Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Congress Rejects FISA Reform

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default Congress Rejects FISA Reform

    House recently voted against an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702, proposed by Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). FISA Section 702, which was authorized as an addition to the 1978 FISA Act in 2008, was intended to be used solely to monitor communications by foreign nationals outside of the United States.

    In recent years, Edward Snowden’s revelations showed that Section 702 provided the government with a legal cover to collect data on communications between millions of U.S. citizens without warrants or probable cause. According to a National Security Agency (NSA) transparency report from April 2019, in 2018 communications by U.S. citizens or residents were queried 9,637 times, over 2,000 more queries than the previous year.

    The Amash-Lofgren Amendment would have withheld funding for Section 702 in the budget for fiscal year 2020. If it had passed, any requests for Section 702 funding by governmental bodies such as the NSA would have had to make an express commitment to not use those funds on the warrantless collection of U.S. citizens’ data.

    Forty-seven organizations, including the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and FreedomWorks, urged Congress in a June letter to pass the amendment in order to “significantly advance the privacy rights of people within the United States.” Two Republican representatives, Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), rose to defend the amendment during the ten minutes of debate it was afforded. Despite these endorsements, the amendment was struck down 252-175, with over 100 members of each party voting against it.

    This is not Justin Amash’s first encounter with FISA reform. In 2017, when Section 702 was up for reauthorization, he sponsored a similar amendment. It would have made warrants necessary “to collect communications of or about a U.S. person.” The bill was cosponsored by a range of representatives from both parties. That attempt, too, was quickly struck down, this time by the Trump administration. Then-press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a statement stating that “the Administration strongly opposes the ‘USA Rights’ amendment to the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act.”

    The Trump administration’s position on FISA reform is especially inconsistent in light of President Trump’s numerous damning indictments of FISA abuse on Twitter. This inconsistency is clear in the actions of other notable critics of FISA abuse, including Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.). Nunes published a June 2018 memo in which lamented the “troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.” Yet Nunes was among those who voted against the Amash-Lofgren Amendment. Responding to an attack during a town hall with Michiganders, Justin Amash claimed that Nunes and the Republicans who criticized FISA usage by the FBI but rejected his amendment “want to protect the president, but the rest of you? Forget about it.” The latest FISA vote seems to confirm this accusation.

    The rejection of Amash and Lofgren’s amendment was also illustrated Democratic hypocrisy. Representatives such as Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who has repeatedly claimed that President Trump has abused executive power and colluded with foreign powers, voted against the amendment, allowing the executive to spy on American citizens. Notably, Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a candidate in the Democratic presidential primary, who has tweeted about Trump more than any other candidate, also voted against the amendment.


    Those who rejected reform would have done well to heed Jim Jordan’s Twitter warning from last month, which he repeated during the debate:
    “If the intel community can target the President for political reasons, imagine what they can do to any one of us.”
    It seems, however, that Congress has no intention of pushing back against threats to Americans’ privacy, despite their constant claims to the contrary.
    https://spectator.org/congress-rejects-fisa-reform/

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Remember who is for and against the Bill of Rights kids.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Celticguy For This Post:

    anatta (06-25-2019)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Remember who is for and against the Bill of Rights kids.
    Section 702 employs general warrants banned by the Constitution

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Section 702 employs general warrants banned by the Constitution
    Scary stuff there...
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Celticguy For This Post:

    Sailor (06-25-2019)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Scary stuff there...
    Extremely.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    So the Democrats weaponized the FISA Warrant process , illegally it seems.
    And now want to limit the ability to use it against them, possibly? cute

    Mr. Barr is coming with the beat down stick,
    can't wait
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,979
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Remember who is for and against the Bill of Rights kids.
    Who is that, asshole?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-18-2019, 02:52 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-07-2019, 08:33 AM
  3. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 03-06-2018, 01:03 PM
  4. US Congress Rejects UN Internet Takeover
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2012, 03:11 PM
  5. is patent reform by congress a good idea
    By Schadenfreude in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-28-2011, 03:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •