Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

**Southern Chicken** · 06-13-2019, 05:08 PM

Originally Posted by Superfreak

Wrong. They could have and didn't. The DoJ letter ruling would only delay the indictment, not eliminate it's possibility.

Port tack is a waste of time for intellectual conversation.

**Superfreak** · 06-13-2019, 05:08 PM

Originally Posted by Port Tack

He has the evidence and gave it to congress, it's their responsibility.

While Congress can certainly act with impeachment proceedings, he could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. But he didn't. He concluded there wasn't enough evidence to indict any Trump campaign member with conspiracy/coordination. He could have easily stated a conclusion on obstruction as well if he wanted. But he didn't. He punted. Which left the decision to his boss... The AG.

Again, Barrs decision does not alter the ability of Congress to go the route of impeachment.

**Earl** · 06-13-2019, 05:09 PM

New American:

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month-long investigation of alleged Russian collusion and interference in the 2016 election is summarized in a 448-page report released (in redacted form) Thursday. The wait is over; now the frenzy begins. Enemies of President Trump have claimed — since before he was even elected — that he colluded with Russia. The report, however, makes clear that there is no evidence of those claims. And it fails to provide sufficient evidence of obstruction."

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...of-obstruction

I will continue to answer redundant posts by the loons on the left...with redundancy.

**Superfreak** · 06-13-2019, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Port Tack

The DoJ cannot indict the president either. It is up to the house to indict and bring charges.

Again, wrong. They have chosen to delay any indictments of the President until after they are out of office.

**Earl** · 06-13-2019, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Chicken

Port tack is a waste of time for intellectual conversation.

Indeed, a colossal waste of time.

**Micawber** · 06-13-2019, 05:12 PM

He is not cleared: Fact
He is still being investigated by Congress: Fact
If the House feels like they want to impeach him, it can: Fact

There isn't a fucking thing you trumptard traitors and your troll posting can do about any of it.

**Port Tack** · 06-13-2019, 05:12 PM

Originally Posted by Superfreak

Wrong. They could have and didn't. The DoJ letter ruling would only delay the indictment, not eliminate it's possibility.

Mueller could not indict and if you are talking about the house they haven't yet, not "didn't". I don't give a shit if they do. He's a spectacular poster boy for the republicans. Let's keep the criminal in the news until the next election. Hell, polls in Texas say if he goes against Biden he will lose that state. He damn sure won't win any of the states in the rust belt like he did last time, the guys a fucking idiot as are those who support him.

**Port Tack** · 06-13-2019, 05:16 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Chicken

Mueller didn't give his report to congress. He gave it to the Attorney General. The Attorney General explains it to congress

The congress now has the report and they don't give a flying fuck about the AG's explanation, hell, he is being held in contempt of congress as it is now.

**Port Tack** · 06-13-2019, 05:17 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Chicken

Port tack is a waste of time for intellectual conversation.

I certainly would hope a dumbfuck such as yourself would think that.

**Port Tack** · 06-13-2019, 05:18 PM

Originally Posted by Earl

Indeed, a colossal waste of time.

Because he isn't stupid enough to entertain dumbfucks such as yourself?

**domer76** · 06-13-2019, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

And nine out of ten juries would have thrown the indictment out.

Funny, a 1000 former federal prosecutors say otherwise.

**domer76** · 06-13-2019, 05:20 PM

Originally Posted by Southern Chicken

Port tack is a waste of time for intellectual conversation.

You can’t cut that irony with a chain saw!

**Southern Chicken** · 06-13-2019, 05:23 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

Funny, a 1000 former federal prosecutors say otherwise.

Did any of those 1000 former prosecutor have direct access to review the case? No they didn't. They even signed the petition as we believe. They didn't state they knew the case directly.

**Micawber** · 06-13-2019, 05:24 PM

The only interesting question is whether, if nothing new comes about (through further investigation or impeachment proceedings
altering the Republican rank in file consciousness, and after Trump loses in a massive electoral and popular landslide election to whomsoever
the wildly unpopular and hated PIG goes up against), will he be immediately indicted or not.

I consider all events within above parenthetical fait accompli.

**Southern Chicken** · 06-13-2019, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Port Tack

The congress now has the report and they don't give a flying fuck about the AG's explanation, hell, he is being held in contempt of congress as it is now.

Then why is there only 14% members of the house supports impeachment?