Originally Posted by
domer76
Just the opposite, illiterate racist cunt.
Barrel strokers think that ANY law that restricts ANYTHING about guns is a violation of their Constitutional rights. A bunch of ignorant morons.
From the Heller decision. The majority opinion:
“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the opinione historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.”
Find a literate person to explain that to you.
Rights are "INALIENABLE." any gun law without the validation of an amendment to the Constitution therefore is a violation of "INALIENABLE" constitutional rights and an invalid unconstitutional law, regardless of what any court decision says. Honest folks of just principles & integrity, know this full well. "An armed people are a free people."
"Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."
Bookmarks