Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 789101112 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 168

Thread: So getting dirt from Russians on other politicians is bad?

  1. #151 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Via several cutouts lol?
    Three in a row for you, dumbshit.

    “Steele, who had been a Russia expert for Britain's MI6, was hired by Fusion as a private contractor, and at the time was not a "foreign agent." His payment was a campaign expenditure, not a campaign contribution, and was therefore legal.”

    https://news.yahoo.com/what-is-the-s...191857892.html

    “Experts we spoke to described a range of differences between the type of information Trump said he would accept and what Clinton’s campaign was paying Fusion GPS for. The main difference is the role of a foreign government.

    "Working hand-in-hand with a foreign power for information intended to influence an election is different than hiring a private firm that then hired somebody who had been a former intelligence agent," said Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law.

    "Everybody does opposition research," she added. "The issue here is the foreign government."

    “While Russia’s meddling was intended to help Trump win, Steele was contracted by Fusion GPS to find out more about Trump’s ties to Russia. "That has nothing to do with a candidate soliciting something from a foreign power," former CIA intelligence agent Glenn Carle said.

    "One is collecting intelligence and the other is an active measure by a foreign power to achieve a political end of some sort," Carle said. "There’s no comparison at all."”

    https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...view-and-why-/

    "While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

  2. #152 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Not what Mueller said so..........

    Stop believing Buzzfeed sucker. You is gettin played homey
    Mueller said NOTHING about the phone ping, dumbshit.

  3. #153 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Three in a row for you, dumbshit.

    “Steele, who had been a Russia expert for Britain's MI6, was hired by Fusion as a private contractor, and at the time was not a "foreign agent." His payment was a campaign expenditure, not a campaign contribution, and was therefore legal.”

    https://news.yahoo.com/what-is-the-s...191857892.html

    “Experts we spoke to described a range of differences between the type of information Trump said he would accept and what Clinton’s campaign was paying Fusion GPS for. The main difference is the role of a foreign government.

    "Working hand-in-hand with a foreign power for information intended to influence an election is different than hiring a private firm that then hired somebody who had been a former intelligence agent," said Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law.

    "Everybody does opposition research," she added. "The issue here is the foreign government."

    “While Russia’s meddling was intended to help Trump win, Steele was contracted by Fusion GPS to find out more about Trump’s ties to Russia. "That has nothing to do with a candidate soliciting something from a foreign power," former CIA intelligence agent Glenn Carle said.

    "One is collecting intelligence and the other is an active measure by a foreign power to achieve a political end of some sort," Carle said. "There’s no comparison at all."”

    https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...view-and-why-/

    "While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924
    Transactional Russian collusion lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. #154 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Transactional Russian collusion lol.
    Willfully ignorant illiterate.


  5. #155 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Willfully ignorant illiterate.

    You have a better term for it lol?

    And do you think you can float it past non-gullible voters?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  6. #156 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    You have a better term for it lol?

    And do you think you can float it past non-gullible voters?
    Yep. Commercial transaction.

    Do voters get to vote directly on federal laws? Nope, they sure don't dumbfuck.

  7. #157 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Mueller said NOTHING about the phone ping, dumbshit.
    Buzzfeed isn’t a credible source ass bag

    Mueller said Cohen wasn’t in Prague. Is Mueller a liar?

  8. #158 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Buzzfeed isn’t a credible source ass bag

    Mueller said Cohen wasn’t in Prague. Is Mueller a liar?
    Mueller said Cohen wasn't in Prague. He said NOTHING about Chen's phone, illiterate cunt. What's wring with your comprehension skills? Wait. EVERTHING

    I've never read Buzzfeed, shitstain.

    https://hotair.com/archives/2019/04/...-prague-phone/
    https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/inv...229424084.html
    https://www.businessinsider.com/mich...russia-2018-12

    Fucking moron.

  9. #159 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Mueller said Cohen wasn't in Prague. He said NOTHING about Chen's phone, illiterate cunt. What's wring with your comprehension skills? Wait. EVERTHING

    I've never read Buzzfeed, shitstain.

    https://hotair.com/archives/2019/04/...-prague-phone/
    https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/inv...229424084.html
    https://www.businessinsider.com/mich...russia-2018-12

    Fucking moron.
    Cohen wasn’t in Prague. Steele lied. Buzzfeed lied. You soak up the lies.

    Just shows how ignorant and desperate you are. Even your hero Bobby Muller tells you Cohen wasn’t in Prague yet you still think he was.

    Oh wait you believe his phone was there.

    Tell us Dick Tracy. Why would Cohen give someone his phone to travel to Prague?

    You have been reading too many Tom Clancy books

  10. #160 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Cohen wasn’t in Prague. Steele lied. Buzzfeed lied. You soak up the lies.

    Just shows how ignorant and desperate you are. Even your hero Bobby Muller tells you Cohen wasn’t in Prague yet you still think he was.

    Oh wait you believe his phone was there.

    Tell us Dick Tracy. Why would Cohen give someone his phone to travel to Prague?

    You have been reading too many Tom Clancy books
    Illiterate cunt. Have someone that understands English read my post to you. Where did I say Cohen was in Prague?

    Refute that one of his phones was in Prague.

    I'll wait, delusional cocksucker.

  11. #161 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Illiterate cunt. Have someone that understands English read my post to you. Where did I say Cohen was in Prague?

    Refute that one of his phones was in Prague.

    I'll wait, delusional cocksucker.
    Where is your proof it was?

    Buzzfeed? Mueller shot them down bitch

  12. #162 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,458
    Thanks
    12,200
    Thanked 14,312 Times in 10,503 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Where is your proof it was?

    Buzzfeed? Mueller shot them down bitch
    I just gave you 3, dumbuck.

    Mueller was silent on the phone ping.

    Are you ALWAYS drunk?

  13. #163 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,306
    Thanks
    13,304
    Thanked 40,973 Times in 32,288 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Well some of the more dishonest Trumpsters will deny that he colluded with Russia. But the ones who are only mildly dishonest will just bring up Hillary or Obama to try to change the subject.
    why do you think Mueller is a dishonest Trumpster?.......

  14. #164 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Yep. Commercial transaction.

    Do voters get to vote directly on federal laws? Nope, they sure don't dumbfuck.
    I hope voters aren’t stupid enough to think transactional collusion is any different than the form of collusion Trump was *falsely* accused of for two years.

    Why did they have to lie about Trump for so long?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  15. #165 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post



    What say you lefties?


    No thread bans because I want to hear the spin.
    Well if being able to think critically makes you a “lefty” here goes.

    It is incredibly dumb comments like these where you don’t see the threat of foreign interference with our public institutions is an excellent example of how the current Republican has alienated today’s youth, and correctly so, as the party of stupid.

    Besides this example of oblivious obtuseness, emphasizing the purity and piety of ignorance and anti-intellectualism and militant science denial the GOP has essentially rebranded itself the derp, derp party and it’s why most of today’s youth and pretty much anyone with above average intelligence has abandoned the GOP in droves.

    Now do you understand the majority of the nations attitude towards those who can’t figure out something as simple why foreign interference is a direct assault on our nation?

    It’s really that simple. If you can’t figure that out...well it would probably be impossible to simplify it further.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-12-2018, 05:06 PM
  2. APP - What dirt on Hillary did the Russians have?
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2018, 06:16 AM
  3. Replies: 109
    Last Post: 08-06-2017, 07:05 AM
  4. I you don't want Russians digging dirt up on you...
    By Waternark in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-26-2017, 05:12 AM
  5. Russians Discussed Dirt They Had on Trump
    By Buckly J. Ewer in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-30-2017, 09:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •