Page 18 of 26 FirstFirst ... 8141516171819202122 ... LastLast
Results 256 to 270 of 389

Thread: What is the difference between Trump saying he'd accept foreign information

  1. #256 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    im not doing busywork if you're not even taking a position on it.


    You took a position, bitch. Prove it.

    Flaccid little punk can't perform.


  2. #257 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,127 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    You took a position, bitch. Prove it.

    Flaccid little punk can't perform.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrod.../#56e1c1346867

    start here.

    the certified approach is to downplay. apparently

  3. #258 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    on political rivals last Wednesday and Trump directly asking Russia to find Clinton's Emails back in 2016?

    Actually not much of a difference, except this time Trump is putting the request right out there, sending a public invitation to all his autocratic buddies, openly inviting foreign powers to interfere in our election for his behalf

    And why not, Trump cares little for respecting historical institutions, he knows his GOP lackeys don't have the backbone to say anything, he's assured billy Barr ain't going to care, and he has a whole media network that will not only defend him but will quickly portray any effort to expose say North Korea's involvement as a witch hunt

    The Democrats ought to immediately pass legislation making it illegal to accept any kind of assistence from any foreign nation in our elections and quickly forward it to Mitch, put the Senate invertebrates on the spot
    Of course.....its not like paying 11 million dollars to a foreign agent to collect dirt on a political opponent from a foreign nation. You mean THAT DIFFERENCE? Or the difference of using that paid for foreign information as a basis to spy upon that political opponent? That difference? Or do you mean the actual difference between a baited accusation HYPOTHETICAL situation question that has never actually taken place and the actual situation where HILLARY did pay for dirt from a RUSSIAN SOURCE instead just acting like they did? That difference?

    Trump "baited" the left wing idiots again in order to expose their PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION to the voters of this nation. They "feign outrage" over some stupid hypothetical yet support the actual situation where foreign information was actually weaponized for political reasons.

    Lefty's never seem to be concerned about the 1st law of logic and reason.....THE EXCLUDED MIDDLE, where its impossible for something to be true and false at the same instance. They can't be outraged in one hand and supportive of the actual application on the other hand. AND THE PEOPLE THAT VOTE see this hypocrisy. Just why do you assume Mr. Donald Trump won the election in the first place.....RUSSIAN COLLUSION? No......the left has taken advantage of the people for to long, taken them for granted while calling them stupid, smelly, uneducated, that's why THE DON is resting his ass behind the resolute desk at 1600 Pa. Av. as we speak. Turns out the smart ass elites are not the smartest people in every room they walk into....just ask Jim Acosta, Robert Mueller, James Comey, Andy McCabe, yada, yada, yada, Brennan, Clapper, Hillary.
    Last edited by Ralph; 06-16-2019 at 12:12 PM.

  4. #259 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrod.../#56e1c1346867

    start here.

    the certified approach is to downplay. apparently
    I love his use of the word "purportedly".

    “The U.S. intelligence community purportedly has examined the allegations…”

    “The TRUMP operation was both supported and directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Its aim was to sow discord both within the U.S. itself, but more especially within the Transatlantic alliance.”

    No shit. It worked, didn't it?

    Laughable. He claims the Steele dossier was written by a Russian. Priceless!

    Still waiting on proof, limpdick.

  5. #260 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I love his use of the word "purportedly".

    “The U.S. intelligence community purportedly has examined the allegations…”

    “The TRUMP operation was both supported and directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Its aim was to sow discord both within the U.S. itself, but more especially within the Transatlantic alliance.”

    No shit. It worked, didn't it?

    Laughable. He claims the Steele dossier was written by a Russian. Priceless!

    Still waiting on proof, limpdick.
    Perhaps......the information that you request might turn up in the court room when Hillary is subpoenaed and indicted along side of Comey, McCabe. It appears that Mr. Mueller concluded that RUSSIA was involved with the STEELE DOSSIER when he attempted to declare that the agent that contracted some of Trump's campaign team was a RUSSIAN AGENT...when in reality they were working for our own federal agencies.

    Your questions will be answered soon enough....the only problem will be THE ANSWERS you will not enjoy. Mr. Durham is working on your questions right now.

  6. #261 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    Perhaps......the information that you request might turn up in the court room when Hillary is subpoenaed and indicted along side of Comey, McCabe. It appears that Mr. Mueller concluded that RUSSIA was involved with the STEELE DOSSIER when he attempted to declare that the agent that contracted some of Trump's campaign team was a RUSSIAN AGENT...when in reality they were working for our own federal agencies.

    Your questions will be answered soon enough....the only problem will be THE ANSWERS you will not enjoy. Mr. Durham is working on your questions right now.
    Indicted for what, shitstain?

    You must be referring to Kilimnik. Did Manafort know he was working for the US whn he provided the polling data? Of course not, you fucking moron. Gates testified that it was understood that it would make its way to Deripaska and then to the Kremlin.

    Don't hold your breath on those indictments, halfwit.

  7. #262 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    Hillary's PAC hired the same DOMESTIC company a right wing PAC did ya dumbass
    Not an argument. Irrelevant.

    But, I understand your need to go there. You can't answer the other questions

    Did the right wing pack hire a law firm to hire Fusion GPS to hire Christopher Steele to go to Russia? Did they?

    Nice try.

    You aren't very good at this

  8. #263 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Not an argument. Irrelevant.
    bullshit

    what law did Hillary's PAC break

    go

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to reagansghost For This Post:

    domer76 (06-16-2019)

  10. #264 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I can't get into the NYT article.

    Elias is the Perkins Coie attorney. I notice his name is not Hillary Clinton. But, prove he's lying.

    "It's important to note that the question raised at the time was if Marc had a 'dossier' before the election and put together pitches to media outlets on information in it. Neither of those statements were true," the source said. "What was eventually published as the 'dossier' by Buzzfeed wasn't in Marc's possession before the election, and like most people, he read it when it was published. While he was certainly familiar with some, but not all, of the information in it, from the research that was being done, he didn't have and hadn't seen the full document, nor was he involved in pitching it to reporters."

    https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/polit...ign/index.html

    Prove that Brain Fallon was lying. I also notice his name is not Hillary Clinton.

    Write Fusion, Perkins Coie, the DNC and the Clinton campaign with your stupid fucking questions as to why. I wasn't part of the campaign, idiot.

    As usual, you fail miserably again.

    Chronic loser.
    I humbly accept your concession. Notice I said the Clinton Campaign. Unless of course you are saying she isn't responsible for what her campaign did? is that what you are saying?

  11. #265 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I humbly accept your concession. Notice I said the Clinton Campaign. Unless of course you are saying she isn't responsible for what her campaign did? is that what you are saying?
    what did her campaign do genius

  12. #266 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I humbly accept your concession. Notice I said the Clinton Campaign. Unless of course you are saying she isn't responsible for what her campaign did? is that what you are saying?
    Notice my response, stupid fuck.

    "Write Fusion, Perkins Coie, the DNC and the Clinton campaign with your stupid fucking questions as to why. I wasn't part of the campaign, idiot."

    Why did they deny it? Because it wasn't true.

    Nope, it sure isn't what I'm saying. What I have been saying dozens of times, cuntwhistle, is this:

    "While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

    Illiterate loser.

  13. #267 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    The notion that Russia had the capability to hack Hillary's server but waited for a a request from Trump to actually do the hacking is absolutely preposterous. If foreign intelligence agencies have the capability to gather intelligence from other countries, they simply gather the information. They do not wait for other countries to give permission.
    Sure, but it's far too great of a coincidence that they did it five hours after Trump literally invited them too. It's like Brian Kilmeade said, nothing is for free. By Trump asking for their help, he's communicating that if they help him, he'll be their man on the inside.

  14. #268 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Got to love the "with his tongue and cheek comments," he was joking, how many times have we heard that defense from the Trumpkins, oh, he "was only joking," beautiful

    Even if what you say was accurate and Russia has already had the Emails, Trump invited them in, basically telling them he had no problem if the Russians wanted to get involved in our election, in fact, he told them he welcomed it, giving them the green light.
    What was Russia able to do after this "green light" that they were not already able to do?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  15. #269 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Not an argument. Irrelevant.

    But, I understand your need to go there. You can't answer the other questions

    Did the right wing pack hire a law firm to hire Fusion GPS to hire Christopher Steele to go to Russia? Did they?

    Nice try.

    You aren't very good at this
    “While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

  16. #270 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    bullshit

    what law did Hillary's PAC break

    go
    They can’t answer because they are ignorant of the law

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-09-2018, 07:28 PM
  2. DEUTSCHE BANK IS TURNING OVER INFORMATION ON THE trump
    By Bill in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 147
    Last Post: 07-23-2017, 09:29 PM
  3. Does Trump have inside information on the Russian hacks?
    By Cancel 2020.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 01-16-2017, 06:09 PM
  4. Does everyone know and accept that Trump won and Hilly lost
    By The_Donald in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11-25-2016, 08:34 PM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-02-2016, 01:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •