Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 178

Thread: Trump Wanted An Ass Kisser As AG

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    La Pine, Oregon
    Posts
    5,218
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 1,548 Times in 1,137 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 215 Times in 201 Posts

    Default Trump Wanted An Ass Kisser As AG

    Now he has one, and we can see why:

    https://news.yahoo.com/ag-barr-says-...-politics.html

    "In a speech Tuesday night, Barr took aim at the broad judicial power, arguing that federal judges who have issued the so-called nationwide injunctions are hampering Trump's efforts on immigration, health care and other issues with "no clear end in sight."

    It is the latest example of Barr moving to embrace Trump's political talking points.

    The attorney general is traditionally expected to carry out the president's agenda as a member of the Cabinet while trying to avoid political bias. Democrats have cast Barr as an attorney general who acts more like Trump's personal lawyer instead of the nation's chief law enforcement officer.

    At a re-election rally earlier this month, Trump railed against "activist judges who issue nationwide injunctions based on their personal beliefs," which he said "undermine democracy and threaten the rule of law."

    Administration officials have often complained about the proliferation of nationwide injunctions since Trump became president. Vice President Mike Pence said a few weeks ago that the administration intends to challenge the right of federal district courts to issue such rulings.

    "The legal community and the broader public should be more concerned, particularly about this trend of nationwide injunctions," Barr said.

    Barr highlighted the legal fights that have happened in federal courts across the country over Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that shields young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children but don't have legal status to protect them from deportation."

    Maybe Trump should try following the law, and the Constitution for a change. Then too, the Republicans proved long ago that neither matters to them.
    "2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"

  2. The Following User Groans At Old Trapper For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-24-2019)

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Old Trapper For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-22-2019), ThatOwlWoman (05-22-2019)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The "clear end in sight" is that much of Trump's agenda is unconstitutional.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-22-2019)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    It will be difficult to bring the country back after 4 years of ignorance and corruption. I hope the damage this floundering fool has brought can be repaired,

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Pence said a few weeks ago that the administration intends to challenge the right of federal district courts to issue such rulings.

    "The legal community and the broader public should be more concerned, particularly about this trend of nationwide injunctions," Barr said.

    In a speech Tuesday night, Barr took aim at the broad judicial power, arguing that federal judges who have issued the so-called nationwide injunctions are hampering POTUS efforts on immigration, health care and other issues with "no clear end in sight."

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Trapper View Post

    "In a speech Tuesday night, Barr took aim at the broad judicial power, arguing that federal judges who have issued the so-called nationwide injunctions are hampering Trump's efforts on immigration, health care and other issues with "no clear end in sight."

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,003
    Thanks
    146,863
    Thanked 83,341 Times in 53,241 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Pence said a few weeks ago that the administration intends to challenge the right of federal district courts to issue such rulings.
    "The legal community and the broader public should be more concerned, particularly about this trend of nationwide injunctions," Barr said.
    Isn't the purpose of an injunction to stay some action pending more thorough review by a court or courts?

    How interesting that the party of "smaller government" is now okay with handing the executive branch unbridled power. Something tells me that if Obama had proposed this, we'd still be hearing the echoes of the RW screaming.

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    As opposed to Holder being Obamas boy?
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  13. The Following User Groans At Getin the ring For This Awful Post:

    Gonzomin (05-22-2019)

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-22-2019), MAGA MAN (05-22-2019), Stretch (05-22-2019), Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  15. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Isn't the purpose of an injunction to stay some action pending more thorough review by a court or courts?

    How interesting that the party of "smaller government" is now okay with handing the executive branch unbridled power. Something tells me that if Obama had proposed this, we'd still be hearing the echoes of the RW screaming.
    Troubling trend of nationwide injunctions
    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...de-injunctions

    ^detalied.
    district courts are trying to be players in national federal separation of powers issues

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  17. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    hand picked liberal nut-bag judges are trying to screw this country up

    fear not, as soon as Ruth BAder takes her trip, the important cases will get pushed to the top for constitutional merit
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-22-2019), Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  19. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Isn't the purpose of an injunction to stay some action pending more thorough review by a court or courts?

    How interesting that the party of "smaller government" is now okay with handing the executive branch unbridled power. Something tells me that if Obama had proposed this, we'd still be hearing the echoes of the RW screaming.
    What I screamed about back then were liberal politicians using the courts to force shit on the People that they couldn't get through legislation.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-22-2019), Stretch (05-22-2019), Truth Detector (05-22-2019)

  21. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    The "clear end in sight" is that much of Trump's agenda is unconstitutional.
    McThink McSo?

  22. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    hand picked liberal nut-bag judges are trying to screw this country up

    fear not, as soon as Ruth BAder takes her trip, the important cases will get pushed to the top for constitutional merit
    How do you know she's not already dead?

  23. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,003
    Thanks
    146,863
    Thanked 83,341 Times in 53,241 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Soul View Post
    What I screamed about back then were liberal politicians using the courts to force shit on the People that they couldn't get through legislation.
    You mean like trying to force the USSCt to overturn Roe v Wade by stacking the deck first?

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    As opposed to Holder being Obamas boy?
    "Wingman."


  25. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatFowlWoman View Post
    You mean like trying to force the USSCt to overturn Roe v Wade by stacking the deck first?
    Who's doing that?

Similar Threads

  1. I Believe God Wanted Trump To Be President?!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-04-2019, 06:10 PM
  2. The Trump Administration Help-Wanted Ad?
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-12-2018, 09:44 AM
  3. Who here thinks Trump ran and actually wanted to win?
    By Cancel 2018.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-06-2017, 05:57 AM
  4. APP - If Trump really wanted to end the Flinn investigation
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2017, 07:04 AM
  5. Anyone have a good animated "butt kisser" emoticon ?
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 09:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •