth, they are really after getting paid for their opinion of beauty:


    aesthetic or esthetic (adjective)

    1. concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty. "the pictures give great aesthetic pleasure" giving or designed to give pleasure through beauty; of pleasing appearance.

    synonyms: decorative, ornamental, graceful, elegant, exquisite, beautiful, attractive, pleasing, lovely, stylish, artistic, tasteful, in good taste

    esthetic (noun)

    1.a set of principles underlying and guiding the work of a particular artist or artistic movement. "the Cubist aesthetic"

    Finally, add up all of the miles in every shoreline, harbor, and river. Then identify all of the areas containing plastic, cans, glass, etc. The comparison will show that so-called polluted areas are infinitesimal, but they are enough to give thousands of environmental parasites tax dollar incomes.

    The joke is that oceans are salinating faster than all of the plastic, cans, and bottles can pollute. Salinization can be bigger than solar and wind energy scams. After the parasites make billions collecting all of the underwater manmade materials they will demand tax dollars to desalinate the oceans, and just for good measure they will install giant ice makers to save the penguins.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...08#post2926308
    Great thread idea, Flanders. Nicely done.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.2 For This Post:

    Flanders (07-16-2020)

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 71 Times in 70 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default This is a paper bag.

    799420.jpg

    1986
    Recycling began in New York City as a voluntary program in 1986. In July 1989,
    with the passage of Local Law 19, recycling became mandatory. Collection of
    required materials was phased in, district by district.

    1959
    Plastic bags were invented to save the planet, according to the son of Swedish
    engineer Sten Gustaf Thulin who created them in 1959. The bags were developed
    as an alternative to paper bags, which were considered bad for the environment
    because they resulted in forests being chopped down.

    Bag Waste Reduction Law: Information for Manufacturers and Retailers - Frequently
    asked questions about the Plastic Bag Ban (Article 27, Title 28 New York State Bag
    Waste Reduction Act). The law takes effect March 1, 2020 and prohibits the distribution
    of plastic carryout bags by certain retailers in New York state.

    1965 I never paid for TV UNTIL THE 90'S
    Manhattan has had cable television service since 1965, when it was introduced as an
    experiment to get around television interference caused by tall buildings. Cable service
    was delayed in the other boroughs by a combination of litigation, lack of interest by
    the cable industry and financing problems.

    What happens if you don't pay your water bill NYC?
    All overdue water and sewer charges are considered a lien against your property.
    Under new legislation passed January 27, 2017, the City has the authority to sell
    this lien to a third party, or lienholder, in a process called a lien sale.


  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 71 Times in 70 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ParachuteAdams View Post
    1965 I never paid for TV UNTIL THE 90'S
    Manhattan has had cable television service since 1965, when it was introduced as an
    experiment to get around television interference caused by tall buildings. Cable service
    was delayed in the other boroughs by a combination of litigation, lack of interest by
    the cable industry and financing problems.
    To ParachuteAdams: Thank you for citing garbage in a thread about garbage.

    The Golden Age of Television is not a reference to programming. It refers to that time before the remote control device was invented. Back then the viewers watched, and listened to, the commercials the way God intended they should. The government still got its message out in program content and brief news broadcasts. It was a perfect world for one and all until the remote control became part of the furniture in every household with a TV.

    Next came the VCR.

    The Ministry of Propaganda (FCC) was losing ground and something had to be done; hence, the Fairness Doctrine stopped the bleeding until President Reagan abolished it 1986. That was followed by the Internet.

    The government fought back when analogue was replaced with digital transmission. The result was creating hundreds of advertising platforms akin to a newspaper adding a hundred pages of advertising for every paragraph of news. I say paragraph because that is all you will find in the NY Times, the WaPo et al.

    In short: The airwaves belong to the advertising industry. The cat was out of the bag when the government all but did away with analog television transmissions. Americans who supposedly “owned” the airwaves did not get a vote when hundreds of new advertising platforms were created by digital transmissions.

    The worst part was that digital increased the number of parasites taking down huge tax dollar salaries on cable networks. Those salaries are paid by the advertising tax deduction which is passed onto every American whether or not they own a TV.

    Having said the above I never expected to see this happen in my lifetime:


    For the first time satellite and cable TV providers lost more than a million subscribers from July through September this year. To be exact, they lost 1.1 million customers. Which is a lot of monthly fees gone poof!

    Worst quarter ever for cable/Satellite TV providers
    Andrew Malcolm
    Posted at 10:01 am on November 20, 2018

    https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/...cable-cutting/

    I cannot swear the way President Trump dealt with Jim Acosta was a contributing factor. Cancelling subscriptions was in the hopper long before Trump slapped Acosta upside the head.

    Regardless of the reason cable is losing subscribers, and dollars, I like to think Americans are slowly —— very slowly —— coming to the truth about what television did this country. (The Parasite Class will always be TV’s biggest supporters.)



    A heavenly chorus is in rehearsal for the day the advertising tax deduction is eliminated.


    According to Disney’s recently released annual report, sports network ESPN has lost 2 million domestic subscribers over the course of 2018.

    Disney’s report revealed that the company’s sports network, ESPN, currently has 86 million subscribers. This is down two million from the 88 million subscribers to the sports commentary and news station in 2017.

    ESPN wasn’t the only Disney-owned network to lose subscribers this year: The Disney Channel went from 92 million subscribers in 2017 to 89 million subscribers in 2018, while Freeform fell by two million subscribers to 90 million, and Disney Junior and Disney XD both lost approximately three million subscribers.

    ESPN Loses 2 Million Subscribers This Year
    by LUCAS NOLAN
    22 Nov 2018

    https://www.breitbart.com/entertainm...ers-this-year/

    The beauty in TV’s shrinking audience is that TV programming is not the automobile industry coming out with new models and colors every year. TV is stuck with the same shit it was spewing all over the country from day one. Nor does TV have a secondary industry like used cars, nor does TV programs have a lucrative repair industry. TV does have reruns, but that is the same shit broadcasted ad infinitum.

    Best of all, when economic reality kicks a number of parasites have to hit the bricks with every reduction in the number of subscribers. So far, the projected number is miniscule, but the day must come when the dam breaks flooding the country with unemployable parasites.

    NOTE: Ninety percent of Third World households do not own a television. That is the last untapped market television parasites have after TV tanks in First World countries.

    The only way to rein in offensive words and pictures on television is to eliminate the tax deduction for advertising. That is not going to happen in the near future because product and service advertising pays for every minute of political propaganda filth.

    I doubt if there is a way to eliminate tax dollar political propaganda without triggering the anger of product and service advertisers. As far as I am concerned to hell with them. They always knew that their tax deductions paid for every bit of the garbage television spewed on this country from the beginning. So I repeat: To hell with them.

    No one (except me) is calling for the elimination of political propaganda. Indeed, television news is out-and-out political propaganda, while the content in entertainment shows is drowning in liberalism.

    Advertising on the Internet is also a tax deduction. On the plus side, the government and TV propagandists have been burning the midnight oil for at least two decades trying to come up with a way to censor free speech on the Internet without damaging television’s revenues.

    On the plus side, eliminating tax deductible advertising in order to cure Internet television’s disease the industry will die the death of a thousand cuts while freedom of speech on the Internet grows stronger.

    Parenthetically, motion picture industry tax subsides are kissin’ cousins of tax dollar funded political advertising, while subsidies deserve a thread of their own. Note that f–king & sucking (hardcore pornography) are the only movies that do not need government subsidies for survival.

    See number 3 permalink in this thread for a bit more:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...32#post2883032
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-20-2020)

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 71 Times in 70 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Report a leak.

    That's when they decided to put a meter on the water.
    There was a bad one in the 80's. If you tried to sell me
    a bottle of water in the 80's. I thought you were crazy.

