anatta (05-27-2019), anonymoose (05-28-2019), Stretch (05-27-2019), Truth Detector (05-28-2019), USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
Members banned from this thread: evince |
Told you so, Left Twits; OBAMIDIOT JUDGES, do not get to IGNORE ESTABLISHED JURISPRUDENCE in the interest of the HOUSE DUNCE-O-CRAT WITCH HUNT....a "POSSIBLE, INDEFINITE, MAYBE 'FUTURE' LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE"....is NOT AN EXISTING LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE.
THE DUNCE-O-CRATS are LYING THEIR ASSES OFF about a "legislative purpose", and the OBAMIDIOT JUDGE KNOWINGLY COMPLIED WITH AN ILLEGAL REQUEST, to serve the " GETR TRUMP" agenda, and EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The left thinks they can IGNORE the CONSTITUTION with their "hand-picked judges", like they did for YEARS under the Obama Adm....NOT ANYMORE.
" The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571
Subpoenas for Trump financial records on hold pending appeal: court filing
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp will not have to immediately hand over the financial records of U.S. President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization, according to a court filing on Saturday.
The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers.
A lawyer for the Trumps argued earlier this week that the subpoenas exceeded the authority of Congress and were "the epitome of an inquiry into private or personal matters."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/subpoenas...0--sector.html
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
anatta (05-27-2019), anonymoose (05-28-2019), Stretch (05-27-2019), Truth Detector (05-28-2019), USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
Bad news for demalquedacrats
Grokmaster (05-27-2019), Truth Detector (05-28-2019)
Clause 5: Speaker and other officers; Impeachment
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeac...to_investigate
House of Representatives: Impeachment[edit]
"House Manager" redirects here. For theater operations, see House management.
Impeachment proceedings may be requested by a member of the House of Representatives on his or her own initiative, either by presenting a list of the charges under oath or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be requested by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal judge be impeached, a charge of actions constituting grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutor, the President, or state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by petition. An impeachment proceeding formally begins with a resolution adopted by the full House of Representatives, which typically includes a referral to a House committee.
The type of impeachment resolution determines the committee to which it is referred. A resolution impeaching a particular individual is typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. A resolution to authorize an investigation regarding impeachable conduct is referred to the House Committee on Rules, and then to the Judiciary Committee. The House Committee on the Judiciary, by majority vote, will determine whether grounds for impeachment exist. If the Committee finds grounds for impeachment, it will set forth specific allegations of misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment. The Impeachment Resolution, or Articles of Impeachment, are then reported to the full House with the committee's recommendations.
The House debates the resolution and may at the conclusion consider the resolution as a whole or vote on each article of impeachment individually. A simple majority of those present and voting is required for each article for the resolution as a whole to pass. If the House votes to impeach, managers (typically referred to as "House managers", with a "lead House manager") are selected to present the case to the Senate. Recently, managers have been selected by resolution, while historically the House would occasionally elect the managers or pass a resolution allowing the appointment of managers at the discretion of the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. These managers are roughly the equivalent of the prosecution or district attorney in a standard criminal trial.
Also, the House will adopt a resolution in order to notify the Senate of its action. After receiving the notice, the Senate will adopt an order notifying the House that it is ready to receive the managers. The House managers then appear before the bar of the Senate and exhibit the articles of impeachment. After the reading of the charges, the managers return and make a verbal report to the House.
good. this is pure fishing by Nadler et all
Truth Detector (05-28-2019)
the people don't agree with your lies putins cock holster
USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
The Mueller report shows its perfectly reasonable
USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
About time the LEFTIDIOTS in the Federal Judiciary were CALLED OUT on their blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL rulings to Serve the Agenda by judicial fiat.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Truth Detector (05-28-2019)
Get ready for the DUNCE-O-CRAT 9th Circus judge who just INSERTED HIMSELF INTO EXECUTIVE BRANCH POWERS over PROTECTING THE BORDER, to get the USUAL NINTH CIRCUS SMACKDOWN from the "higher ups"..., as well.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)
Frivilous appeal interposed in bad faith= stall tactic = another count of obstruction of justice and another contempt of citation
Perhaps you should LEARN THE LAW FIRST; CAN't FIGURE OUT WHAT THIS MEANS????
" The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Truth Detector (05-28-2019)
".....The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers."STUPID FUCK;
WASHINGTON — as a federal judge upheld a subpoena for his financial records
DO YOU EVER KNOW WTF YOU ARE BLATHERING ABOUT????
What A LYING ASS FUCKHEAD.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Truth Detector (05-28-2019)
Bookmarks