Project Veritas Exposes Google Censorship

[Darth Omar]

_________________

Google bias is a matter of public record.

[MAGA MAN]

Stupid! All this talk about Hillary's EMAILS is all bullshit! Has always been bullshit! SUCKER! LOL!

You're afraid to enter the search term in Google: "Hillary Clinton emails", because you know that I am right. It shouldn't matter if it was 100% manufactured bullshit or not. That is not for a search engine to decide- it is for individuals to decide.

[MAGA MAN]

_________________

Google bias is a matter of public record.

Same gal that is in the Veritas video. I can clearly see the seething contempt that she has for Cruz.

[Darth Omar]

Google needs to be shut down. All these big tech companies need to be shut down or broken up.

“But it will be harder for smaller companies to stop the next Trump situation”.

Talk about letting the cat out of the bag.

[MAGA MAN]

“But it will be harder for smaller companies to stop the next Trump situation”.

Talk about letting the cat out of the bag.

She's a completely different person off camera.

[Flash]

Dude, you are not allowed to run through the theater screaming "Fire" when there is no fire. That is against the law!

And you are no longer going to be able to run through the internet screaming irresponsible and reckless lies either- like you assholes and your Russian Backers did in 2016.

I bet that does have you bastards sharting your britches? Don't it? BLAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

What? Did your little playhouse get tore down? BLAHAHAHAHAHA!

Falsely yelling fire can create mass hysteria and possible harm (but is probably not illegal unless it results in harm). Yelling falsehoods on the internet is free speech and does not cause human harm.

[Flash]

Google needs to be shut down. All these big tech companies need to be shut down or broken up.

Who do you want to do this---the government?

[Sailor]

Who do you want to do this---the government?

I truly do not know. Just voicing my frustration. This is way out of hand.

[Adolf_Twitler]

Falsely yelling fire can create mass hysteria and possible harm (but is probably not illegal unless it results in harm). Yelling falsehoods on the internet is free speech and does not cause human harm.

It does cause harm. Look at those two idiot TRUMP SUPPORTERS that tried to kill all the Democrat leaders. It's the same crap you idiots post here that makes those idiots go bat-shit-crazy and start shooting and killing innocent people.

Your rhetoric is dangerous because other stupid TRUMP SUPPORTERS get their panties in a wad and go out and kill people- because of your lies!

[Flash]

I truly do not know. Just voicing my frustration. This is way out of hand.

Just choose not to use those services and products you dislike. Think AOL.

[Sailor]

Just choose not to use those services and products you dislike. Think AOL.

I agree, thanks. Even with that though they are just to powerful with information dissemination. It has always been that way, who controls the print or media controls the narrative. Information has become so readily available and part of our daily lives though through somewhat limited conglomerates. That would not be bad thing if they were truly unbiased. As this thread shows, some are not. They want to control the narrative.

[Flash]

It does cause harm. Look at those two idiot TRUMP SUPPORTERS that tried to kill all the Democrat leaders. It's the same crap you idiots post here that makes those idiots go bat-shit-crazy and start shooting and killing innocent people.

Your rhetoric is dangerous because other stupid TRUMP SUPPORTERS get their panties in a wad and go out and kill people- because of your lies!

Fortunately free speech protects us against those who want to restrict that they disagree with. Look at the guy who shot up the baseball practice. What post caused his actions?

It is a big jump with no evidence to suggest free speech causes anybody to commit crimes. Look at all the bombings and violence by leftist groups in the 1960s-70's. There was no internet to post lies, so who caused their actions?

If you want to blame violence for anything I've ever posted you really are whacko.

I'm sad to see the dangerous fascist tendencies from both right and left who want to restrict our civil liberties because they think rhetoric is causing harm. It is about at the same level of those who think open homosexuality turns little kids into homosexuals.

[Adolf_Twitler]

Fortunately free speech protects us against those who want to restrict that they disagree with. Look at the guy who shot up the baseball practice. What post caused his actions?

It is a big jump with no evidence to suggest free speech causes anybody to commit crimes. Look at all the bombings and violence by leftist groups in the 1960s-70's. There was no internet to post lies, so who caused their actions?

If you want to blame violence for anything I've ever posted you really are whacko.

I'm sad to see the dangerous fascist tendencies from both right and left who want to restrict our civil liberties because they think rhetoric is causing harm. It is about at the same level of those who think open homosexuality turns little kids into homosexuals.

Dude! Let me help you out a little bit. Do you realize that 40 million dumb Republicans believe this shit?

[Flash]

Dude! Let me help you out a little bit. Do you realize that 40 million dumb Republicans believe this shit?

Now you want to restrict free press, also? Which crimes were Republicans motivated to commit because of the news about Hillary's alien baby? Gossip rags have been around for many years and you think they just now are causing violence?

Could you provide a link for that 40 million claim?

What is your solution? A truth police to prohibit anything from being written which cannot be proven and might cause violence? Submit your posts to JPP and it might appear in seven years.

You are much too gullible to think people go around committing violence because of internet posts.

[countryboy]

Google needs to be shut down. All these big tech companies need to be shut down or broken up.

Libs wanted to try and paint a $100,000 NDA payment as an "in kind campaign donation". How much of an in kind donation is Google giving Dems with this bullshit?