Nope, illiterate stupid fuck. Try to master English.
“Steele, who had been a Russia expert for Britain's MI6, was hired by Fusion as a private contractor, and at the time was not a "foreign agent." His payment was a campaign expenditure, not a campaign contribution, and was therefore legal.”
https://news.yahoo.com/what-is-the-s...191857892.html
“Experts we spoke to described a range of differences between the type of information Trump said he would accept and what Clinton’s campaign was paying Fusion GPS for.
The main difference is the role of a foreign government.
"Working hand-in-hand with a foreign power for information intended to influence an election is different than hiring a private firm that then hired somebody who had been a former intelligence agent," said Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law.
"Everybody does opposition research," she added. "The issue here is the foreign government."
“While Russia’s meddling was intended to help Trump win, Steele was contracted by Fusion GPS to find out more about Trump’s ties to Russia. "That has nothing to do with a candidate soliciting something from a foreign power," former CIA intelligence agent Glenn Carle said.
"One is collecting intelligence and the other is an active measure by a foreign power to achieve a political end of some sort," Carle said. "There’s no comparison at all."”
https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...view-and-why-/
"While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924
FEC Chair
Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a US election," she said in a statement.
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
what is the difference between accepting information, and paying for information?
hint - only one is commercial in nature
Last edited by zymurgy; 06-18-2019 at 01:06 PM.
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
morality is a set of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative and mutually beneficial relationships.
Trump Wins,
by definition https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/trump
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
No, he said indicting Trump was never an option because we can't indict a sitting president.
And while there is no smoking gun, it's more than obvious that Trump colluded with Russia. Is it really not enough that he recently admitted he would if a foreign government offered?
I didn’t say it was a financial contribution, illiterate fuck. Receiving info like Junior did was receiving “something of value”.
Look up the definition of “contribution” in the federal code, dumbfuck. Then get back to me.
Try to brush up on your comprehension skills, stupid fuck.
Moron
Last edited by domer76; 06-18-2019 at 02:06 PM.
Truth Detector (06-18-2019)
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Bookmarks