19,792

[archives]

Is Michelle running for office? Yes or no? If not, why do you stupidly think it is relevant?

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important

[Truth Detector]

oh wow!

more than at his inauguration!

LIE and LAME. What is with you liberal asshats and your propensity to lie and make shit up?

An estimated 300,000 to 600,000[1][2] people attended the public ceremony held on Friday, January 20, 2017

[Truth Detector]

he might even get 20K some day!!

Talking to yourself again?

[Sailor]

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important

That is why she and Obama are now the 1%'rs they got you all to run against. Those evil 1%'rs. They saw you all for what you are. Suckers.

[Truth Detector]

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important

Are you willfully this big of a moron; or do you work at it? We are talking Presidential campaign rally's shit-for-brains. Not book events by someone who is NOT running. Apples and apples; focus dumbass. Can the Clowns on the Democratic side of the aisle draw crowds this large? It's a simple yes or no based on the FACTS asshole.

[reagansghost]

LIE and LAME. What is with you liberal asshats and your propensity to lie and make shit up?

An estimated 300,000 to 600,000[1][2] people attended the public ceremony held on Friday, January 20, 2017

it is true Trump paid inauguration goers like he did for his 2015 escalator ride with Melanie?

[Stretch]

That is why she and Obama are now the 1%'rs they got you all to run against. Those evil 1%'rs. They saw you all for what you are. Suckers.

BOOM!

[Stretch]

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important

Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
Why, it was free

Michelle Obama's book tour events matched or in some cases outdrew Trump's rally crowd,

"Sure, and one you are sure to enjoy, didn't want to be accused of promoting "fake" news".............. per archives
you lose.....fake news!

[archives]

That is why she and Obama are now the 1%'rs they got you all to run against. Those evil 1%'rs. They saw you all for what you are. Suckers.

Now that was a quick change of the goal posts

[archives]

Are you willfully this big of a moron; or do you work at it? We are talking Presidential campaign rally's shit-for-brains. Not book events by someone who is NOT running. Apples and apples; focus dumbass. Can the Clowns on the Democratic side of the aisle draw crowds this large? It's a simple yes or no based on the FACTS asshole.

Right, well if it was such a momentous event then why was it match or perhaps even bettered by an event that people had to actually pay to attend to see someone who is "NOT running"

[anatta]

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important

cite please

[archives]

Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
Why, it was free

Michelle Obama's book tour events matched or in some cases outdrew Trump's rally crowd,

"Sure, and one you are sure to enjoy, didn't want to be accused of promoting "fake" news".............. per archives
you lose.....fake news!

Ah, let me help you out there "stretch," the "fake" news was in reference to the source you asked for, the proof, and I gave you Murdoch's flagship, even you couldn't accuse it of "fake" in noting the size of Michelle's crowds

And the rest of your post is nonsensical

[anonymoose]

Right, well if it was such a momentous event then why was it match or perhaps even bettered by an event that people had to actually pay to attend to see someone who is "NOT running"

Do you believe her "rallies" will continue into the next yr.?

[archives]

cite please

Go back, done it twice already, can't keep updating Trumpkins as they jump in

[reagansghost]

why was the crowd so small?