Page 20 of 25 FirstFirst ... 10161718192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 369

Thread: Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

  1. #286 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    30,769
    Thanks
    6,176
    Thanked 8,048 Times in 6,060 Posts
    Groans
    25
    Groaned 1,478 Times in 1,417 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    Did any of those 1000 former prosecutor have direct access to review the case? No they didn't. They even signed the petition as we believe. They didn't state they knew the case directly.
    There’s plenty in the redacted report, you fucking moron.

    You know, the one you idiots HAVEN’T read.

    https://www.newsweek.com/former-fede...sident-1439716

    Loser

  2. #287 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    881
    Thanks
    184
    Thanked 244 Times in 202 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    You can’t cut that irony with a chain saw!
    How is hoong?

  3. #288 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    14,826
    Thanks
    2,014
    Thanked 6,396 Times in 4,417 Posts
    Groans
    87
    Groaned 940 Times in 881 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.

    Mueller report ^

  4. #289 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    30,769
    Thanks
    6,176
    Thanked 8,048 Times in 6,060 Posts
    Groans
    25
    Groaned 1,478 Times in 1,417 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    How is hoong?
    ^”Intellectual” anything with you, halfwit, is an oxymoron.

  5. #290 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,529
    Thanks
    5,332
    Thanked 6,682 Times in 4,628 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 536 Times in 511 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    I have. It isn't in there. So you can either back your claim by citing page and paragraph or you can admit you were wrong
    Sorry. You didn't read it. When you do, get back to us.

    Or...you did read it, and you're lying again. It's 50/50 which of the above options it is.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  6. #291 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    14,826
    Thanks
    2,014
    Thanked 6,396 Times in 4,417 Posts
    Groans
    87
    Groaned 940 Times in 881 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    How is hoong?
    What is hoong

  7. #292 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,529
    Thanks
    5,332
    Thanked 6,682 Times in 4,628 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 536 Times in 511 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    No individual is above the law. Not even the President. The DoJ may delay the indictment, but that is all
    LMAO. When the DOJ is acting as the president's personal legal team, POTUS is above the law. Why do you think he hand picked the moron who applied for the job via a dissertation re. POTUS' immunity from prosecution?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  8. #293 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    881
    Thanks
    184
    Thanked 244 Times in 202 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    What is hoong
    Just a friend of domer. Isn't that right, domer? He made a recent ode to hoong on one of his post. It was beautiful.
    America land of freedom

    We have a clown congressman in the House eating KFC at a hearing


  9. #294 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    881
    Thanks
    184
    Thanked 244 Times in 202 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    ^”Intellectual” anything with you, halfwit, is an oxymoron.
    And you're the expert? Lol , too funny

  10. #295 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    14,826
    Thanks
    2,014
    Thanked 6,396 Times in 4,417 Posts
    Groans
    87
    Groaned 940 Times in 881 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    Just a friend of domer. Isn't that right, domer? He made a recent ode to hoong on one of his post. It was beautiful.
    price of rice in china stuff then

  11. #296 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    25,174
    Thanks
    6,271
    Thanked 13,849 Times in 9,607 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 896 Times in 858 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Funny, a 1000 former federal prosecutors say otherwise.
    How many of them are rushing to court with their Ďindictmentsí lol?
    Iím a straight white cisgender Easter worshipper~how else may I offend you?

  12. #297 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    38,578
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Post Smack View Post
    Thats because this was the president and he can't indict him, if he could have he would have.
    So you say.

    What was the purpose of the 18 month and $20 + million witch hunt?

  13. #298 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,344
    Thanks
    3,580
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 2,452 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 737 Times in 668 Posts

    Default

    Hello Darth,

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    But thatís kind of it lol.

    Itís a policy and itís open to interpretation. The reason presidents should be immune from indictment is because state Attorneys General could file bogus indictments against a president for partisan reasons. So rather than opening that Pandoras Box it was decided presidents should be immune from indictmentsówhile serving. Makes perfect sense and itís a good rule.

    Sadly, presidents arenít immune from partisan Witch Hunts.

    At any rate, note that says *nothing* about presidents being immune from criminal conclusions or determinations that arise out of investigations. A conclusion is not an indictment. Mullet is totally on his own with that one. There is NO reason Mullet couldnít have concluded Trumpís actions were worthy of indictment and then *plainly stated* it as such.

    But he left us this Mumbo-jumbo about Trump being not not guilty of obstruction. I challenge anyone to cite another single instance where a federal prosecutor ended with such an absurd proclamation. And along with it, the so-called ten instances of obstruction which are actually ten potential instances of obstruction.

    Itís very easy to get the idea it was done in order to give House Democrats something to work with. In fact, thatís the most plausible explanation for the contortions.
    Yeah, but the suspicious right biased view is not the only perspective in the situation.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Flame on me, mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you go on my PERMANENT Ignore List. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I won't participate in your threads, you will be banned from mine. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: if you like my PIP, feel free to use it. It works well.

  14. #299 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    38,578
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    How many of them are rushing to court with their ‘indictments’ lol?
    None, lol.

  15. #300 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    38,578
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Post Smack View Post
    Hell, polls in Texas say if he goes against Biden he will lose that state. He damn sure won't win any of the states in the rust belt like he did last time, the guys a fucking idiot as are those who support him.
    Polls.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-21-2019, 05:44 AM
  2. Trump: Its fake news.... Mueller report.... Nope.
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 229
    Last Post: 04-19-2019, 10:09 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2019, 09:06 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-21-2019, 09:07 AM
  5. Mueller to Clear Trump
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 03-26-2018, 09:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •