140 'IMPEACH TRUMP!' rallies underway across the nation

[domer76]

Ya ... tell that to Clinton !

Was Bill Clinton indicted? Cite it.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

The war addicts in the State Department and Military Industrial Complex are getting restless under Trump.

Biden would be an absolute pushover for them. Something to think about in 2020 if staying out of stupid wars is a big issue with you.

No, I don't want to have war. I very strongly do not want that. And I have to tell you I had grave concerns about Hillary's aspirations in that respect. But I felt that Trump and his unpredictability, coupled with his impetuousness, is a greater risk. I do not believe Biden has any stomach for it. And I hope he would rid the administration of any warmongers.

Bolton is a flaming warmonger. I have a strong fear that Trump will get desperate and decide a war would be a wonderful distraction from investigations.

Fortunately so far, anyway, his mouth is a big enough media distraction and he has not had to resort to that GWB trick.

I do recall the media had just begun to focus on corporate malfeasance just before GWB went there. I always wondered if that was part of the timing in the lead-up propaganda campaign GWB launched to take us to war with Iraq.

[Mason Michaels]

Mussolini 's fate would be a good last act for the Orange Asshole!

[Darth Omar]

Hello Darth,



No, I don't want to have war. I very strongly do not want that. And I have to tell you I had grave concerns about Hillary's aspirations in that respect. But I felt that Trump and his unpredictability, coupled with his impetuousness, is a greater risk. I do not believe Biden has any stomach for it. And I hope he would rid the administration of any warmongers.

Bolton is a flaming warmonger. I have a strong fear that Trump will get desperate and decide a war would be a wonderful distraction from investigations.

Fortunately so far, anyway, his mouth is a big enough media distraction and he has not had to resort to that GWB trick.

I do recall the media had just begun to focus on corporate malfeasance just before GWB went there. I always wondered if that was part of the timing in the lead-up propaganda campaign GWB launched to take us to war with Iraq.

You should at least begin to entertain the notion you’ve been wrong about Trump lol. At least in regard to warmongering.

Trump has consistently advocated against ‘stupid wars’—it was one of the reasons I voted for him. ‘Not getting into’ stupid wars may be the most important issue this country faces. One would think, that would be the one issue that would unite both Right and Left.

Sadly, so many on the left are blinded by rage.

Think about what has happened over the past four years: in the run up to the election Trump was cast as a crazed maniac that would have us in a war within a month of his inauguration. But what has happened? Nothing lol. In fact, it can be now be legitimately argued that Trump is the anti war president.

At least he’s anti war with respect to both of his immediate predecessors. How ironic is that?

I share in your apprehensions with Bolton. But Bolton is there to give Trump’s diplomacy some gravitas. If one wants to walk alone at night in a rough area, they take their Pit Bull with them. As long as Trump keeps Bolton on a short leash I’m ok with it.

The problem with Obama wasn’t that he was a warmonger—it’s that he was too weak to stand up to the war addicts that infest our government. We never should have touched Libya with a ten foot pole but we did and it’s now a terrorist Hell Hole where black Africans are sold into slave trade. What a tragedy. Trump may have his warts, but weakness isn’t one of them. Biden is an empty shell and he would be a pushover.

The only democrat candidate that has any sense in that regard is Tulsi Gabbard. She talks a lot about what she terms the ‘eternal war addicts’ and Gabbard knows that any president who gets elected has to confront them and keep them in check. Sadly, she may not even make the first round of democrat debates.

If you are truly anti war you should at least consider voting for Trump. Or at least back him vs the eternal war addicts. Because they are a much bigger threat to this country than Putin’s Russia ever thought about being.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

You should at least begin to entertain the notion you’ve been wrong about Trump lol. At least in regard to warmongering.

So far, anyway. And I have no problem with being wrong about that.

Trump has consistently advocated against ‘stupid wars’—it was one of the reasons I voted for him. ‘Not getting into’ stupid wars may be the most important issue this country faces. One would think, that would be the one issue that would unite both Right and Left.

Sadly, so many on the left are blinded by rage.

Think about what has happened over the past four years: in the run up to the election Trump was cast as a crazed maniac that would have us in a war within a month of his inauguration. But what has happened? Nothing lol. In fact, it can be now be legitimately argued that Trump is the anti war president.

At least he’s anti war with respect to both of his immediate predecessors. How ironic is that?

I share in your apprehensions with Bolton. But Bolton is there to give Trump’s diplomacy some gravitas. If one wants to walk alone at night in a rough area, they take their Pit Bull with them. As long as Trump keeps Bolton on a short leash I’m ok with it.

The problem with Obama wasn’t that he was a warmonger—it’s that he was too weak to stand up to the war addicts that infest our government. We never should have touched Libya with a ten foot pole but we did and it’s now a terrorist Hell Hole where black Africans are sold into slave trade. What a tragedy. Trump may have his warts, but weakness isn’t one of them. Biden is an empty shell and he would be a pushover.

The only democrat candidate that has any sense in that regard is Tulsi Gabbard. She talks a lot about what she terms the ‘eternal war addicts’ and Gabbard knows that any president who gets elected has to confront them and keep them in check. Sadly, she may not even make the first round of democrat debates.

If you are truly anti war you should at least consider voting for Trump. Or at least back him vs the eternal war addicts. Because they are a much bigger threat to this country than Putin’s Russia ever thought about being.

Maybe I misjudged Gabbard. I got the impression she was a little too pro-military for my taste.

I am totally against war. That's one of the things which drew me to Marianne Williamson. She wants to establish a Department Of Peace.

No way I would vote for Trump. Not happening. I have sworn to vote for any Dem nominee over Trump. I shall favor whomever I really want until the DNC, but after that I am all for whomever has the best chance to unseat Trump. He is that bad.

Just one scandal after another with him. So many that the public is blinded to it, has built up a tolerance to it.

That's the problem with the Republican party. They have built up a tolerance to Trump, even though many Republicans really know in their hearts that he is bad juju. They just come up with all kinds of ways to justify supporting him. Don't do it. He is a crook.

[reagansghost]

A 'livid' Trump fires three of his campaign pollsters after leak of unflattering poll numbers


Privately, the president was livid that the numbers leaked out, according to White House and campaign officials.

“He is madder that the numbers are out than that the numbers exist,” said one senior administration official, who like the others spoke on the condition of anonymity.

too funny!

[Grokmaster]

LOOK AT ALL THE PEOPE AT THE SOROS-FUNDED EVENTS!!! WHAT A TURNOUT!!!

[Ralph]

hmmm, wonder if TrumpTV is covering the story lol

get ready teabillies, we're coming for your Dear Leader comrade Trump

Oh my.....what are we going to do with these 10s of people? Reality: Even through it was promoted by the media......no one has shown up, its like the crowds for Biden events, the media outnumber the people. LMAO

[reagansghost]

Oh my.....what are we going to do with these 10s of people? Reality: Even through it was promoted by the media......no one has shown up, its like the crowds for Biden events, the media outnumber the people. LMAO

more people than attended Donny's inaugural lol

[Getin the ring]

Liberals making fools of themselves in public, do you really want to showcase these things nut-bags?

[reagansghost]

Trump's self-delusion springs from his firm belief that teabillies comprise the majority of the voters.........WAY off

35-40% max, and that's on a good day

[Getin the ring]

Liberals are so triggered, such a sad state of mind to live ones life in

[Darth Omar]

Hello Darth,



So far, anyway. And I have no problem with being wrong about that.



Maybe I misjudged Gabbard. I got the impression she was a little too pro-military for my taste.

I am totally against war. That's one of the things which drew me to Marianne Williamson. She wants to establish a Department Of Peace.

No way I would vote for Trump. Not happening. I have sworn to vote for any Dem nominee over Trump. I shall favor whomever I really want until the DNC, but after that I am all for whomever has the best chance to unseat Trump. He is that bad.

Just one scandal after another with him. So many that the public is blinded to it, has built up a tolerance to it.

That's the problem with the Republican party. They have built up a tolerance to Trump, even though many Republicans really know in their hearts that he is bad juju. They just come up with all kinds of ways to justify supporting him. Don't do it. He is a crook.

What scandals lol? Is Trump a crime-less crook?

We just ended a two year *fruitless* search for a scandal led by an SC, no less.

Gabbard has served in the military but she’s no military freak. She’s a threat to the eternal war addicts, a socialist and minority woman, and she can’t get any traction in the Democrat party.

I can’t figure today’s Democrats out.

[PoliTalker]

What scandals lol? Is Trump a crime-less crook?

We just ended a two year *fruitless* search for a scandal led by an SC, no less.

Gabbard has served in the military but she’s no military freak. She’s a threat to the eternal war addicts, a socialist and minority woman, and she can’t get any traction in the Democrat party.

I can’t figure today’s Democrats out.

It's interesting.

Bernie is popular, but he has no corporate backing. He's popular with the voters. Problem is that means all the superdelegates are against him. Warren has the same problem. None of them get the backing of the machine unless they kiss up to big money power.

Many of them have great messages, but when did we ever elect somebody based on what their philosophy?

It's all about the money.

Dems will probably end up with Biden. What we are going through now is little more than a show. An exploration of ideas, but nobody is running away with it. If that continues we will end up with Biden.

That's why we have to pass local anti-corruption laws all over the nation in cities, counties and States. We have to make anti-corruption a new thing that goes viral politically. No big money in politics. Public financing of elections. Ranked Choice Voting. Automatic voter registration when of age.

If we really want to live up to the Constitution that's what we need to do.

When anti-corruption laws become the rage, and the law in most States, the federal govt will have to follow.

What we have now is not working.

We currently have legalized corruption.

It is totally legal to throw money at government and get results.

And Congress won't fix it because most of them are on the take. Certainly the most powerful ones are.

So we have to force it over time.

[Earl]

There were 607,083 Muslims reported in the 2001 census in the Greater London area.[1] In the 2011 census Office for National Statistics, the proportion of Muslims in London had risen to 12.4% of the population (21% of England's Muslims). In the boroughs of Newham and Tower Hamlets, the percentages of Muslims were over 30%.”

In the 2011 census...8 years ago.

Lol.