Page 13 of 26 FirstFirst ... 39101112131415161723 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 195 of 389

Thread: What is the difference between Trump saying he'd accept foreign information

  1. #181 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Nope, illiterate dumfuck, she wasn't. How in the fuck you morons jump from simple English to your bizarre fantasies is beyond me. Merely your pathetic lack of reading comprehension.

    You mean paid a company to do opposition research? Even you can't be that stupid.

    Wait. Yes you are.

    Paid a company to get Russian assistance

  2. #182 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,473
    Thanks
    12,206
    Thanked 14,323 Times in 10,512 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Paid a company to get Russian assistance
    Paid a company who subcontracted with an expert in Russian affairs who had great contacts. There's no indication that Clinton knew that Fusion had hired Steele.

    But, I'll spell it out for you again, you illiterate fucking moron.

    “While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

    Let me know which of those simple English words befuddle you and I'll try to take it down to a third grade level.

  3. #183 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Paid a company to get Russian assistance
    Amazing isn’t it lol?

    They start out attacking Trump for saying *he might* do something and the lefties spend the rest of the week defending what Hillary *actually did*.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (06-16-2019), Earl (06-16-2019), Stretch (06-15-2019)

  5. #184 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,473
    Thanks
    12,206
    Thanked 14,323 Times in 10,512 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Amazing isn’t it lol?

    They start out attacking Trump for saying *he might* do something and the lefties spend the rest of the week defending what Hillary *actually did*.
    Once again for you dense cocksuckers.

    “While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

    Whether you stupid fucks want to admit it or not, Trump "actually" solicited information on national TV.

    11 CFR 300.2

    (m)To solicit. For the purposes of part 300, to solicit means to ask, request, or recommend, explicitly or implicitly, that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation is an oral or written communication that, construed as reasonably understood in the context in which it is made, contains a clear message asking, requesting, or recommending that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation may be made directly or indirectly. The context includes the conduct of persons involved in the communication. A solicitation does not include mere statements of political support or mere guidance as to the applicability of a particular law or regulation.

  6. #185 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    Yeah, publicly gave a shout-out for all the world to see. Same tired old sarcastic cartoon about Trump.
    Hey!!! Russia!!!!!!!! Could you please find all those 35,000 Hillary emails please?????????
    Yes, and while you're at it Russia- And if you are still listening, could you please show us the film of those hookers peeing on Donald Trump?


  7. #186 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "The Dems sent an English agent to Russia to find out what it could about Trump and Russian deals." !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Priceless! Thank-you for that admission.
    HA Ha Do you know that he was merely an employee and England is not our foe? Are you actually unable to understand the difference? Russia was working for Russian advantage. What foreign nation got benefit from the Fusion oppo research. Are you really unable to get it? I worry about you/ This is not hard.

  8. #187 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    yeah. dems were actively seeking the dirt from foreigners. they're worse.
    Well, you are absolutely wrong. there is that to consider.

  9. #188 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    on political rivals last Wednesday and Trump directly asking Russia to find Clinton's Emails back in 2016?

    Actually not much of a difference, except this time Trump is putting the request right out there, sending a public invitation to all his autocratic buddies, openly inviting foreign powers to interfere in our election for his behalf

    And why not, Trump cares little for respecting historical institutions, he knows his GOP lackeys don't have the backbone to say anything, he's assured billy Barr ain't going to care, and he has a whole media network that will not only defend him but will quickly portray any effort to expose say North Korea's involvement as a witch hunt

    The Democrats ought to immediately pass legislation making it illegal to accept any kind of assistance from any foreign nation in our elections and quickly forward it to Mitch, put the Senate invertebrates on the spot
    The emoluments clause is in the constitution. That is exactly what it does. Trump does not care.

  10. #189 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Paid a company who subcontracted with an expert in Russian affairs who had great contacts. There's no indication that Clinton knew that Fusion had hired Steele.

    But, I'll spell it out for you again, you illiterate fucking moron.

    “While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

    https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

    Let me know which of those simple English words befuddle you and I'll try to take it down to a third grade level.
    So you are saying that Crooked Hillary paid millions to Perkins Coie who then hired Steele who then worked with RUSSIANS? And she didn't know anything about it?

    What happened afterward is irrelevant unless you contend that the entire goal of Crooked Hillary was to pay millions to Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS to find information to GIVE to the FBI? Was the entire intent to find information to give to the FBI? Because if it wasn't that Steele did give it to the FBI is irrelevant.

    What was the original intent of hiring Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS?

    Oh and if it was so above board as you are trying to make it seem, why did Crooked Hillary deny it for soooooo long. You know, why did she LIE about it?

    The questions don't get easier. But, I applaud your desperate attempts at spinning this.

    As I said in APP, what Trump told Stepphy was brilliant. Set you leftists up big time. You are proving it with every single reply

  11. #190 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    So you are saying that Crooked Hillary paid millions to Perkins Coie who then hired Steele who then worked with RUSSIANS? And she didn't know anything about it?

    What happened afterward is irrelevant unless you contend that the entire goal of Crooked Hillary was to pay millions to Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS to find information to GIVE to the FBI? Was the entire intent to find information to give to the FBI? Because if it wasn't that Steele did give it to the FBI is irrelevant.

    What was the original intent of hiring Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS?

    Oh and if it was so above board as you are trying to make it seem, why did Crooked Hillary deny it for soooooo long. You know, why did she LIE about it?

    The questions don't get easier. But, I applaud your desperate attempts at spinning this.

    As I said in APP, what Trump told Stepphy was brilliant. Set you leftists up big time. You are proving it with every single reply


    You are off the reservation, get back in line. trump is walking the comment back so you should be too. Try to pay attention.

  12. #191 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    You are off the reservation, get back in line. trump is walking the comment back so you should be too. Try to pay attention.
    But you’re not defending a comment lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  13. #192 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    So you are saying that Crooked Hillary paid millions to Perkins Coie who then hired Steele who then worked with RUSSIANS? And she didn't know anything about it?

    What happened afterward is irrelevant unless you contend that the entire goal of Crooked Hillary was to pay millions to Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS to find information to GIVE to the FBI? Was the entire intent to find information to give to the FBI? Because if it wasn't that Steele did give it to the FBI is irrelevant.

    What was the original intent of hiring Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS?

    Oh and if it was so above board as you are trying to make it seem, why did Crooked Hillary deny it for soooooo long. You know, why did she LIE about it?

    The questions don't get easier. But, I applaud your desperate attempts at spinning this.

    As I said in APP, what Trump told Stepphy was brilliant. Set you leftists up big time. You are proving it with every single reply
    There’s better evidence of collusion between Hillary and Obama’s FBI than there ever was between Trump and Russia.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  14. #193 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    You are off the reservation, get back in line. trump is walking the comment back so you should be too. Try to pay attention.
    I don't walk shit back. Even if Trump is walking it back. Mission accomplished. People are talking about Crooked Hillary conspiring with Russians. Something you leftists don't want to do.

    Don't worry, AG Barr will explain it all to you soon enough

  15. #194 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,473
    Thanks
    12,206
    Thanked 14,323 Times in 10,512 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    So you are saying that Crooked Hillary paid millions to Perkins Coie who then hired Steele who then worked with RUSSIANS? And she didn't know anything about it?

    What happened afterward is irrelevant unless you contend that the entire goal of Crooked Hillary was to pay millions to Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS to find information to GIVE to the FBI? Was the entire intent to find information to give to the FBI? Because if it wasn't that Steele did give it to the FBI is irrelevant.

    What was the original intent of hiring Perkins Coie to hire Steele to work with RUSSIANS?

    Oh and if it was so above board as you are trying to make it seem, why did Crooked Hillary deny it for soooooo long. You know, why did she LIE about it?

    The questions don't get easier. But, I applaud your desperate attempts at spinning this.

    As I said in APP, what Trump told Stepphy was brilliant. Set you leftists up big time. You are proving it with every single reply
    No, illiterate shitstain, I didn't say that. Try to reread what I ACTUALLY said, dumbfuck.

    I said nothing of the sort that Hillary hired him to give information the the FBI. How in the fuck to you arrive at that conclusion? Oh, that's right. YOU'RE AN ILLITERATE MORON.

    Steele was so alarmed at what he was finding, he took it upon himself to contact the FBI.

    What was the original intent? Are you really that stupid. Oh wait, you are.

    Tell me, what EXACTLY did she lie about? Be specific and provide proof.

    You are the most illiterate dumbfuck on this form. No wonder you are a two time member of the Illiterate Dumfuck club.

    Massive idiot.

  16. #195 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,507
    Thanks
    78,192
    Thanked 23,685 Times in 17,936 Posts
    Groans
    38,863
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Amazing isn’t it lol?

    They start out attacking Trump for saying *he might* do something and the lefties spend the rest of the week defending what Hillary *actually did*.
    It is amazing.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-09-2018, 07:28 PM
  2. DEUTSCHE BANK IS TURNING OVER INFORMATION ON THE trump
    By Bill in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 147
    Last Post: 07-23-2017, 09:29 PM
  3. Does Trump have inside information on the Russian hacks?
    By Cancel 2020.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 01-16-2017, 06:09 PM
  4. Does everyone know and accept that Trump won and Hilly lost
    By The_Donald in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11-25-2016, 08:34 PM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-02-2016, 01:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •