Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, CharacterAssassin and reagansghost |
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Because he wouldn't indict a sitting president, he said it would be unconstitutional.
Do you understand this sentence: "If we had confidence that the president had clearly not committed a crime we would have said so...”
It can be read as "if the president had clearly not committed a crime, we would have said so.
IOW it's not clear that he didn't commit a crime.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
THE most significant thing he said: "...if (IF) we had had confidence that the president clearly DID NOT commit a crime, we would have said so. (caps added to reflect his emphasis) ...under long-standing department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office....Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...RqhgE-2kTypf4c
"The attorney general then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and to the American people. At one point in time, I requested that certain portions of the report be released and the attorney general preferred to make — preferred to make the entire report public all at once and we appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. And I certainly do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision."
From the horse's mouth this morning. Anything about lying or misrepresenting the report? Nope, there is no such thing outside the fevered anti-Trump mind.
The anti-Trumper's new mantra:
“B-b-but muh White supremacy”
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
jimmymccready (05-29-2019)
jimmymccready (05-29-2019)
"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime,
we would have said so," Mueller announced. He once again pointed to inconclusive evidence.
They did not have that confidence. They did not have that evidence to indict.
Therefore, if Mullet DID conclude he committed a crime, he would indict. Oh wait......he did NOT indict.
There was no confidence that he committed any crime.
Last edited by Stretch; 05-29-2019 at 04:02 PM.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
jimmymccready (05-29-2019)
How many of Mullet’s witnesses are they going to recall just to see if Trump obstructed an investigation that produced no crime?
And no one knows whether or not it’s unconstitutional to indict a sitting president—because no one ever has. It’s some people’s *opinion* that you can’t indict a president. If Mullet felt strongly that Trump was guilty of a crime [that would not exist but for the investigation, itself] he should have indicted him and allowed SCOTUS to determine the constitutional question. That’s the whole point to having the Supreme Court.
Mullet is either spineless or he had nothing. Pick one.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
One of the things that is relevant in the world of dumb f**ks is that one be able to ignore reality, and facts. That is how he draft dodging lying coward go as many votes as he did. He relied on the ignorance of the American voter just as he is not with the Mueller Report, and his authorizing of his lapdog Barr to investigate anyone that opposes him.
If you had honestly read the article, and God knows you doing anything honestly strains ones credulity, you would have seen this, and understood it:
"In his first and only public address about his 22-month-long Russia investigation, Mueller said: "As set forth in the report after that investigation,
if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said so."
Citing long-standing Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel policy, Mueller said he never considered charging a sitting president with a crime and noted that doing so would be unconstitutional.
"The special counsel's office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider," he said. "The department's written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation."
Although Mueller declined to make a decision on obstruction, despite laying out 10 possible scenarios in his report, Barr said he and former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish a crime." (That was a lie)
But even after all of that you had to edit the article to suit your own lies, and mental illness. The article itself says:
"if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said so."
But you in your state of lack of integrity posted this:
"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime, we would have said so,"
Even your grammar is like that of a dumb f**k.
Trump committed crimes. Mueller was not allowed to report those crimes.
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Trumpsplainin going on
christiefan915 (05-29-2019), jimmymccready (05-29-2019)
Bookmarks