I like soldiers that DON'T get their eye hit with shrapnel.
FAILING NYT "REPORTER" CAUGHT LYING
I like soldiers that DON'T get their eye hit with shrapnel.
StoneByStone (06-12-2019)
Because you say so or a Twitter response says so? NO LINK for either of you.
Bottom line, why if the funding was in place did these guys have to show up and ask for it? Seems like they would have better things to do than hop in cars or Amtrak trains and ride to DC with Jon Stewart. Train fare what $60 each way from NYC or Jersey? What don't WE know about this subject?
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
Earl (06-16-2019)
Phony patriotism in the news.
PS I don't know who the ranking member is on this Committee but JIM JORDAN was at the investigation to throw out BS at the Trump Obstruction/Collusion investigation. Yethe wasn't at the 9/11 responder group's and apparently he sits on that committee too...
So it was a notable when just a day later, when his committee held an emotional hearing about getting health care for 9/11 first responders sickened by their exposure to toxic dust and chemicals at Ground Zero, Jordan was nowhere to be found:
Swing LeftWhen it came time to discuss a concrete issue that had nothing to do with Trump investigations, House Democrats were there — and Jordan, for all his bluster, was not.
✔@swingleft
Yesterday Jim Jordan lambasted House Democrats and questioned their priorities.
Today he skipped his committee’s hearing on helping 9/11 victims.
ABC News Politics
✔@ABCPolitics
"Your indifference cost these men and women their most valuable commodity: time."
Jon Stewart receives a standing ovation from 9/11 first responders after slamming lawmakers for failing to fund programs providing healthcare to the first responders https://abcn.ws/2Tk3IrO
2,498
Twitter Ads info and privacy
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/rep...no-priorities/
Last edited by Centerleftfl; 06-12-2019 at 03:07 PM.
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
JEW-HATING MUSLIM IS A BIGAMIST AND TAX CHEAT
Last week, we were given the news that Ilhan Omar had committed campaign finance violations.
It took an announcement by Minnesota campaign finance officials to finally get a few mainstream outlets to notice.
Then things got worse, as it became clear that part of the entire scheme involved her filing joint tax returns with someone she wasn’t married to, all while simultaneously being married to another man.
The Associated Press did finally put out a story on the ordeal, but decided to use it’s position to shill for Omar.
Instead of an investigative piece on her wrongdoing, they found an “expert” to do a Q&A assuring everyone that Omar is in the clear.
Despite the mainstream press’ desire to bury this story, Omar’s hometown paper has a bit of a harsher (but not too harsh) take. While they are extremely pro-DEMOCRAT, the Star Tribune’s editorial board took the Congresswoman to task: It’s against the law in Minnesota to file jointly unless one filer is legally married to the other. Last year Omar told the Star Tribune that she had married her partner “in her faith,” and had earlier divorced her first husband “in her faith.” That’s fine for religious purposes. But for tax purposes, only civil marriages qualify. It’s not known whether she benefited materially by filing jointly. That is something that voters, who are obliged to follow tax laws no matter how painful, are entitled to know.
Omar’s excuse has been to say she was divorced and remarried in her “faith.” The IRS doesn’t care about that.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/06/12/ap-goes-bat-ilhan-omar-scandals-widen/
A new study by cybersecurity company Symantec made waves last week with a new study claiming that Russia’s activities on Twitter in the run-up to the 2016 election.
The study concluded that Russia’s Internet Research Agency (IRA) funded by Russian operative Yevgeny Prigozhin had an “incredibly successful” run on Twitter “well in advance” of the 2016 election. But how much bigger? And could the difference have swayed voter decision-making?
Did Putin’s bots really succeed in breaking up U.S. politics as many on the left have implied?
Symantec found that tweets from IRA accounts shared links from popular news websites such as NBC, a San Francisco news site called Kron4, The Seattle Times, CBS and more.
Journalist Tim Pool, who has spoken extensively on the issue of Russian activity on social media, said, “Many activist groups and special interests do share real news in an effort to surface certain conversations. NBC previously reported that Russia is trying to foment racial animosity so by sharing certain stories, on say police brutality, they can push divisive conversations to the forefront and cause problems for the U.S.”
It is impossible to say that such a phenomenon influenced voter decisions in 2016.
What is perhaps equally concerning is the fact that the Russians profited off their fake accounts and interactions on social media. Symantec found that at least one of the 3,836 Russian accounts made a “substantial income” through a monetization website called Shorte.st, which claims that its users can earn up to $14 for shortening links through their application, so as long as it gets at least 1,000 clicks.
So while attempting to further divide Americans by promoting tweets specific to both left and right-wing ideologies, Russian operatives were also profiting off their most successful social media posts.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/14/syamntec-twitter-2016-election/
Fox numbers are misleading, first, it is the same people watching, nobody turns on Fox for news, all they are doing is preaching to the choir, and secondly, they are pale in comparison to all three network news broadcasts
And beyond belief is that you would use Breitfart compiled statistics as evidence and commentary, might as well have employed the Onion for the same
Bookmarks