Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

no. its because she knows americans love trump and impeachment would backfire.

[Truth Detector]

Why?

Because.

The idea that an impeachment would turn out for the Democrats as it did the GOP back with Clinton isn't applicable, Americans liked Clinton, look at his approval ratings before and after the impeachment, Americans don't approve of Trump, big difference

That's a fascinating, yet stupid claim snowflake. If this is so obvious, why are the majority of Democrats in the House not for impeachment? The only one's wanting it are a shrill, low IQ minority....kind of like you.

And currently impeachment only has the support of forty some House Democrats, how in the hell is that a Civil War?

Gosh, THINK snowflake THINK! We are talking about the constituents. So if only 25% of Democrats support impeachment, why does it appear as a major issue in the media?

You got to keep up with events "earl" if you want to post

That's a rather ironic coming from a clueless dullard like you.

[archives]

The house is legislating.

Obama did all the dividing snowflake. If you had opened your eyes over the last decade you could have comprehended the OBVIOUS. The repulsive name calling attacks is all the making of you clueless morons on the left who think they are entitled to political power.

Grow a brain; now I predict your response will start with crying and looking like Ralphy when he gets beat up.

Fucking cretin can't spell or think.

Wrong again "truthie," shocking

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bil...entatives/5947

And the only dividing Obama created was being the first black man elected President, a fact individuals as yourself just couldn't accept, and if you think a President calling large segments of the citizenry "traitors" and "enemies" is copacetic then you are way too drunk on the Kool Aid to ever get it

[Earl]

Nancy (the wicked witch of the West), is between a rock and a hard place.

If she impeaches, the radical Democrat Socialists will suffer a defeat at the polls in 2020 of Biblical proportions.

If she doesn't impeach, the radical Democrat Socialists will have a civil war of Biblical proportions,

[Earl]

Vox:

“Pursuing articles of impeachment against Trump would be politically explosive. Democrats know the Republican-led Senate under Mitch McConnell won’t take the next step after impeachment — a trial in the Senate — and they doubt the public would support them. In March, just 36 percent of voters polled by CNN supported impeachment. That number has risen in subsequent months, with 45 percent of the public supporting impeachment, per a May Reuters/Ipsos poll. But it’s still an incredibly divisive topic, and one Pelosi would only entertain if she knew the vast majority of Americans, including Republicans, were on board.”

The vast majority of Republicans are not on board...especially the Senate and Sen. McConnell- “case closed.”

[domer76]

no. its because she knows americans love trump and impeachment would backfire.

Yeah, all 41%. 54% thinks he's an incompetent asshole.

[archives]

Because.



That's a fascinating, yet stupid claim snowflake. If this is so obvious, why are the majority of Democrats in the House not for impeachment? The only one's wanting it are a shrill, low IQ minority....kind of like you.



Gosh, THINK snowflake THINK! We are talking about the constituents. So if only 25% of Democrats support impeachment, why does it appear as a major issue in the media?



That's a rather ironic coming from a clueless dullard like you.

Second attempt by the "truthie" and he is equally as wrong

"Why?" And his retraction, "because," alright, just about says it all

Nothing regarding the difference between now and Clinton's impeachment, not suprising, and as I showed "earl," the majority of Democrats aren't in favor of impeachment, in fact, those talking it up big are some Presidential candidates out to win a primary and cable infotainment, in particularly Fox as part of the orchestrated design to keep lemming as you and "earl" fired up

And if you are going to attempt a rebutal, bring something more than talk radio rhetoric and the personal crapola

(time for a corny copy and paste picture)

[Earl]

Nancy (the wicked witch of the West), is between a rock and a hard place.

If she impeaches, the radical Democrat Socialists will suffer a defeat at the polls in 2020 of Biblical proportions.

If she doesn't impeach, the radical Democrat Socialists will have a civil war of Biblical proportions,

[domer76]

Vox:

“Pursuing articles of impeachment against Trump would be politically explosive. Democrats know the Republican-led Senate under Mitch McConnell won’t take the next step after impeachment — a trial in the Senate — and they doubt the public would support them. In March, just 36 percent of voters polled by CNN supported impeachment. That number has risen in subsequent months, with 45 percent of the public supporting impeachment, per a May Reuters/Ipsos poll. But it’s still an incredibly divisive topic, and one Pelosi would only entertain if she knew the vast majority of Americans, including Republicans, were on board.”

The vast majority of Republicans are not on board...especially the Senate and Sen. McConnell- “case closed.”

The vast majority of Republicans are gullible fools. The Senate Republicans are cowards.

Let's get those hearings started without any more Trump obstruction. Let's see those financial records and get the real truth out to the public regarding the Mueller report.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

When you cover your eyes with your hands, poopiehead, do you think no one will be able to see you?

I'm just curious, because you seem to think if you keep repeating the same lies over and over it will eventually make them true.

[archives]

Vox:

“Pursuing articles of impeachment against Trump would be politically explosive. Democrats know the Republican-led Senate under Mitch McConnell won’t take the next step after impeachment — a trial in the Senate — and they doubt the public would support them. In March, just 36 percent of voters polled by CNN supported impeachment. That number has risen in subsequent months, with 45 percent of the public supporting impeachment, per a May Reuters/Ipsos poll. But it’s still an incredibly divisive topic, and one Pelosi would only entertain if she knew the vast majority of Americans, including Republicans, were on board.”

The vast majority of Republicans are not on board...especially the Senate and Sen. McConnell- “case closed.”

Says nothing regarding the earlier point you were attempting to make that Pelosi is "inbetween a rock ............"

Don't know how many times it has to be explained until lemmings as yourself understand it, but they know fully well that Mitch is going kill any impeachment trial in the Senate. If Trump did shoot someone on 5th Ave Mitch would kill any impeachment trial in the Senate

It is the process those Democrats calling for impeachment want, they want the nation to be glued to their TV sets watching the likes of Junior or Jared under fire explain the hundreds of contacts between themselves and Russians, they want a full exposure of Trump's businesses and now they are entangled with his role as President rationalized infront of cameras by Trump employees. It is the process more so than the results

[Earl]

Vox:

“Pursuing articles of impeachment against Trump would be politically explosive. Democrats know the Republican-led Senate under Mitch McConnell won’t take the next step after impeachment — a trial in the Senate — and they doubt the public would support them. In March, just 36 percent of voters polled by CNN supported impeachment. That number has risen in subsequent months, with 45 percent of the public supporting impeachment, per a May Reuters/Ipsos poll. But it’s still an incredibly divisive topic, and one Pelosi would only entertain if she knew the vast majority of Americans, including Republicans, were on board.”

The vast majority of Republicans are not on board...especially the Senate and Sen. McConnell- “case closed.”

I’ll understand if you don’t understand.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Yeah, all 41%. 54% thinks he's an incompetent asshole.

are those the same pollsters who predicted a hillary victory?

[anonymoose]

YAWN! Okay, let's try this again; what would he go to jail for?

Collusion. Hope Hicks has all the goods on Trump.

[Truth Detector]

Wrong again "truthie," shocking
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bil...entatives/5947

Do you read your own links snowflake? You are the definition of wrong. How many pieces of legislation have passed JUST the House since they were in session?

And the only dividing Obama created was being the first black man elected President, a fact individuals as yourself just couldn't accept, and if you think a President calling large segments of the citizenry "traitors" and "enemies" is copacetic then you are way too drunk on the Kool Aid to ever get it

There you go again sad sack; with the lies and race hustling. But again you are wrong as always. Obama did that dividing, not because he was half black, but because of his disdain for anyone who disagreed with him. He hated Middle America calling them bitter, clinging to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

He was a narcissistic gasbag who didn't have the slightest clue how to run anything and was the most inexperienced person to ever take the job....he admitted that much.

He was the first POTUS to declare in his SOTU that he would act WITHOUT congress; and dishonest whiny, small minded morons like you cheered.

So please, STFU when it is obvious you don't have the slightest clue of what you are emoting about. It is obvious you can't think for yourself. Your only skill is parroting the moronic nonsense you are spoon fed by the media.

Let's take another look at some of your dumb predictions:

QUOTE=archives; Mueller is not going to lose, at best, hung jury, meaning they do it all over again, but you are right, for eight months the right wing media has been bombarding Trump's line that Manafort had nothing to do with the campaign, but if he is somehow found not guilty, they will be shouting that it proves Trump is off the hook and it all is a witch hunt
Just shows they are reaching for straws

QUOTE=archives; I don't think so, I'd estimate at least another year, he will purposely conclude well out from the 2020 election
Irony is even when Mueller concludes that won't be the end of it, especially if the Democrats take the House in November 09/18/18

QUOTE=archives; Ain't happening, any astute individual isn't buying it nor the right wing media's attempt now to sell it, as I've noted earlier, it is only the beginning innings, BenghaziGate took six years, and this is the Democrats' BenghaziGate 04/18/19[i]