Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction

[Stretch]

Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction, releases document to provide more context
by Jerry Dunleavy
& Daniel Chaitin
| May 29, 2019 02:38 PM
| Updated May 29, 2019, 03:27 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller released a document comparing his assertions about obstruction of justice to what Attorney General William Barr said about it.

Mueller delivered a public address about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, after which some politicians and pundits argued the special counsel contradicted Barr.

Hours later, NBC News obtained a copy of the document and shared it on MSNBC.

"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the attorney general said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.

"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion," she added.

continued at https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-more-context

[Stretch]

"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime,
we would have said so," Mueller announced. He once again pointed to inconclusive evidence.
They did not have that confidence. They did not have that evidence to indict.

Therefore, if Mullet DID conclude he committed a crime, he would indict. Oh wait......he did NOT indict.

[domer76]

"If we had had the confidence that the president had not clearly committed a crime,
we would have said so," Mueller announced. He once again pointed to inconclusive evidence.
They did not have that confidence. They did not have that evidence to indict.

Therefore, if Mullet DID conclude he committed a crime, he would indict. Oh wait......he did NOT indict.

No, illiterate dumbfuck. He did not point to inconclusive evidence. He pointed out 10 instances. That Trump can not be criminally prosecuted does not mean the evidence is inconclusive. How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that indictment was never an option?

What a fucking dense moron. And liar.

[Sailor]

Oh Gomer, you poor little delusional midget.

[|/\/\/\/\/\/\//\|]

Trump can not be criminally prosecuted.

That's right, DEMOCRAT.

Suck it.

Suck it real hard.

Loser.

[Stretch]

Oh Gomer, you poor little delusional midget.

They're burnin' out fast...all dazed and confused. Poor darlins'.

[Sailor]

They're burnin' out fast...all dazed and confused. Poor darlins'.

Worst part for them is the welfare checks are not coming for another week or so. They ran out of diapers......

[Grokmaster]

Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction, releases document to provide more context
by Jerry Dunleavy
& Daniel Chaitin
| May 29, 2019 02:38 PM
| Updated May 29, 2019, 03:27 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller released a document comparing his assertions about obstruction of justice to what Attorney General William Barr said about it.

Mueller delivered a public address about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, after which some politicians and pundits argued the special counsel contradicted Barr.

Hours later, NBC News obtained a copy of the document and shared it on MSNBC.

"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the attorney general said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.

"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion," she added.

continued at https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-more-context

This will be BURIED by the FAKE NEWS, and IGNORED by the LYING LEFT....

[Adolf_Twitler]

They're burnin' out fast...all dazed and confused. Poor darlins'.

You are one lying pussy-stretched bitch! LOL!

They don't call you stretch for nothing!

[LV426]

No, illiterate dumbfuck. He did not point to inconclusive evidence. He pointed out 10 instances. That Trump can not be criminally prosecuted does not mean the evidence is inconclusive. How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that indictment was never an option?

What a fucking dense moron. And liar.

The only reason Mueller didn't bring criminal charges against Trump was because of OLC rules that he lays out in the Executive Summary of Volume II.

Anyone who has read the report will know that.

[Sailor]

You are one lying pussy-stretched bitch! LOL!

They don't call you stretch for nothing!

Another, have respect for women and womens rights Democrat speaks. You just cannot make this shit up.

[domer76]

The only reason Mueller didn't bring criminal charges against Trump was because of OLC rules that he lays out in the Executive Summary of Volume II.

Anyone who has read the report will know that.

Yep

[Stretch]

You are one lying bitch! LOL!

Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction, releases document to provide more context
by Jerry Dunleavy
& Daniel Chaitin
| May 29, 2019 02:38 PM
| Updated May 29, 2019, 03:27 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller released a document comparing his assertions about obstruction of justice to what Attorney General William Barr said about it.

Mueller delivered a public address about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, after which some politicians and pundits argued the special counsel contradicted Barr.

Hours later, NBC News obtained a copy of the document and shared it on MSNBC.

"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the attorney general said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.

"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion," she added.

continued at https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-more-context

[LV426]

Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction, releases document to provide more context
by Jerry Dunleavy
& Daniel Chaitin
| May 29, 2019 02:38 PM
| Updated May 29, 2019, 03:27 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller released a document comparing his assertions about obstruction of justice to what Attorney General William Barr said about it.

Mueller delivered a public address about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, after which some politicians and pundits argued the special counsel contradicted Barr.

Hours later, NBC News obtained a copy of the document and shared it on MSNBC.

"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the attorney general said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.

"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion," she added.

continued at https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-more-context

Have you read the actual document to which they're referring for yourself?

[Truth Detector]

You are I am one lying pussy-stretched bitch! LOL!

They don't call you me stretnch for nothing!

True that.