16,000 people in L.A. now live in cars, vans and RVs. ,Tar Oozes From Ground Into LA

[Sailor]

Coincidence? I think not. Prove me wrong.

16,000 people in L.A. now live in cars, vans and RVs. But safe parking remains elusive https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...610-story.html


Tar, Natural Gas Rises Up Onto Streets Near La Brea Tar Pits https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2019...brea-tar-pits/

[reagansghost]

650,000 people live in Oklahoma City

they're far worse off for sure

[Sailor]

650,000 people live in Oklahoma City

they're far worse off for sure

How many homeless? What tar is oozing from their soil? Be specific now.

[reagansghost]

How many homeless? What tar is oozing from their soil? Be specific now.

most people would much rather be homeless in LA than live in the OKC

fact

[Sailor]

most people would much rather be homeless in LA than live in the OKC

fact

Feel feel to prove that. It would be the first time you could do it.

[reagansghost]

Feel feel to prove that. It would be the first time you could do it.

have you ever been to the OKC?

I rest my case

[Eagle_Eye]

Feel feel to prove that. It would be the first time you could do it.

He is correct if he is talking about Hispanics. Whites make up 28.4%, Blacks 8.6%, Hispanics 48.7% Yea those illegals love LA.

[PostmodernProphet]

most people would much rather be homeless in LA than live in the OKC

fact

only the most incredibly stupid people would rather be homeless anywhere......

[Oneuli]

650,000 people live in Oklahoma City

they're far worse off for sure

That's the thing. Conservatives like to obsess about the problems of cities in liberal areas. But if you judge by the bottom line --by how much people are willing to spend for the privilege of living in an area-- even the worst of the "liberal cities" are viewed as better than the conservative alternatives (urban or rural). When people jabber on the Internet, they're free to make up any old nonsense. But when people have to put their money where their mouths are, you get a sense for what they really think. And they generally think that living in liberal areas is worth paying a premium.

[Sailor]

That's the thing. Conservatives like to obsess about the problems of cities in liberal areas. But if you judge by the bottom line --by how much people are willing to spend for the privilege of living in an area-- even the worst of the "liberal cities" are viewed as better than the conservative alternatives (urban or rural). When people jabber on the Internet, they're free to make up any old nonsense. But when people have to put their money where their mouths are, you get a sense for what they really think. And they generally think that living in liberal areas is worth paying a premium.

And in liberal Democrat cities, it is all about the free shit.

[Oneuli]

And in liberal Democrat cities, it is all about the free shit.

Generally speaking, the flow of funds in the US is from high-earning areas to low-earning ones, especially to highly subsidized areas (e.g., farming communities and places that suck heavily on the federal teat for their military bases, retiree living expenses, and disaster relief). So, the "free shit" is more of a conservative-area thing.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

Of the ten states with the highest dependency on that list, nine were Trump states, while the highly urbanized and liberal states, like New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and California, tend to have below-median dependency.

[Sailor]

Generally speaking, the flow of funds in the US is from high-earning areas to low-earning ones, especially to highly subsidized areas (e.g., farming communities). So, the "free shit" is more of a conservative-area thing.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

Of the ten states with the highest dependency on that list, nine were Trump states, while the highly urbanized and liberal states, like New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and California, how below-median dependency.

Who has the most homeless.

[Truth Detector]

Generally speaking, the flow of funds in the US is from high-earning areas to low-earning ones, especially to highly subsidized areas (e.g., farming communities and places that suck heavily on the federal teat for their military bases, retiree living expenses, and disaster relief). So, the "free shit" is more of a conservative-area thing.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

Of the ten states with the highest dependency on that list, nine were Trump states, while the highly urbanized and liberal states, like New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and California, tend to have below-median dependency.

Another stupid claim from the idiot brigade.

[tinfoil]

Generally speaking, the flow of funds in the US is from high-earning areas to low-earning ones, especially to highly subsidized areas (e.g., farming communities and places that suck heavily on the federal teat for their military bases, retiree living expenses, and disaster relief). So, the "free shit" is more of a conservative-area thing.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

Of the ten states with the highest dependency on that list, nine were Trump states, while the highly urbanized and liberal states, like New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and California, tend to have below-median dependency.

You are a weak debater. WTF? LOL do you ever stay on point?

[countryboy]

And in liberal Democrat cities, it is all about the free shit.

Literally, not figuratively.