    In the 1970s, just 350 million gallons of bottled water were
    being sold in the United States—about a gallon and a half
    per person per year. Much of that came in the big five-gallon
    jugs used in office water coolers; the rest made up a niche
    market of mineral waters bottled from natural springs.

    Drought in New York

    The U.S. Drought Monitor started in 2000. Since 2000,
    the longest duration of drought (D1-D4) in New York
    lasted 47 weeks beginning on July 24, 2001 and ending
    on June 11, 2002. The most intense period of drought
    occurred the week of September 6, 2016 where D3
    affected 9.94% of New York land.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To ParachuteAdams: Thank you for citing garbage in a thread about garbage.

    The Golden Age of Television is not a reference to programming. It refers to that time before the remote control device was invented. Back then the viewers watched, and listened to, the commercials the way God intended they should. The government still got its message out in program content and brief news broadcasts. It was a perfect world for one and all until the remote control became part of the furniture in every household with a TV.

    Next came the VCR.

    The Ministry of Propaganda (FCC) was losing ground and something had to be done; hence, the Fairness Doctrine stopped the bleeding until President Reagan abolished it 1986. That was followed by the Internet.

    The government fought back when analogue was replaced with digital transmission. The result was creating hundreds of advertising platforms akin to a newspaper adding a hundred pages of advertising for every paragraph of news. I say paragraph because that is all you will find in the NY Times, the WaPo et al.

    In short: The airwaves belong to the advertising industry. The cat was out of the bag when the government all but did away with analog television transmissions. Americans who supposedly “owned” the airwaves did not get a vote when hundreds of new advertising platforms were created by digital transmissions.

    The worst part was that digital increased the number of parasites taking down huge tax dollar salaries on cable networks. Those salaries are paid by the advertising tax deduction which is passed onto every American whether or not they own a TV.

    Having said the above I never expected to see this happen in my lifetime:


    For the first time satellite and cable TV providers lost more than a million subscribers from July through September this year. To be exact, they lost 1.1 million customers. Which is a lot of monthly fees gone poof!

    Worst quarter ever for cable/Satellite TV providers
    Andrew Malcolm
    Posted at 10:01 am on November 20, 2018

    https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/...cable-cutting/

    I cannot swear the way President Trump dealt with Jim Acosta was a contributing factor. Cancelling subscriptions was in the hopper long before Trump slapped Acosta upside the head.

    Regardless of the reason cable is losing subscribers, and dollars, I like to think Americans are slowly —— very slowly —— coming to the truth about what television did this country. (The Parasite Class will always be TV’s biggest supporters.)



    A heavenly chorus is in rehearsal for the day the advertising tax deduction is eliminated.


    According to Disney’s recently released annual report, sports network ESPN has lost 2 million domestic subscribers over the course of 2018.

    Disney’s report revealed that the company’s sports network, ESPN, currently has 86 million subscribers. This is down two million from the 88 million subscribers to the sports commentary and news station in 2017.

    ESPN wasn’t the only Disney-owned network to lose subscribers this year: The Disney Channel went from 92 million subscribers in 2017 to 89 million subscribers in 2018, while Freeform fell by two million subscribers to 90 million, and Disney Junior and Disney XD both lost approximately three million subscribers.

    ESPN Loses 2 Million Subscribers This Year
    by LUCAS NOLAN
    22 Nov 2018

    https://www.breitbart.com/entertainm...ers-this-year/

    The beauty in TV’s shrinking audience is that TV programming is not the automobile industry coming out with new models and colors every year. TV is stuck with the same shit it was spewing all over the country from day one. Nor does TV have a secondary industry like used cars, nor does TV programs have a lucrative repair industry. TV does have reruns, but that is the same shit broadcasted ad infinitum.

    Best of all, when economic reality kicks a number of parasites have to hit the bricks with every reduction in the number of subscribers. So far, the projected number is miniscule, but the day must come when the dam breaks flooding the country with unemployable parasites.

    NOTE: Ninety percent of Third World households do not own a television. That is the last untapped market television parasites have after TV tanks in First World countries.

    The only way to rein in offensive words and pictures on television is to eliminate the tax deduction for advertising. That is not going to happen in the near future because product and service advertising pays for every minute of political propaganda filth.

    I doubt if there is a way to eliminate tax dollar political propaganda without triggering the anger of product and service advertisers. As far as I am concerned to hell with them. They always knew that their tax deductions paid for every bit of the garbage television spewed on this country from the beginning. So I repeat: To hell with them.

    No one (except me) is calling for the elimination of political propaganda. Indeed, television news is out-and-out political propaganda, while the content in entertainment shows is drowning in liberalism.

    Advertising on the Internet is also a tax deduction. On the plus side, the government and TV propagandists have been burning the midnight oil for at least two decades trying to come up with a way to censor free speech on the Internet without damaging television’s revenues.

    On the plus side, eliminating tax deductible advertising in order to cure Internet television’s disease the industry will die the death of a thousand cuts while freedom of speech on the Internet grows stronger.

    Parenthetically, motion picture industry tax subsides are kissin’ cousins of tax dollar funded political advertising, while subsidies deserve a thread of their own. Note that f–king & sucking (hardcore pornography) are the only movies that do not need government subsidies for survival.

    See number 3 permalink in this thread for a bit more:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...32#post2883032
    Another fine post, Flanders. Thank you.

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    GARBAGE UPDATE

    John Nolte’s article is well-intentioned, but television programs was always government propaganda where the worst people in society gorged themselves on tax deducible advertising dollars.

    Nolte knocking today’s so-called entertainment programing misses the point —— entertainment television was always big government garbage just as destructive as news programs are —— worse in many cases because more people watch entertainment shows than they watch the news.

    Mr. Nolte calling 1999 – 2009 the golden era of TV is not only inexcusable it is dead wrong:


    And the thing is, as I rewatch the shows birthed during that legitimate Golden Era of TV (1999 – 2009), one thing that always flies through my mind is how different they would be if produced today.


    Nolte: How Woke Killed the Golden Age of Television
    by John Nolte
    11 Jan 2021

    https://www.breitbart.com/social-jus...of-television/


    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    The Golden Age of Television is not a reference to programming. It refers to that time before the remote control device was invented. Back then the viewers watched, and listened to, the commercials the way God intended they should. The government still got its message out in program content and brief news broadcasts. It was a perfect world for one and all until the remote control became part of the furniture in every household with a TV.

    Next came the VCR.

    The Ministry of Propaganda (FCC) was losing ground and something had to be done; hence, the Fairness Doctrine stopped the bleeding until President Reagan abolished it 1986. That was followed by the Internet.
    NOTE: Writers write dirty little Passion plays, and actors recite the dialogue. Irrespective of the religion, it was the same in Nazi Germany, in the Soviet Union, in today’s China, in North Korea, etc. They do it for the money.

    Their paymasters do it to save souls, or save the world, whichever gives them the most control. They are clerics of every stripe—— clergyperson, clerical, clerk, deacon, divine, dominie, ecclesiastic, minister, preacher, priest, reverend churchman, clergyman, father, Holy Joe [slang], padre clergywoman, deaconess, priestess abbot, archbishop, archpriest, bishop, dean, diocesan, monsignor, pope, prelate, presbyter abbé, curate, curé, parson, pastor, rector, shepherd, vicar chaplain, confessor, sky pilot evangelist, missionary, missioner, missionizer, revivalist friar, mendicant, monastic, monk, oblate, religious high priest, high priestess.

    p.s. Analyzing the garbage is the only reason an adult should watch television.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. Democrats Sink Even Lower
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-16-2018, 09:47 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2017, 11:59 AM
  3. Climate Depot- garbage in garbage out
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-22-2017, 07:51 PM
  4. Democrats/Obama sink to a new low
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-15-2016, 06:22 AM
  5. Greece: Why not let it sink?
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-10-2012, 06:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •