Why is Brennan obstructing justice

[canceled.2021.2]

You can’t have a criminal intent with no underlying crime.

Actually you can but it makes it much harder to do

[Darth Omar]

Actually you can but it makes it much harder to do

But putting arcane legal arguments in front of a jury isn’t a winning strategy.

[domer76]

You will find out soon enough

Be patient.

Wait for Barr

Don’t hold your breath, moron. You’ll die.

[Flash]

Is witness tampering not a form of obstruction of justice? I believe it is.

What witness did he tamper with in giving his opinion about release of documents?

It must involve murder or attempted murder, physical force or attempt at physical force, hinder, delay or prevent some action.

To claim Brennan tampered with a witness or obstructed justice would mean any citizen who gave a similar opinion would be guilty of the same crime.

This is a big stretch to claim Brennan did anything wrong. It is like many of our posters who make accusations of treason that are not even close to the real thing.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512

[domer76]

You can’t have a criminal intent with no underlying crime.

There doesn’t have to be an underlying crime, you fucking moron.

[anatta]

[domer76]

Especially since the Mueller investigation was never obstructed. Mueller was never fired, and received unprecedented cooperation from Trump. Furthermore, how do you obstruct a bogus investigation? In all reality, Trump had every right to put a stop to this fraud of an investigation, he had every right to fire Mueller. I was one of those saying he should've fired Mueller. In hindsight, I was wrong. By not firing Mueller, he has all the political capital he'll ever need to counter investigate. Now that he has released the Kraken (declassified), the Dems are quivering in their wadin' boots. Looks like Nadler literally stroked out the other day, lol.

10 instances of obstruction in the Mueller report

[Darth Omar]

What witness did he tamper with in giving his opinion about release of documents?

It must involve murder or attempted murder, physical force or attempt at physical force, hinder, delay or prevent some action.

To claim Brennan tampered with a witness or obstructed justice would mean any citizen who gave a similar opinion would be guilty of the same crime.

This is a big stretch to claim Brennan did anything wrong. It is like many of our posters who make accusations of treason that are not even close to the real thing.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512

That’s a better argument if Brennan were a John Doe citizen and not a former Director—who could still hold sway over people in the agency and ‘hinder’ them from cooperating with Barr.

If I were his lawyer I’d counsel against making such statements—particularly, in light of the legal exposure Brennan has already.

[Darth Omar]

There doesn’t have to be an underlying crime, you fucking moron.

Right.

But only if you want to make a pathetically weak indictment. Mullet apparently thought better of if.

*Thinking* Democrats in the House know it would never fly as well. You might notice they aren’t having the impeachment vote lol.

[anatta]

That’s a better argument if Brennan were a John Doe citizen and not a former Director—who could still hold sway over people in the agency and ‘hinder’ them from cooperating with Barr.

If I were his lawyer I’d counsel against making such statements—particularly, in light of the legal exposure Brennan has already.

I don't know if it;'s actual obstruction or not, but it's Brennan running scared.
the Creep has been running his mouth from the safety of the sidelines on CNN where he lets his bile flow
-but now it's karma time. Payback's a bitch

[Darth Omar]

I don't know if it;'s actual obstruction or not, but it's Brennan running scared.
the Creep has been running his mouth from the safety of the sidelines on CNN where he lets his bile flow
-but now it's karma time. Payback's a bitch

It’s certainly not actual obstruction.

But threadbare legal arguments in support of obstruction are in vogue now and I think they should be applied equally across the board lol.

[anatta]

It’s certainly not actual obstruction.

But threadbare legal arguments in support of obstruction are in vogue now and I think they should be applied equally across the board lol.

i get the point.
throw the book at the Creeps - they have also damaged our foreign policy and Trump's ability to even talk to Putin

[Darth Omar]

i get the point.
throw the book at the Creeps - they have also damaged our foreign policy and Trump's ability to even talk to Putin

It’s Memorial Day weekend.

By July the Horowitz report should be out and whatever Barr and Durham have [or don’t have] should soon follow. So by Fall books should be slung.

But I’m still waiting to see.

[cancel2 2022]

10 instances of obstruction in the Mueller report

Impeach away and virtually guarantee that Trump will be re-elected!! Democrats are so shortsighted, seemingly driven by illogic and emotion.

[Stretch]

10 instances of obstruction in the Mueller report

Better go tell Mullet that he should have made that decision then.