Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Superfreak

No he is not. I did no such thing.

Yes he is, and yes you did. Read your post

Had Mueller said "after compiling the evidence, we have concluded there is enough to warrant indictment. Due to DoJ ruling, the indictment will happen when Trump leaves office".

Mueller is a Republican, and a consummate professional. He made it clear that Congress should be the entity to bring trump to justice, as POTUS is above the law. He isn't above impeachment, however.

No politician could ignore the need for impeachment had Mueller done that.

No politician is ignoring it. This is a political calculation, and nothing else. The voters will impeach trump in '20.

You are also wrong on the AG pick. Holder stated clealy he was Obama's guy. Presidents consistently pick AG's that agree with them

Post the quote where Obama said that he needs a 'Roy Cohn', or anyone to protect him from his myriad crimes. We'll wait for you to find it.

**Earl** · 06-14-2019, 03:11 PM

New American:

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month-long investigation of alleged Russian collusion and interference in the 2016 election is summarized in a 448-page report released (in redacted form) Thursday. The wait is over; now the frenzy begins. Enemies of President Trump have claimed — since before he was even elected — that he colluded with Russia. The report, however, makes clear that there is no evidence of those claims. And it fails to provide sufficient evidence of obstruction."

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...of-obstruction

**Superfreak** · 06-14-2019, 03:15 PM

Originally Posted by Althea

Yes he is, and yes you did. Read your post
Mueller is a Republican, and a consummate professional. He made it clear that Congress should be the entity to bring trump to justice, as POTUS is above the law. He isn't above impeachment, however.

No politician is ignoring it. This is a political calculation, and nothing else. The voters will impeach trump in '20.

Post the quote where Obama said that he needs a 'Roy Cohn', or anyone to protect him from his myriad crimes. We'll wait for you to find it.

No. Potus is not. Is the process different? Yes. But not above the law.

No, Mueller did no such thing. He reached a definitive conclusion on conspiring... Evidence did not support indicting anyone in the Trump campaign. On obstruction he was vague. He knows there isn't enough evidence to indict, so he came up with his nonsense and is now trying to tell Congress to do his job.

**Superfreak** · 06-14-2019, 03:16 PM

Mueller is not a professional. A prosecutor dues not say "i couldn't find enough evidence to prove the suspect is innocent". That is pure crap on his part.

**domer76** · 06-14-2019, 03:22 PM

Originally Posted by Superfreak

Mueller is not a professional. A prosecutor dues not say "i couldn't find enough evidence to prove the suspect is innocent". That is pure crap on his part.

He wasn't acting in a prosecutorial role with Trump. He made that clear in his report and his public address.

You are both willfully ignorant and a liar.

Asswipe loser.

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by Superfreak

No. Potus is not. Is the process different? Yes. But not above the law.

No, Mueller did no such thing. He reached a definitive conclusion on conspiring... Evidence did not support indicting anyone in the Trump campaign. On obstruction he was vague. He knows there isn't enough evidence to indict, so he came up with his nonsense and is now trying to tell Congress to do his job.

That's just silly. POTUS cannot be indicted when the Justice Dept. is his personal law firm. POTUS is above the law. Just ask Barr.

Mueller was clear. The campaign conspired with Russia, but POTUS is above the law. Obstruction was clear, and he will face prosecution for same in '21.

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

He wasn't acting in a prosecutorial role with Trump. He made that clear in his report and his public address.

You are both willfully ignorant and a liar.

Asswipe loser.

Yep. Claimed to have read the report. I think he has Barr's version on an audio book in his car.

**Darth Omar** · 06-14-2019, 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by Althea

That's just silly. POTUS cannot be indicted when the Justice Dept. is his personal law firm. POTUS is above the law. Just ask Barr.

Mueller was clear. The campaign conspired with Russia, but POTUS is above the law. Obstruction was clear, and he will face prosecution for same in '21.

Why wasn’t a single Russian conspiracy indictment handed out to someone besides Trump?

I’ll at least entertain the argument that Trump is not not guilty of obstruction. Collusion is just too much to take.

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Why wasn’t a single Russian conspiracy indictment handed out to someone besides Trump?

I’ll at least entertain the argument that Trump is not not guilty of obstruction. Collusion is just too much to take.

Read the report

**Darth Omar** · 06-14-2019, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by Althea

Read the report

Enough of that dodge lol.

Why wasn’t a single indictment naming, someone besides Trump, handed out for conspiring with Russians to affect the election?

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 05:24 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Enough of that dodge lol.

Why wasn’t a single indictment naming, someone besides Trump, handed out for conspiring with Russians to affect the election?

It's in the report. Why are you so lazy?

Or are you waiting for Hannity to finally discuss it?

Don't hold your breath.

**Darth Omar** · 06-14-2019, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by Althea

It's in the report. Why are you so lazy?

Or are you waiting for Hannity to finally discuss it?

Don't hold your breath.

Ok, what’s the explanation ‘in the report’ for Mullet not handing out a single collusion-related indictment to someone besides Trump lol?

It’s highly doubtful Trump could have colluded without some help.

**reagansghost** · 06-14-2019, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Ok, what’s the explanation ‘in the report’ for Mullet not handing out a single collusion-related indictment to someone besides Trump lol?

collusion is not a crime numbskull

Mueller clearly said he couldn't find evidence team Trump sought the Hillary dirt, but did receive it

he could not exonerate Trump for obstruction, left that for the House to impeach

last time I'm explaining this

why are you so stupid?

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 07:02 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Ok, what’s the explanation ‘in the report’ for Mullet not handing out a single collusion-related indictment to someone besides Trump lol?

It’s highly doubtful Trump could have colluded without some help.

Stop being so lazy. Read the report instead of dragging Hannity's talking points here.

Stop littering the board.

**Althea** · 06-14-2019, 07:04 PM

Originally Posted by reagansghost

collusion is not a crime numbskull

Mueller clearly said he couldn't find evidence team Trump sought the Hillary dirt, but did receive it

he could not exonerate Trump for obstruction, left that for the House to impeach

last time I'm explaining this

why are you so stupid?

Because he relies on Faux News conspiracy theories for his 'facts'.