I keep hearing, there is nothing to investigate:

[Jarod]

Mueller shut down the investigation Garud. You simply don't like the results.

You are ignorant.

This is simply untrue. Mueller did his job, reported the facts and now Congress needs to do its oversight. I am not saying impeach, I am saying they are within their rights to issue the subpoena's they have issued.

[Jarod]

Sorry. Typo. A AG, not SP.
It's up to SP to simply turn over his report to the AG...which he did without recommendations on the obstruction charge.
He DID however report that there was nothing to the Trump/Russia hoax.

You have clearly not read the Mueller report, he did nothing of the sort.

[dukkha]

Origins

[FONT="]The constitutional framers assumed that Congress would conduct investigations as the British House of Commons conducted them. James Wilson of Pennsylvania, a future Supreme Court Justice and Convention delegate, wrote in a 1774 essay that members of the Commons were considered “grand inquisitors of the realm. The proudest ministers of the proudest monarchs have trembled at their censures; and have appeared at the bar of the house, to give an account of their conduct, and ask pardon for their faults.” When the U.S. House convened in 1789, it established an early set of select committees, such as Rules and Ways and Means, to structure the legislative process including investigations.

https://history.house.gov/Institutio...ons-Oversight/[/FONT]

....

[Jarod]

SP's give recommendations regarding any evidence they have or have not found.

Right

[Jarod]

Wrong. Their powers relate to legislative issues. They do not get to dig through a DoJ database hoping to find something they can use politically.

Mueller investigated. Provided them his report. They are not even entitled to that.

They cannot just issue subpoenas because they feel like it.

They are not issuing subpoenas because they feel like it, they are issuing subpoenas because they have a basis, see the first post on this thread.

[Jarod]

SIMPLY saying "kill my wife" is not a crime -there needs to be some evidence of plotting (conspiracy) -
which are then the ACTS

The phone call is the act. You are dumb.

[Superfreak]

There was no outcome by Mueller, silly. It is a report, Now its Congress's job to use that report to do their oversight job.

Garud, stop lying. They certainly have a right to try to impeach. But no, they do not have a right to the underlying data that was collected. They do not have a right to even the report. Yet they got almost all of it.

[Superfreak]

They are not issuing subpoenas because they feel like it, they are issuing subpoenas because they have a basis, see the first post on this thread.

No, they do not. They are restarting the same stupid witch hunt all over again.

[Superfreak]

You have clearly not read the Mueller report, he did nothing of the sort.

Yes, he did. So clearly you have not read the report.

[Jarod]

No, they do not. They are restarting the same stupid witch hunt all over again.

The Judges who have heard the issue disagree with you and agree with me.

[dukkha]

The phone call is the act. You are dumb.

If I say "kill my wife" to someone do you think i could get charged?? WTF is wrong with you?

I have to provide money / or engage in a conspiracy. something more then an outburst

[Superfreak]

The Judges who have heard the issue disagree with you and agree with me.

Judges that will be overturned, because like you, they are wrong.

[Jarod]

Yes, he did. So clearly you have not read the report.

Quote the statement, because its not there.

[Getin the ring]

You have clearly not read the Mueller report, he did nothing of the sort.

lets follow your interpretation of what Mueller found.

he found evidence to indict Flynn, Manafort, Cohen, and a few others, and he provided the evidence, pressed charges and secured the indictments.
BUT
he decided NOT to indict Trump, or press charges and secure the indictment.
Because he instead wanted congress to do it in Trumps case?

you really wonder why we laugh at you?

[Jarod]

If I say "kill my wife" to someone do you think i could get charged?? WTF is wrong with you?

I have to provide money / or engage in a conspiracy. something more then an outburst

No, but if you say it to someone under your employ who you pay... yes you would likely get charged.

Trump is known for firing people who do not carry out his orders.