When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart

[USFREEDOM911]

34 business and individuals were indicted for crimes related to what's in the Mueller report.

There are also 13 or 14 other current investigations you don't even know about.

So the question is why are you lying?

And not one of them under the charge of "collusion" or "obstruction".

[StoneByStone]

But it ain't going to happen.

I fucking hope it doesn't happen. Trump has the Magic R, anything he does is ok.

[USFREEDOM911]

He won’t answer it lol.

But you want the short answer or the long answer?

Is it just me; but has the Living Victim gone completely postal, as of late??

[domer76]

This is why you goof balls don’t want me to read Mullet’s report lol.

Note that that was something they *concluded* from the principles outlined in DOJ policy.

IOW, that’s Mullet’s interpretation of the policy. So rather than simply saying the evidence was insufficient for ANY charge against Trump, Mullet used DOJ policy as a means to give the impression that he would have concluded Trump’s actions were worthy of indictment.

Except for that darn DOJ policy lol!

Wrong, cunt. I WANT you to read it instead of continually posting out of ignorance. How many times have I provided the site to you illiterate assholes?

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-cont...duced-Size.pdf

Read page 28 below, moron.

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/olc/092473.pdf


You fucking idiots continually use “In Other Words” and miss the mark every time.

Losers.

[Darth Omar]

Is it just me; but has the Living Victim gone completely postal, as of late??

It’s not you lol.

[domer76]

I once tried to learn Russian...gave up the first day. No one can learn Russian. Even the translators are just pretending.

Serious mierda, indeed.

That’s because you’re an illiterate dumbfuck that hasn’t mastered English yet.

[Darth Omar]

Wrong, cunt. I WANT you to read it instead of continually posting out of ignorance. How many times have I provided the site to you illiterate assholes?

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-cont...duced-Size.pdf

Read page 28 below, moron.

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/olc/092473.pdf


You fucking idiots continually use “In Other Words” and miss the mark every time.

Losers.

Always the same thing over and over again lol.

Your second link is about initiating criminal proceedings against a sitting president. Who said anything about that?? For 35 million dollars of tax payer money, all we asked of Mullet was to make a simple yes/no *determination* on Trump’s guilt/innocence in collusion and obstruction.

Can we get our money back?

The day I read the Mullet report I’ll come back here and dissect it for you.

[domer76]

Always the same thing over and over again lol.

Your second link is about initiating criminal proceedings against a sitting president. Who said anything about that?? For 35 million dollars of tax payer money, all we asked of Mullet was to make a simple yes/no *determination* on Trump’s guilt/innocence in collusion and obstruction.

Can we get our money back?

The day I read the Mullet report I’ll come back here and dissect it for you.

You stupid fuck, page 28 doesn't speak to Mueller's "interpretation". It said it in real English.

"However, under our constitutional plan as outlined in Article I, sec. 3, only the Congress by the formal process of impeachment, and not a court by any process should be accorded the power to interrupt the Presidency or oust an incumbent."

And no, illiterate shitstain. That wasn't Mueller's mission.

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...r-special.html

Perhaps, at some time, lazy ass, you'll actually take the time to educated yourself.

Don't lie to us, bitch. You'll neither read it nor dissect it.In the meantime, you're nothing more than another two bit, willfully ignorant dumbshit.

It sure gets tiresome kicking your ass on such a regular basis.

[canceled.2021.2]

“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”

But he indicted NOBODY. NOT ONE PERSON

what does DOJ policy say about the Presidents son asswipe?

NOBODY WAS INDICTED FOR OBSTRUCTION. NOT JUST TRUMP. BUT NOBODY

[domer76]

But he indicted NOBODY. NOT ONE PERSON

what does DOJ policy say about the Presidents son asswipe?

NOBODY WAS INDICTED FOR OBSTRUCTION. NOT JUST TRUMP. BUT NOBODY

Fucking idiot.

34 indictments. How many of Trump's inner circle are now in jail?

Mueller determine there was insufficient proof on Juniors intent.

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller said he considered charging President Donald Trump’s eldest son and other participants in a June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with campaign-finance violations but chose not to because of a high bar to prove they intended to break the law.

"Mueller’s decision not to charge Donald Trump Jr. or anyone else at the gathering, including Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, was based in part on a lack of evidence about their state of mind when they agreed to meet a Kremlin-linked lawyer who promised dirt on Hillary Clinton, the special counsel said in his report released Thursday."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...mueller-report

In other words, Junior was too fucking stupid to realize he was doing something illegal.

[CFM]

Conservatives on these boards are using every rhetorical trick they can to avoid answering for what is spelled out in the Mueller report.

They are arguing the validity of the report itself, the credibility of Mueller, everything except the contents of the actual report.

When you start asking the "why" questions...i.e. why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies? Why did Trump's counsel try to tamper with Flynn? Why did Trump order his son to lie about the June 2016 Trumnp Tower meeting with Russians? Why, why, why...that's when the Conservatives cease defending Trump and start attacking you. Attacking you for asking WHY these people did what they did.

Conservatives have no answer for the "why" because the "why" explains everything.

So that's why none of them want to read the Mueller Report...it answers the "why" and doesn't allow them to falsely equivocate.

No collusion. Why can't you accept the truth and go back to being a good little boy?

[USFREEDOM911]

Fucking idiot.

34 indictments. How many of Trump's inner circle are now in jail?

Mueller determine there was insufficient proof on Juniors intent.

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller said he considered charging President Donald Trump’s eldest son and other participants in a June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with campaign-finance violations but chose not to because of a high bar to prove they intended to break the law.

"Mueller’s decision not to charge Donald Trump Jr. or anyone else at the gathering, including Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, was based in part on a lack of evidence about their state of mind when they agreed to meet a Kremlin-linked lawyer who promised dirt on Hillary Clinton, the special counsel said in his report released Thursday."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...mueller-report

In other words, Junior was too fucking stupid to realize he was doing something illegal.

How many for "COLLUSION" or "OBSTRUCTION"??

[Darth Omar]

You stupid fuck, page 28 doesn't speak to Mueller's "interpretation". It said it in real English.

"However, under our constitutional plan as outlined in Article I, sec. 3, only the Congress by the formal process of impeachment, and not a court by any process should be accorded the power to interrupt the Presidency or oust an incumbent."

And no, illiterate shitstain. That wasn't Mueller's mission.

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...r-special.html

Perhaps, at some time, lazy ass, you'll actually take the time to educated yourself.

Don't lie to us, bitch. You'll neither read it nor dissect it.In the meantime, you're nothing more than another two bit, willfully ignorant dumbshit.

It sure gets tiresome kicking your ass on such a regular basis.

Coming to a simple yes/no determination on obstruction or collusion is ‘ousting a president’ lol?

Read it again, slower this time.

[Truth Detector]

No way. Just because Trump colluded, doesn't mean his win is illegitimate. What are we, some kind of republic or something?

Trump didn't collude and no conspiracy. Why do you keep lying?

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

[Truth Detector]

That’s because you’re an illiterate dumbfuck that hasn’t mastered English yet.