Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: 2020 Battle Begins: Trump holds the high ground

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    57,224
    Thanks
    66,200
    Thanked 10,938 Times in 9,451 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,837 Times in 2,579 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    Damn, are you deluded. How is more then half the country not in favor of you, the high ground?
    WRONG; you are delusional thinking that half the country is with the Party of the Jackass.
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,792
    Thanks
    364
    Thanked 431 Times in 395 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 24 Times in 21 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose
    Pretty good analysis. Another anomaly I'd add to the OP is that there are voters out there similar to me. I don't like Trump, I consider him a horse's ass. He tweets and says stupid shit. But I will vote for him for several reasons.

    1. We all know he lies but he also speaks the truth about topics others are unwilling to. E.g. his recent ABC interview with Steph and exploitation of hrc's baggage last campaign.
    2. The Mueller with hunt.
    3. The Kav hearings.
    4. Dim extremism.
    a. Open borders
    b. Anti first amendment
    c. Green New Deal
    d. Local level accommodation of lawlessness
    e. Endless investigations as an agenda and policy
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    That's rather comical, "I don't like Trump," but half the reasons you tell us you will vote for him are defenses of Trump, and the few actual Democrat ideas you cite are the demogogues portrayal of those policies,
    The Democrats own all of these!
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    forget it, if Abraham Lincoln was resurrected and ran against Trump as a Democrat you'd vote for Trump
    You just demonstrated you have no knowledge of history. You have no idea who or what Lincoln is, why he ran for office, why he won, or who assassinated him and why.
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    And by the way, those "endless investigations" were initiated by Trump's own Justice Dept and conducted by GOP House and Senate Committees, the Democrats have only been at it for five months,
    WRONG. They were initiated by fake documents submitted by Democrats and kept alive as a witch hunt by Democrats. They are STILL trying to keep it alive as a witch hunt.
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    I'd bet the last decade of endless redundant GOP "investigations" never bother you or influenced your vote
    Void argument fallacy. What investigations are you referring to?

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,792
    Thanks
    364
    Thanked 431 Times in 395 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 24 Times in 21 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Here is the pertinent part of this column: If the election were held today, a generic Democrat would defeat Donald Trump. What makes the predictions game difficult is that Election Day isn't for 16 months, and generic Democrats do not exist.

    It is amusing to see such polls this early in the game. It makes me wonder if they have learned anything from 2016.
    Obviously not. They are using the same old song and playing on the same old rusty instruments.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Into the Night For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2019)

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    57,752
    Thanks
    15,784
    Thanked 14,833 Times in 11,130 Posts
    Groans
    621
    Groaned 1,012 Times in 960 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    The winner will have at least 270 votes, but less than 538.
    DRINK MOR KOFFEE


  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,824
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 591 Times in 463 Posts
    Groans
    35
    Groaned 77 Times in 71 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    He's been a racist right winger since day one.

    He's a COWARD who votes and supports EVERYTHING from the racist right including what dump does.

    Make no mistake he's one of them, no matter what he labels himself as.
    Why would a ď racist ď date a black woman ????

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    77,703
    Thanks
    3,777
    Thanked 18,334 Times in 15,166 Posts
    Groans
    1,882
    Groaned 2,028 Times in 1,925 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loving91390 View Post
    Why would a “ racist “ date a black woman ????
    TTQ did it and she's racist......

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2019)

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    5,188
    Thanks
    745
    Thanked 1,286 Times in 1,056 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 191 Times in 177 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Howard the Duck View Post
    The winner will likely take less than 50% of the vote.
    This is not possible, only a lefty could come up with a ridiculous notion like this.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    57,752
    Thanks
    15,784
    Thanked 14,833 Times in 11,130 Posts
    Groans
    621
    Groaned 1,012 Times in 960 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    This is not possible, only a lefty could come up with a ridiculous notion like this.
    1992, 1996, 2000, 2016.

    Keep in mind, illiterate retard, that my initial post that you quoted was a reference to the American public and not to the EC.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    Damn, are you deluded. How is more then half the country not in favor of you, the high ground?
    DRINK MOR KOFFEE


  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    5,188
    Thanks
    745
    Thanked 1,286 Times in 1,056 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 191 Times in 177 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Howard the Duck View Post
    1992, 1996, 2000, 2016.

    Keep in mind, illiterate retard, that my initial post that you quoted was a reference to the American public and not to the EC.
    In all four of those elections that you listed, the winner had more than 270.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,467
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 548 Times in 404 Posts
    Groans
    235
    Groaned 167 Times in 154 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    Pretty good analysis. Another anomaly I'd add to the OP is that there are voters out there similar to me. I don't like Trump, I consider him a horse's ass. He tweets and says stupid shit. But I will vote for him for several reasons.

    1. We all know he lies but he also speaks the truth about topics others are unwilling to. E.g. his recent ABC interview with Steph and exploitation of hrc's baggage last campaign.
    2. The Mueller witch hunt.
    3. The Kav hearings.
    4. Dim extremism.
    a. Open borders
    b. Anti first amendment
    c. Green New Deal
    d. Local level accommodation of lawlessness
    e. Endless investigations as an agenda and policy

    I could continue but no time.
    I can see why you re a red. Your BS list is why he will lose, not win. Meueller witch hunt landed on a coven. 5 in jail and 25 more indicted. I am amazed someone is dishonest enough to call it a witch hunt. That says so much about you.
    No Dem is for open borders. How can anyone make that claim? More dishonesty;
    The Kav hearing is a positive for the Dems. He is a real jerk,
    The Repubs investigated Hillary only about 12 times, starting when she was the first lady. that is endless. The Dems just started.
    Typical red ,wrong and has no clue.

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    57,752
    Thanks
    15,784
    Thanked 14,833 Times in 11,130 Posts
    Groans
    621
    Groaned 1,012 Times in 960 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    In all four of those elections that you listed, the winner had more than 270.
    If you can show me precisely where in JD's post there is a reference to the EC and/or 270, then I will retract the following:

    Kill Yourself.
    DRINK MOR KOFFEE


  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    388
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 97 Times in 72 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 37 Times in 32 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    Over 55 percent of voters said they would not vote for Trump. And, at least 2 candidates have said they would run against him. The Republicunt party is ruthless and they will stomp on the reds who want to run.
    Useless poll.

    Wait until you’re given the choice of Coke or Pepsi and see which one the people pick. Theoretical circumstances do not yield hard data. If you were to ask 100 TV viewers if there should be more documentaries on TV, about 80 would say yes. About 8 would actually watch them.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to JPF For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2019)

  16. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    388
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 97 Times in 72 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 37 Times in 32 Posts

    Default

    As a liberal it’s frustrating that the current political vehicle (the Democrats) are so fucking stupid when it comes to nominating a Presidential candidate. It’s really pretty bizarre that that given the problems they had in 2008 with Clinton/Obama and 2016 with Clinton/Sanders; the hard feelings, the lack of momentum a primary winner has, and that, you know…THEY LOST IN 2016, one would think that the DEMS would wise up and stop allocating their delegates using proportional representation. It’s maniacal and confusing. And this is even before you get into the whole Super Delegate fiasco at the Convention which is another ridiculous ball of wax although it is pretty sane by comparison to the fact that you can win a state and only walk away with a handful of delegates more than your opponent.

    BTW: Those who think the national popular vote is a good idea, take a close look at the DNC for an example of how chaotic it can wind up being.

    Anyway, one of these days the DEMS will either run out of bullets or toes. I would hope they would be smarter than this but then again, they are Democrats…it’s too much to hope for.

Similar Threads

  1. Pelosi releases battle plans for how to win in 2020
    By I <3 Hezbollah in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2018, 02:54 PM
  2. Why Trudeau doesnít have the high ground on trade
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-13-2018, 07:53 AM
  3. Biden 2020 - it begins, says CNN
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-29-2017, 05:58 AM
  4. Trump begins the campaign for 2020
    By Amadeus in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-28-2017, 08:02 PM
  5. Do we have any moral high ground over ISIS?
    By Juche105 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2016, 02:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •