Members banned from this thread: evince


Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 78

Thread: Subpoenas for Trump financial records on hold pending appeal: court filing

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Subpoenas for Trump financial records on hold pending appeal: court filing

    Told you so, Left Twits; OBAMIDIOT JUDGES, do not get to IGNORE ESTABLISHED JURISPRUDENCE in the interest of the HOUSE DUNCE-O-CRAT WITCH HUNT....a "POSSIBLE, INDEFINITE, MAYBE 'FUTURE' LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE"....is NOT AN EXISTING LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE.

    THE DUNCE-O-CRATS are LYING THEIR ASSES OFF about a "legislative purpose", and the OBAMIDIOT JUDGE KNOWINGLY COMPLIED WITH AN ILLEGAL REQUEST, to serve the " GETR TRUMP" agenda, and EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The left thinks they can IGNORE the CONSTITUTION with their "hand-picked judges", like they did for YEARS under the Obama Adm....NOT ANYMORE.

    " The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

    https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571





    Subpoenas for Trump financial records on hold pending appeal: court filing


    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp will not have to immediately hand over the financial records of U.S. President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization, according to a court filing on Saturday.

    The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers.


    A lawyer for the Trumps argued earlier this week that the subpoenas exceeded the authority of Congress and were "the epitome of an inquiry into private or personal matters."



    https://www.yahoo.com/news/subpoenas...0--sector.html
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    anatta (05-27-2019), anonymoose (05-28-2019), Stretch (05-27-2019), Truth Detector (05-28-2019), USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Bad news for demalquedacrats

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Grokmaster (05-27-2019), Truth Detector (05-28-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Bad news for demalquedacrats
    They were so sure that this was IT, weren't they?

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Clause 5: Speaker and other officers; Impeachment


    The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

  7. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeac...to_investigate



    House of Representatives: Impeachment[edit]
    "House Manager" redirects here. For theater operations, see House management.
    Impeachment proceedings may be requested by a member of the House of Representatives on his or her own initiative, either by presenting a list of the charges under oath or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be requested by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal judge be impeached, a charge of actions constituting grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutor, the President, or state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by petition. An impeachment proceeding formally begins with a resolution adopted by the full House of Representatives, which typically includes a referral to a House committee.
    The type of impeachment resolution determines the committee to which it is referred. A resolution impeaching a particular individual is typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. A resolution to authorize an investigation regarding impeachable conduct is referred to the House Committee on Rules, and then to the Judiciary Committee. The House Committee on the Judiciary, by majority vote, will determine whether grounds for impeachment exist. If the Committee finds grounds for impeachment, it will set forth specific allegations of misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment. The Impeachment Resolution, or Articles of Impeachment, are then reported to the full House with the committee's recommendations.
    The House debates the resolution and may at the conclusion consider the resolution as a whole or vote on each article of impeachment individually. A simple majority of those present and voting is required for each article for the resolution as a whole to pass. If the House votes to impeach, managers (typically referred to as "House managers", with a "lead House manager") are selected to present the case to the Senate. Recently, managers have been selected by resolution, while historically the House would occasionally elect the managers or pass a resolution allowing the appointment of managers at the discretion of the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. These managers are roughly the equivalent of the prosecution or district attorney in a standard criminal trial.
    Also, the House will adopt a resolution in order to notify the Senate of its action. After receiving the notice, the Senate will adopt an order notifying the House that it is ready to receive the managers. The House managers then appear before the bar of the Senate and exhibit the articles of impeachment. After the reading of the charges, the managers return and make a verbal report to the House.

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    good. this is pure fishing by Nadler et all

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-28-2019)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  12. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  14. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    About time the LEFTIDIOTS in the Federal Judiciary were CALLED OUT on their blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL rulings to Serve the Agenda by judicial fiat.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-28-2019)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Get ready for the DUNCE-O-CRAT 9th Circus judge who just INSERTED HIMSELF INTO EXECUTIVE BRANCH POWERS over PROTECTING THE BORDER, to get the USUAL NINTH CIRCUS SMACKDOWN from the "higher ups"..., as well.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (05-27-2019)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Frivilous appeal interposed in bad faith= stall tactic = another count of obstruction of justice and another contempt of citation

  20. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Told you so, Left Twits; OBAMIDIOT JUDGES, do not get to IGNORE ESTABLISHED JURISPRUDENCE in the interest of the HOUSE DUNCE-O-CRAT WITCH HUNT....a "POSSIBLE, INDEFINITE, MAYBE 'FUTURE' LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE"....is NOT AN EXISTING LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE.

    THE DUNCE-O-CRATS are LYING THEIR ASSES OFF about a "legislative purpose", and the OBAMIDIOT JUDGE KNOWINGLY COMPLIED WITH AN ILLEGAL REQUEST, to serve the " GETR TRUMP" agenda, and EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The left thinks they can IGNORE the CONSTITUTION with their "hand-picked judges", like they did for YEARS under the Obama Adm....NOT ANYMORE.

    " The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

    https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571





    Subpoenas for Trump financial records on hold pending appeal: court filing


    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp will not have to immediately hand over the financial records of U.S. President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization, according to a court filing on Saturday.

    The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers.


    A lawyer for the Trumps argued earlier this week that the subpoenas exceeded the authority of Congress and were "the epitome of an inquiry into private or personal matters."



    https://www.yahoo.com/news/subpoenas...0--sector.html
    The Democrats in the House agreed to hold off, you stupid fuck. It was not a court ruling that forced it.

    RW lying cocksuckers

  21. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Frivilous appeal interposed in bad faith= stall tactic = another count of obstruction of justice and another contempt of citation
    Perhaps you should LEARN THE LAW FIRST; CAN't FIGURE OUT WHAT THIS MEANS????




    " The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

    https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-28-2019)

  23. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    The Democrats in the House agreed to hold off, you stupid fuck. It was not a court ruling that forced it.

    RW lying cocksuckers


    ".....The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers."
    STUPID FUCK;

    WASHINGTON
    as a federal judge upheld a subpoena for his financial records


    DO YOU EVER KNOW WTF YOU ARE BLATHERING ABOUT????


    What A LYING ASS FUCKHEAD.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-28-2019)

  25. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post

    ".....The filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York followed an appeal submitted on Friday by Trump and his affiliates against an existing order from a federal judge allowing the banks to hand over financial records to Democratic lawmakers."
    STUPID FUCK;

    WASHINGTON
    as a federal judge upheld a subpoena for his financial records


    DO YOU EVER KNOW WTF YOU ARE BLATHERING ABOUT????


    What A LYING ASS FUCKHEAD.
    “the agreement to hold off for now on enforcing the subpoenas for Trump's financial records was a rare accord between Trump's attorneys, the banks and the House Intelligence and the Financial Services Committees.”

    Lying cocksucker

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-22-2019, 10:21 AM
  2. Replies: 55
    Last Post: 05-05-2019, 07:14 AM
  3. Cummings has bagged 10 yrs of Trump's financial records, guaranteed
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 04-04-2019, 06:54 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-02-2019, 12:48 PM
  5. Court filing: Ex-lawyer says he told Trump about Kremlin contact
    By Guno צְבִי in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-01-2018, 11:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •