Hypocrisy beyond belief

[Loving91390]

Your usual meaningless babble.

Nobody "forced" the banks to make those loans. They thought that they had an ironclad guarantee that they could make risky loans and pull in tons of profit at no risk. They went way farther than anyone expected. Just another example of unfettered greed.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Look up the Community Reinvestment Act ... CRA .

[rjhenn]

Look up the Community Reinvestment Act ... CRA .

You should look up the CRA. You appear to have some warped right-wing delusions about it. It didn't "force" banks to do anything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[domer76]

Trump is doing a great job .... and YOU are a MORON !

[domer76]

And Obama added $10 trillion , and not a peep out of you pricks !

Fuck off and die !

He inherited a major recession on the verge of a full blown depression, you fucking moron. Of course, the deficit is going to explode.

What's you Liar-in-Chief's excuse, shitstain?

[Gonzomin]

And Obama added $10 trillion , and not a peep out of you pricks !

Fuck off and die !

I suppose you were in grade school when Obama came into office facing a 2nd great depression. It was a rough time and fixing Bush's right wing economic system was expensive. There was a lot of discussion about it. Obama actually set us on a path to lower the debt. PEEP PEEP.

[Loving91390]

I suppose you were in grade school when Obama came into office facing a 2nd great depression. It was a rough time and fixing Bush's right wing economic system was expensive. There was a lot of discussion about it. Obama actually set us on a path to lower the debt. PEEP PEEP.

Ya ... right !

Just the interest on Obama’s debt will never lower our debt ... fuck you Obama !

[Gonzomin]

Look up the Community Reinvestment Act ... CRA .

As usual your thundering ignorance is on display. The crash was a product of banking greed. They were selling financial instruments across the globe that were backed by mortgages. In the beginning, the mortgages were safe, but bankers saw a huge pot of gold in selling more. So bankers dropped mortgage standards, instructing home lenders to weaken them. When they used them up, they dropped standards again and again. Banks had no liability in the crappy investments because they immediately sold them off. They also had power over the ratings agencies who did not do their jobs. The money was too good. I am sure you did not hear ratings agencies tell congress they would AAA rate anything banks gave them.
This Comm, Inv Act is a typical red herring concocted by bankers and Repubs to divert attention from who was to blame.
Greenspan's Libertarian beliefs were also a factor. He believed in the end that bankers would do the right thing for the country. He was wrong.

[Loving91390]

As usual your thundering ignorance is on display. The crash was a product of banking greed. They were selling financial instruments across the globe that were backed by mortgages. In the beginning, the mortgages were safe, but bankers saw a huge pot of gold in selling more. So bankers dropped mortgage standards, instructing home lenders to weaken them. When they used them up, they dropped standards again and again. Banks had no liability in the crappy investments because they immediately sold them off. They also had power over the ratings agencies who did not do their jobs. The money was too good. I am sure you did not hear ratings agencies tell congress they would AAA rate anything banks gave them.
This Comm, Inv Act is a typical red herring concocted by bankers and Repubs to divert attention from who was to blame.
Greenspan's Libertarian beliefs were also a factor. He believed in the end that bankers would do the right thing for the country. He was wrong.

So the bankers did it ......

[Gonzomin]

And Obama added $10 trillion , and not a peep out of you pricks !

Fuck off and die !

I suppose you were in grade school when Obama came into office facing a 2nd great depression. It was a rough time and fixing Bush's right wing economic system was expensive. There was a lot of discussion about it. Obama actually set us on a path to lower the debt. PEEP PEEP.

[Gonzomin]

So the bankers did it ......

Yes. Read up on SWAPs too. Not only did bankers sell weaker and weaker investment properties but they sold insurance on it. They gutting trillions of dollars across the globe.

[Loving91390]

I suppose you were in grade school when Obama came into office facing a 2nd great depression. It was a rough time and fixing Bush's right wing economic system was expensive. There was a lot of discussion about it. Obama actually set us on a path to lower the debt. PEEP PEEP.

Obama’s presidency will never lower our debt ...

[Evmetro]

The Clinton campaign hired an American firm, who had previously been under contract to Republicans, who hired an attorney who hired a British agent who used his Russian contacts for information, which was never used by the campaign. At no time did any member of the Clinton campaign directly contact any Russians nor are their any documented contacts between Russians and the Clinton campaign.

At the same time the Trump campaign had hundreds of documented direct contacts with Russsians, in fact Russians were all over the campaign, and they also held verified meetings with Russians purposely aimed at getting Russian help in the campaign.

And you are now telling us the Clinton campaign compares to Trump's in terms of foreign influence?

If you read the primary sources rather than echoing the narratives of demogogues you too could know the "facts"

Contracting a third party to aquire information from other countries is just as dirty as seeking the information directly. Just because hillary and the dnc laundered their dirty information, doesn't mean it's clean.

In the hypothetical situation that Trump responded to, he was asked if he would view dirty info if it was offered, which is not as ugly as how the dnc and Hillary actually did the seeking.

[Legion]

Contracting a third party to aquire information from other countries is just as dirty as seeking the information directly. Just because hillary and the dnc laundered their dirty information, doesn't mean it's clean.

In the hypothetical situation that Trump responded to, he was asked if he would view dirty info if it was offered, which is not as ugly as how the dnc and Hillary actually did the seeking.

Indeed.

[domer76]

Contracting a third party to aquire information from other countries is just as dirty as seeking the information directly. Just because hillary and the dnc laundered their dirty information, doesn't mean it's clean.

In the hypothetical situation that Trump responded to, he was asked if he would view dirty info if it was offered, which is not as ugly as how the dnc and Hillary actually did the seeking.

Sure isn't, willfully ignorant dumbfuck.

"While it is illegal to accept contributions from foreign nationals for political campaigns (as Trump suggested he would do), “paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal,” as former chief counsel for the Federal Election Commission Lawrence Noble told The Washington Post. “It is considered a commercial transaction, which is not a contribution.”

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...he-2020/223924

FEC Chair

Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a US election," she said in a statement

Loser

[Gonzomin]

Obama’s presidency will never lower our debt ...

Since he is not president, you bumped into a real fact. Congrats. But Trump cranked it up 2 trillion for no reason at all. .Unless you favor the creation of a plutocracy. Trump obviously does.